Joe diGenova: John Huber Investigation of Clinton Foundation is a Farce – Never Even Started

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | May 28 2019 | J Hoft

[Para-Ord.45]

Former US Attorney Joe diGenova says that the Huber investigation into the Clinton Foundation is a farce. Huber hasn’t even interviewed the top witness in the case whom diGenova represents!

John Huber is the special prosecutor tapped by former AG Jeff Sessions to investigate FISA abuses by Obama’s DOJ/FBI. Sessions nominated Huber to perform this investigation after numerous calls for a special investigation into the Clinton Foundation and the Deep State.

But months ago we reported that nothing was getting done. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee say John Huber still has not interviewed key witnesses and they want answers.

Mark Meadows (R-NC), Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Doug Collins (R-GA) sent a letter to special prosecutor John Huber on January 8th demanding answers by a January 21st deadline.

“Your investigation has been ongoing for over nine months. During the course of our extensive investigation we have interviewed more than a dozen current and former DOJ and FBI personnel, and were surprised to hear none of these potentially informative witnesses testified to speaking with you,” the GOP lawmakers wrote.

[humblegunner]

In the face of overwhelming proof

It would be cool if one of y'all would come out of the corn
with a good clean chart of all them overwhopping proofs
and shut these unbelievers right down. To the ground.

In the face.

[Boogieman]

I understand very well the context of my post, but the fact still remains that I never said anything about “kiddie porn pages” or “3rd graders”. Those are your words, you wrote them, so you own them. If you think you can attribute your own words to me and I won’t point out what you are doing, then you are mistaken.

“You make Maxine Waters look like an intellectual...”

You make the Clintons look honest.

[BiggBob]

You can lead a jackass to water you can’t make them drink

[Boogieman]

Ah, I see. You think you can define both your position and the position of everyone that disagrees with you, then you get to argue against the opposition position that you just invented.

That’s not really how things work in the real world. That may work when you are arguing with imaginary people in your room at night, I guess.

[BiggBob]

That was the context of the 8 chan page comments you liar

[bagster]

It would be cool if one of y'all would come out of the corn with a good clean chart of all them overwhopping proofs

There are tons of "Q proof" links and sites. At this point, we reality based people don't need further proof.

Here's a couple links I got just googling "Q proofs".

I haven't looked at them, because I lived them in real time. Of course, some of them are a stretch and maybe even bogus, but taken together, are undeniable. And this is just a small sampling.

Q Proofs: 12 Proofs of QAnon in Under 3 Minutes

A lot of these are of Trump and his family acknowledging Q. Why would they do that?

Top 10 Proofs of Q Anon..

I haven't looked at this one.

Biggest Intel Drop in our History

I haven't looked at this one either. Like I said, I see the proofs on a daily basis so I really have no need to look at compilations. Over time, I have come to have no doubt about this thing.

Google is so easy to use, even a caveman could do it.

There are hundreds of "proofs". At what point do coincidences become mathematically impossible.

Let it be known that I started out skeptical like you. But I kept an open mind and looked long enough to be convinced. Trouble with these rabble is, they refuse to look.

So, yea.

[bagster]

You make Elijah Cummings not look like a milk dud.

Weeeeeeeeeeee.

This is a fun one. Keep going.

[Boogieman]

“That was the context of the 8 chan page comments...”

Sorry, but just because you and other posters were saying things doesn’t make those words magically jump into my mouth (or keyboard). You said those things, not me, so you own them. This is not complicated stuff.

[bagster]

then you get to argue against the opposition position that you just invented.

Ah, so you DO believe that "things are happening" and that there are legitimate investigations ongoing.

Make up your mind, teeter-tooter boy.

Or better yet, restate your position on these basic issues. And I don't mean kiddy porn, Q, or 8chan.

I mean the subject of this thread and article, which is supposedly why we're here. Enough of the distractions by you cultists.

As far as I'm concerned, you're on team "nothing's happening" until proven otherwise.

Yer still quibbling.

[bagster]

Sorry, but just because you and other posters were saying things doesn’t make those words magically jump into my mouth (or keyboard).

I hate to jump into you and BiggBob's personal beef. But using the logic of the "know nothings" on this thread, if your cohorts talk about kiddy porn and third graders, then you are tainted with their stench.

Sorta like we are tainted because our ORIGINAL SOURCE is on 8chan.

Can't really have it one way, without having it t'other, right?

Talk to your fellow denier cult members if you got a problem with it.

You must accept the premise or our entire culture falls apart, neh?

[Boogieman]

“There are tons of “Q proof” links and sites.”

Yeah, the only problem is, if we judged alcohol the way that Q believers judge Q, then 200 “Q proof” alcohol would leave you stone sober.

“Let it be known that I started out skeptical like you. But I kept an open mind and looked long enough to be convinced. Trouble with these rabble is, they refuse to look.”

This is your problem, Bags. These “proofs” have convinced you, and you think that if others are unconvinced, then the only explanation is that they have not actually looked at the “proofs”. Of course, there are several alternative explanations that you seem to skip right over.

