Posted on 06/22/2019 7:43:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll is selling a book of her steamy sexual misadventures and sure enough, there's a story about how Donald Trump, circa 1995 or 1996, raped the writer in the dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in New York, a pretty extreme charge buried under a big pile of stories about men who supposedly exploited her. The Trump administration has denied the whole thing as "completely false."
I find it hard to believe. Carroll does name a long string of men who abused her one way or another, and some of them are #metoo poster boys, such as Les Moonves. It's easy to believe a story about him groping her in an elevator, because he did this sort of thing to so many others. Charges against Moonves have been substantiated. Trump's a different story, though. He's also been accused of sexual misbehavior, often just bad talk, not acts, but there's never been any substantiation.
Maybe that's why she placed her encounter with him at the bottom of her list, as a writer, she would know that you always put your strongest material first. Her hazy encounter with its serious charges (which are now shifting to look at Twitter) has the look of piling on, riding from other women's unsubstantiated accusations as if to score a political point. And she's not staying steady - she's now alternating between charges of assault and actual rape.
Trump himself points out that he's never met her and she is out to sell a book, which might explain why she never went public until now, even in the heat of the election back when everyone was trying to take Trump down or even moreso in the bitter aftermath.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Yeah, she is about a 4 on a scale of 10. I doubt he would be interested
Is that CARROLL?
Who’s the dude in the black dress?
Did anyone see any news comment such as “Uh, how come something so important was not mentioned during the many months of anti-Trump accusations?”
Maybe like Prof. Ford about Kavanaugh her phony memory only came up at just the right time to hurt someone. Or now to sell books.
Ruff Hit...
Yep, I saw the picture she was peddling, claiming this is the outfit she was wearing when Trump allegedly attacked her.
That picture and these claims, are like a parody of the left. That mannish stern appearing woman in the picture, claims that this is what she looked like as Trump took advantage of her. Somehow this is supposed to engender sympathy for her?
Wasn’t she a Crack Smokin Prostitute in the mid 90’s???
Even among white, educated, suburban women who deserted us in 2018, this has long been baked into the cake.
My immediate thought was why would Trump tell her he recognized her as the “advice woman” from a women’s magazine. Trump was not then, nor now, a guy who would be reading or even looking at a women’s magazine, much less reading the women’s advice column enough to notice the picture of the writer of the column. That alone did not hold water for me.
Said they had the best security in the world of retail and this would never have gone undetected.
Blonde, very made up with a very high slit, shall we say. I don’t think he was super picky back in the day. And he has admitted that women were his weakness.
But I don’t believe her story.
Why didn’t Carroll scream?
But I know this about men who physically take advantage of women. They do it serially, and they have a string of accusations that follow them.
Women who know Trump say that he always acted like a gentleman. And because of Trump's money and being around women--a lot of women--if he were the pawing, "all hands, everywhere" type, there would be a long history of accusations.
I can’t imagine a dressing room being a “safe” place for a rapist to attack. Wouldn’t they have an attendant? Or did security stop at the upper-middle class? Were the wealthy places too afraid of looking like they cared about money? Trump was also very media conscious and concerned about his public image; as small-potatoes as she was, she was somewhat influential in society; she wasn’t the sort of enemy who could bring him down, perhaps, but she was enough to be a nuissance and hurt a deal or two. She claim Trump knew her, so he would know this.
No blue dress. For two decades the standard has been a blue dress. Never happened.
But I've never stolen one.
Just because Trump has a weakness for women doesn't mean that he would get "fresh."
But you want to see how she turned out?
You don’t scream in fantasies like this.
Book pimping. She would have been .009 percent more credible if it weren’t a sales scam.
As a woman, I find it unlikely that I could be raped in a dressing room. The upscales have attendants? Even Walmart does.
Back then a man in a women’s dressing room.. not likely.
Roday, it’s encouraged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.