Posted on 06/27/2019 10:24:10 AM PDT by Red Badger
Drudge Report poll shows Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii winning the debate Gabbard got nearly 40 per cent of people saying that she won the debate Elizabeth Warren came in second place while John Delaney came in third Gabbard, an Iraq War veteran, is a Hindu woman born in American Samoa She is considered controversial due to her foreign policy views In January 2017, Gabbard met in Damascus with Syria's Bashar Assad Meeting took place after Assad allegedly used chemical weapons during civil war
Tulsi Gabbard is the winner of the first Democratic debate in Miami on Wednesday, according to a Drudge Report poll.
The popular news aggregation internet site took a poll of users which asked who won the 10-candidate debate.
Surprisingly, nearly 40 per cent of those who took the survey chose the 38-year-old congresswoman from Hawaii as the runaway winner.
Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts came in second with 12.26 per cent of the vote.
John Delaney, the former congressman from Maryland, was in third place while New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio came in fourth.
House Rep. Tim Ryan, Senator Amy Klobuchar, Governor Jay Inslee, former Housing Secretary Julian Castro, former House Rep. Beto ORourke, and Senator Cory Booker rounded out the list.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Compared to the rest of the freak show on the stage, she sounded more rational than the others.
“Whenever I read that ones posts Im reminded of rumors about Russian trolls whose job consists of sowing distrust and discord on political forums.”
Yeah. It’s weird.
“I think we deserve to know why he refused to follow the normal extradition process and chose to go to war instead.”
Bin Laden was indicted well prior to 911 for other bombings.
Government of Afghanistan, the Taliban, did not and was not going to extradite bin Laden (just suggesting so is absurd).
Taliban harbored bin Laden and Al Qaeda and sponsored them.
Nothing you say makes sense and it’s hard to believe someone could be that ignorant and unintelligent.
We got 28 pages that those who have read it say the Saudi government, not OBL as a lone wolf, was the organizing force behind the attack.
It really doesn't matter if their refusal was preordained. For the record we should have established just cause, and this was not done.
If you still believe that the war in Afghanistan was pursued in good faith, then there really is no area of agreement we can dome to. There's no better proof than the fact that we are still there today, no real mission, just an endless bleed of men and resources. OBL is dead... right? He was in Pakistan and Iran for a long time before he died... right? And we knew this... correct? And we are fighting still an interminable war in Afghanistan now... why?
It’s not the first time that I’ve had that impression from this same poster. Granted that we have our share of kooks, but the trolls do exist whether or not any are active here. Mostly they were supposed to have been on Facebook stirring the pot, sometimes taking both sides of an issue. It’s one of the few bits of “russian collusion” that neither side disputed.
“We got 28 pages that those who have read it”
In other words you’ve never seen those 28 pages, can’t link to them, and so it’s just hearsay.
This response makes no sense in context of your earlier comments.
Yes.
Either troll or looney.
I get sick of that myself.
Young Blue Eyes came last ???
OH NOOOOOOOOEZ
That’s rasis !!!
Yup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.