[Boogieman]

“But using the logic of the “know nothings” on this thread, if your cohorts talk about kiddy porn and third graders, then you are tainted with their stench.”

Hmm, it wasn’t “my cohort” that said it, it was BiggBob, so even that logic won’t hold up.

[Boogieman]

“Ah, so you DO believe that “things are happening” and that there are legitimate investigations ongoing.”

There you go trying to create the argument for your opposition so that you can argue against the argument you created.

Granted, that would be very convenient if that was how arguments worked, because you could always win. However, that still isn’t how things work.

[humblegunner]

There are tons of "Q proof" links and sites.

I'm sure.
I was talking about a good clear chart for the derpish retards beyond weeds.
Something with small words and bright colors. Y'all got smart folks, that ought to be a piece of cake.

A lot of these are of Trump and his family acknowledging Q.

Again, bright colors and quotes. Melania said X about Q, Trump said Y about Q.
Nothing oblique, nothing implied... straight up English references and statements.
If it's such overwhopping and undeniable evidence then surely secrecy is no longer a factor.

At what point do coincidences become mathematically impossible.

You tell me, ain't y'all got anybody that can set up a spreadsheet?
Jack Black don't count.

But I kept an open mind and looked long enough to be convinced.

That's what Icarus said about wing design before he flew too close to the
sun, melted his wings and plunged into the sea.

Yo.. I'm just saying.. if your position is so overwhelmingly clear then why not line the whole thing out for all to see?

No links, no homework assignments.. just the meat.

Understanding these things so well, surely one or two of y'all in the Cornfield could craft something us Normies might grasp.

I'd think that would be easy.

[BiggBob]

Here's a recent proof for you

July 2018

Pics dropped of London

Along with the text:

"Keep your promise.
This is not a game."

Speculation at the time was this was directed at Lisa Page

And was a follow up from a post in June of 2018

That said this:

"Tweet meant to provide time guide. What event occurs in Dec (London)? Think Hyde Park. Think prev pic [2] people. Provides Timeframe."

An was with this tweet

Months later in January of 2019

Pages closed door July testimony is released to the public

EXCLUSIVE: Transcripts of Lisa Page’s Closed-Door Testimonies Provide New Revelations in Spygate Scandal

Page noted that she only traveled abroad once while she worked for McCabe, in December 2016, on official business in London. Strzok traveled with her, as did three other unnamed individuals. One individual that Page specified as not being part of the trip was Bill Priestap, the FBI’s head of counterintelligence. Page was prohibited by FBI counsel for detailing the purpose of her visit.

[BiggBob]

Lol try harder para diddler brought up kiddie porn on 8 chan

I said I never saw that page

You commented about that page and said third graders book report

Sorry your reading comprehension is at the third grade level that YOU spoke of

No wonder you can’t connect any dots you don’t even have the mental capacity to comprehend what you yourself wrote...

[bagster]

These “proofs” have convinced you, and you think that if others are unconvinced, then the only explanation is that they have not actually looked at the “proofs”. Of course, there are several alternative explanations that you seem to skip right over.

Of course there are, but they are not worth discussing. The proofs, taken together are undeniable. The only thing I can possibly believe is that deniers haven't looked at them in totality.

If they had, it would be impossible for them to maintain their position. Im frikken possible.

There is no other reasonable explanation. Emphasis on "reasonable".

Either they peeped in once a long time ago and made up their mind and never looked again, or never looked in the first place and get their opinions from people with a motive to disparage Trump's psyop.

It really is hard to watch, knowing what I know.

I feel bad that otherwise smart people on my side refuse to get aboard Trump's movement.

He needs all of us, working together for this to work. And by this, I mean THE PLAN TO SAVE THE WORLD.

[bagster]

Granted, that would be very convenient if that was how arguments worked, because you could always win.

But I already do always win. And that's why these things always descend into flamery and "attempted" ridicule by the argument's losers. Lucky for me, I also excel at flamery and ridicule. So win/win.

I can't recall the last time I ever lost an argument, to be honest. What's it like?

[bagster]

That's a pretty good "proof", Bob. One of the best, really.

It demonstrates that this LARP has access to city of London surveillance cameras, which is where those photos were pulled from. Also that the team was surveilling and aware of the derps meeting in London at that hotel (forget the name of it)

Q posted these "clues" several months before Page testified about the London meeting.

Putting it all together, our derps met with their derps over there in London to coordinate the "coup" and our guys (NSA/MI/Q) were on them.

Q doesn't say WE HAVE IT ALL for nothing.

Just try convincing these "sleepers" of this. That's the challenge.

You can look at a thing, but you also have to THINK. That's the flaw right there. We call it EXPAND YOUR THINKING.

[humblegunner]

Not even close to what I suggested.
Here I line out an opportunity for y’all to come forth from the Cornfield
with the Illumination Of The Ages in plain English and to be the
heroes of the Nation, the Explainers in Chief.. and you shove
some blurry pictures, obscure text and an unrelated Tweet out there?

I’m disappointed. Maybe there are more smarterer Q folks than you
who could give it a shot. Back into the Corn with you.

Scat.