Posted on 05/26/2019 1:55:11 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
The FBI tried to destroy the reputation of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr as controversial unearthed files reveal. Shocking details of the FBI’s smear campaign against MLK Jr have been found on secret tapes, it is claimed. Its is alleged the agency accused the celebrated civil-rights campaigner of having up to 40 affairs.
~[snip} J Edgar Hoover, who believed he had Communist Party ties. Details of the covert tapes have been revealed by biographer David Garrow, ...
MLks secret heartache and the white woman he could never marry.... Hoover feared [King's] popular movement could destabilise the country.
Agents honed in on King’s philandering and claims he fathered a child – claims which Garrow argues could lead to “painful historical reckoning”. Although the tapes, recorded by bugs in two lamps in hotel rooms booked by King in January, 1964, are ... at the US National Archives, the author unearthed the FBI summaries of the various incidents.
He claims they show King had extramarital affairs with up to 45 women and, shockingly, even “looked on and laughed” as pastor friend Logan Kearse raped a parishioner. The recording from the Willard Hotel, near the White House, shows how King was accompanied by Kearse, (died 1991), along with female parishioners of his church. In his hotel room, the files claim, they then “discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts”.
... “when one of the women protested that she did not approve, the Baptist minister immediately and forcefully raped her” as King watched. He is alleged to have “looked on, laughed and offered advice” during the attack. FBI agents were in the room next door, but did not intervene.
(continued below)
(Excerpt) Read more at mirror.co.uk ...
3. Among some of the more specific lines of inquiry I wish to pursue are those which would illuminate the reasons for the continued existence of religious conviction among millions of Soviet citizens, all of whom have been subjected to varying degrees of oppression and discouragement by powerful agencies of propaganda and anti-religious education. This tenacity to spiritual commitment is worthy of careful study for these precise methods to the control of man's relationship to God may be unique in human experience.
4. As a Baptist I am especially interested to be in contact with the large number of practicing Baptists within the Soviet Union.
5. As a Negro I have special concern with the influence that Soviet theory and practice have had upon the millions of colored peoples who populate the less industrially developed areas of the world. As a believer in non-violence as revealed in the teachings of Jesus Christ, I am anxious to examine the reactions of the people in a society which for so many years has sought to deny the basic spiritual and moral doctrine of Christianity.
6. As one who attempts to adhere to a non-violent philosophy I am anxious to experience the reaction of Soviet officials and people to those of us who hold to the view that peace and justice are possible to the degree that the world uncompromisingly embraces the Judeo-Christian ideals.
I’m supposed to trust the FBI? Please
The womanizing could be true. It’s deeply unfortunate and is a sin many a Biblical figure was guilty of. The rest of the allegations is between MLK and God at this point (obviously.)
But to be frank, there are a lot of heroes our nation admires (and SHOULD admire) who were hardly saints!
I am personally fed up with all the self-righteous judgments against the founding fathers, for example...or even Confederate generals by the PC crowd lately...So why extend the same treatment to Martin Luther King Jr?
As I said in a prior post, even his namesake, Martin Luther of Reformation Germany was HARDLY perfect. He was viciously anti-Semitic and had a foul mouth among other things.
King’s associations with communists, particular a few of his most prevalent speech writers would have likely placed him permanently on a prohibition list. >>>Stanley David Levinson
The FBI file, titled “Martin Luther King, Jr. A Current Analysis” and dated March 12, 1968 was part of 553 files relating to the assassination of former president John F. Kennedy, released by the US National Archives in 2017.
Under the heading “Strong Communist Influence,” the FBI report discussed how King’s “principal advisor” was a Jew named Stanley David Levison.
The FBI report said: Another complicating factor in the picture is the degree of communist influence on King. One of King’s principal advisors is Stanley David Levison. Ostensibly only a NYC attorney and businessman, Levison is, in fact, a shrewd, dedicated communist. Levison has spent the major part of his life advancing communist interests.
He has actively involved himself in fund-raising drives for King, served as his legal counsel in certain-matters, suggested speech material for him, discussed with King demonstrations to be involved, guided him in regard to acceptance or rejection of various public appearances and speaking, and helped him with matters related to articles and books King has prepared.
Levison edited most of the chapters of King’s new ‘book entitled “Where Do We Go From Here; Chaos Or Community?” Levison wrote one chapter of this book and the publisher’s representative complained to King and Levison that it was obvious certain sections of the book were written by different, individuals.
Levison was the one who effectively controlled all of King’s public utterances.
Stanley Levison has told Clarence Jones, another advisor to King, that under no circumstances should King be permitted to say anything without their approving it. Levison also informed Jones that King is such a slow thinker he is usually not prepared to make statements without help from someone.
