First Amendment Triumph - The Extraordinary Directed Verdict in the Teter v. Veritas Trial

Project veritas ^ | 6/6/2019 | Project Veritas

[Godebert]

Watch Project Veritas' first feature video about the Teter v. Veritas trial.

[Godebert]

Direct link to video: First Amendment Triumph - The Extraordinary Directed Verdict in the Teter v. Veritas Trial

[Wonder Warthog]

I don’t watch videos. Information transfer WAY too slow compared to reading. Also can’t hear worth a flip, and too many videos are uncaptioned, and thus worthless as I don’t “lip-read”. I’ll gladly read a transcript if one exists (doubtful).

[ptsal]

BKMK

[bert]

Amen

Videos are for illiterates

[Dalberg-Acton]

https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/05/22/project-veritas-wins-defamation-case-undercover-journalism-vindicated/

[Uncle Miltie]

I don’t watch videos.

Anyone have a textual summary?

[Wonder Warthog]

That is NOT a transcript of the video. Copies of court documents don’t constitute transcripts of anything but the court actions.

[morphing libertarian]

You lose

[Wonder Warthog]

"You lose"

Yes, I do. Because I can't access the content of the VIDEO (not court documents). But so does the organization who posted the video, because they lose one who just might support their work.

[Godebert]

You can click on the CC button at the bottom right of the video to enable closed captioning.

You can also click on the settings button (small gear wheel) and watch and read the captions at any speed up to 2X.

[Wonder Warthog]

I know how to use captions. The problem still is that the rate of data transfer is simply way, way too slow compared to reading an article. Watching a captioned video is like watching grass grow. The video part adds NOTHING to the information.

There are a very few videos in which the photo part adds to or is the relevant content, but for 95 percent of the time, give me written content.