LORD, Rescue the unborn from abortion. Forgive us for our complacency.
We say, “We knew nothing about this," but You who weighs the heart
knows everything. (Proverbs 24:11-12)
In JESUS' Name we pray. AMEN.
Posted on 05/29/2019 4:32:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
Is Ruthie dead yet?
LORD, Rescue the unborn from abortion. Forgive us for our complacency.
We say, “We knew nothing about this," but You who weighs the heart
knows everything. (Proverbs 24:11-12)
In JESUS' Name we pray. AMEN.
Is Indiana really trying to erect barriers to aborting any unborn child except a healthy white male? This seems bizarre, to say the least.
“...the law does not recognize that an aborted fetus is a person.”
Then the law is immoral and insane.
As the doctor they expressed their wishes to, I would quickly and discreetly lead them into a small quiet room where the procedure is to be preformed and calmly put a bullet in both of their heads. Her first.
For all of those women who cry “because I’m a woman, and it’s my body, I have a choice”, what choice does the woman in the womb have?!!!!
I know this world is made up of all kinds of people, but I never thought people would agree with aborting a child because it is not the sex they wanted. The world has definitely gone insane!
This is the real danger in a society where the foundations of the law are no longer rational. Even most laws passed to protect human life are irrational.
China would be proud.
I don’t know where you’re coming up with this. If the parents decided to abort a baby simply BECAUSE it is a white male that would have also been forbidden under this law. I think the bigger issue is, how do you definitively know what the true reason for the abortion is? Seems like the law could have been skirted pretty easily.
Drs take an oath... FOR life.
Days past, patients died for lack of cures. Today they know too much and play with life.. messing in what should be, a forbidden arena.
I haven’t had a chance to drill down into either the law or the ruling.
But if the law is as you say, my guess is that the Indiana legislature constructed the law to trigger the SJW talking points about eugenics, to demonstrate that the talking points were merely posturing all along: that the left wants unlimited abortion on demand even if used for eugenics or to preferentially abort those otherwise highly ranked on the SJW victim scale.
“because I’m a woman, and it’s my body, I have a choice”
I did not get to my point of view on abortion on religious grounds. Seems to have started back in my high school days when the Vietnam war had just started to escalate. If you were an 18 year old guy, you had to register for the draft, with a good chance you’d wind up going to fight. Lots of people complained and protested about this fact.
I remember being at a friend of mines house with several other people from school. One of them was on a rant, about “I have two sisters and they don’t have to register for the draft.” My friends father who was in the next room (and a World War II vet) came into the room and said, “boy, it’s this simple - women have babies and men fight wars.” Seemed completely logical to me.
As far as I can remember, no women ever assembled in groups to protest not being drafted. I guess at that time it wasn’t “their body and their choice.” And what my friend’s father had said made perfectly good sense to me.
Hideous.
If you want to kill “it” because it is colored, female, or might be handicapped that is “protected” because the sissy court didn’t want to weigh in at this point. It’s a big groundbreaking decision and they want it to kick around in the lower courts first. But gay gay gay cases can change the nation every June (Pride Month, how queer is it they reserve June for those decisions).
Killing one child to obtain another. I guess we know the value of the second child to the ‘parents’ - nothing.
Jesus is coming and he’s pissed.
That’s a good point. But let’s be honest here — the whole purpose of this law was to protect female and minority children. That’s because of the cultural and historical factors in play where these groups have been targeted for “disposal.” Clarence Thomas even makes this point in his published filing on the matter.
I feel like I'm back in the 60s, watching some apocalyptic futuristic movie.
Invasion Of The Body Snatchers, Part Deux?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.