Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
The Indiana law that was the subject of this petition seems like it would never stand up under any objective legal scrutiny.

Is Indiana really trying to erect barriers to aborting any unborn child except a healthy white male? This seems bizarre, to say the least.

4 posted on 05/29/2019 4:39:38 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.” — Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

I don’t know where you’re coming up with this. If the parents decided to abort a baby simply BECAUSE it is a white male that would have also been forbidden under this law. I think the bigger issue is, how do you definitively know what the true reason for the abortion is? Seems like the law could have been skirted pretty easily.


11 posted on 05/29/2019 4:53:38 AM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

I haven’t had a chance to drill down into either the law or the ruling.
But if the law is as you say, my guess is that the Indiana legislature constructed the law to trigger the SJW talking points about eugenics, to demonstrate that the talking points were merely posturing all along: that the left wants unlimited abortion on demand even if used for eugenics or to preferentially abort those otherwise highly ranked on the SJW victim scale.


13 posted on 05/29/2019 4:58:19 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson