Posted on 07/24/2019 5:39:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
Need a master class on the Mueller report before Robert Mueller testifies before Congress? Join PBS NewsHour correspondent and producer William Brangham, senior broadcast producer Mike Melia and digital politics editor and senior writer Daniel Bush on July 24 as they answer questions and walk viewers through the Russia investigation and Mueller's findings. The livestream kicks off at 7:40 a.m. EDT with a breakdown of the major findings and moments from Mueller's report. Between deep dives on parts of the report, your hosts will answer select questions from the live chat and social media.
To ask a question, use our live chat window to the right or tweet us @NewsHour.
Stay tuned for PBS NewsHour’s ongoing coverage of Mueller's testimony, which begins at 8:30 a.m. in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and continues at noon with a House Intelligence committee hearing.
It had to do with whether or not people should report any contact with foreign governments (I think). He said it “could be a crime”. (From memory. Not sure of the exact verbiage.) He snuck it in there as a quick after-thought. I was thinking the Rats were waiting for him to throw out some crumb to latch on to for the future. Maybe not ... just how I took it.
He had an Ensure Martini for lunch. ;)
The republicans have had 3 years to orchestrate this “cross examination”.. They have a set-time, so I expect that they have their gameplan for each member to ask specific questions.
Essentially, Nunes is the lead-off batter, and they are loading the bases.
That’s true. Maybe she picked it up at Goodwill.
She is really stupid.
“Anything of value.” is now “dirt on opponent.”
he is doing it even when answering dems but not as bad as to republicans
Who was that before Ratcliff? He asked only one question re Mueller being asked to leave something out of report? Then yielded his time.
Someone could have run out to the dollar store and bought him glasses.
Mueller answers and defers as he chooses.....has nothing to do with other cases or not.
LOL.. I know! Hey Schiff.. weren’t you in the market for fake nakid Trump pics from Russians?
Huge difference between “we had the evidence to indict but could not because our hands were tied”, and “we could not truly find the culpability evidence to indict at all”. That really needed to be corrected, clarified, and brought to the front as it was.
I listened to all of it that I can stand, which wasn’t much. What a disgusting circus.
LOL I cant accept that characterization to the SPace Suit DEM
It is strategy. It comes and goes when a R is asking the questions.
A very poor strategy. Obviously, they have nothing on Trump.
One of the Fox gals on Outnumbered called Mueller “feeble”. Ha!
Bfl
“Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) questions former Special Counsel Robert Mueller on his relationship with James Comey and the people he chose to hire to his team.
“If somebody (Trump) knows they did not conspire with anybody from Russia to affect the election and they see the big Justice Department with people that hate that person coming after him and then a special counsel appointed who hires a dozen or more people that hate that person and he knows he’s innocent, he’s not corruptly acting in order to see that justice is done,” Gohmert said Wednesday.
********************
“What he’s (Trump) doing is not obstructing justice. He is pursuing justice.
And the fact that you ran it out two years means you perpetuated injustice,” Gohmert finished.”
*********************
That black Dem was reminding Mueller again what is in his report. lol.
I love Mr. Turner !!!!!!!!!
Ha, perhaps Mueller’s law school teaches exonerating different from all others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.