Under the heading “Subversives Attracted,” the FBI report provided further background to Levison, dealing with his formal position within the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA):
Stanley Levison was attracted to King and SCLC when King gained national attention. Levison soon developed a close relationship with King and was known in King’s group as “Assistant Chief.” In 1961, he was assistant treasurer of SCLC [Southern Christian Leadership Conference]. Prior to joining forces with King, Levison led a double like for the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA). Outwardly he was a successful businessman but he was also the clandestine fundraiser for the CPUSA. He was entrusted with raising and handling secret funds for the Party and used some of these funds to finance his own activities.
The reason King enjoyed this close relationship with communists is best explained by the fact that Levison, in February, 1962, passed the word to Gus Hall, General Secretary, CPUSA, “King is a whole-hearted Marxist who has studied it (Marxism), believes in it and agrees with it, but because of his being a minister of religion, does not dare to espouse it publicly.”
The FBI report then goes on to detail the full extent of the CPUSA’s involvement in the “Civil Rights” movement, and of how it was part of their plan to destroy America. In this regard, the FBI report shows that almost all of King’s advisors, speech writers, organizers, and personal assistants, were specifically recruited from within the ranks of the CPUSA, often by Levison himself.
The last section of the report deals entirely with King’s deviant sexual behavior which is not as bad as the earlier document dump in 2013 where he is yelling obscenities about fornicating for the Glory of God. ________________________________________________
So in the beginning, King plagiarized the bulk of his work: College, doctoral thesis, and his first speech at Ebenezer Church were not his material. Then he got involved with Levinson, his speech writer and the CPUSA became his guiding force and source. And Levinson became the puppeteer behind the magical persona.
King was a charismatic speaker that delivered an effective message. He was evolving into a cult type leader, given his charming effect on others, particularly women. He was a precursor to Obama.
Baptists in Russia? Did they exist? Russia is an overwhelmingly Russian Orthodox country. In the 1960’s the Christian Russian population were likely close to 90% Eastern Orthodox Christians. The Protestant or Baptist percentile under 1% and they likely spoke lots of Russian. King’s personal behavior, and that of his pastoral-peers, would be the polar opposite of Orthodox Christians. And the fractional Baptist Russian population is likely just as devout. If he started his antics over there, his trip would have been very short lived, indeed.
More importantly, I wonder what Levinson and CPUSA really had planned for King to do over there? And of all the places on the planet, why Russia?
It was sort of hushed up, except for the outrage that the FBI was spying on him.
What they did not do is release the details to destroy his reputation.
Of course, back then, if a girl went up to a man's motel room, she was presumed to be agreeing to sex. So it's not exactly “rape rape”, to quote Whoopie Goldberg.
Things have changed: Bill Cosby asked girls to go up to his hotel room for sex and offered them “downers” to take first, and even though they agreed to these things, now the girls now claim they are victims. Things have changed.
Although this article was highlighting the rape of a church lady, it appears that King never touched her. No need, he had an eager line of willing participants every where he traveled. He’s not the rapist in chief, just an amused bystander since it always been so easy for him.
MLK had ‘rock star’ appeal and actual groupies that showed up or passed him their phone numbers. And in addition to Mrs. King, he had three regular women that frequented his bed. He bedded two newbies the night he died and the third (a regular) got mad and he physically smacked her down, according to his closest friend and the successor of the CR movement.
MLK was a very busy man and had to have been physically exhausted with keeping such a schedule.
The FBI was probably very disappointed the night their free porno shows ended and King was dead.
They would be stuck listening or watching King reruns, the party was forever over!
His heirs could have marketed a ‘love potion’ / testosterone drink bearing his name.
[ And some of Cosby’s victims were complete incapacitated victims, he drugged them. They could not leave or resist. And that is false imprisonment or kidnapping in addition to rape.]
Comey is a damned fool. If he had read all the King files, he would have kept his damned fool mouth shut, but being an narcistic egomaniac, he couldn’t resist putting his big foot in it.
This Willard Hotel sexcapade might only be the first revealed such event with Dr. King, and not just in this country.
If Garrow stops being a leftist fool and does apply his considerable skills as a historian to looking at the larger picture, he will know that he has to rewrite his book “The FBI and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr” because he left out so much about King’s associates, many of whom were either Communist Party USA members or supporters (at various times - ie. Wyatt T. Walker, Ralph D. Abernathy who later defected from the Soviet KGB front, the World Peace Council, Stoney Cook (limited contacts), Rev. Willie Barrows (hardcore red - Castro supporter), and Rev. Jesse Jackson.
King’s top advisors/aides were admitted CPUSA member and KGB asset, Stanley Levison (Sen. Committee (Church Com) hearings/files on FBI operations), and the other half of the KGB sandwich, Jack O’Dell, aka Jack Vesey, aka Hunter Pitts O’Dell (House Comm. on Un-American Activities, “Communist Infiltration and Activities in the South”, 85th Congress, 2nd Session, July 29, 30 and 31, 1958, including his testimony - took the 5th).
Jackson hired O’Dell after he was supposedly fired by King from his SCLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference) for Operation Breadbasket, Op. PUSH and the Rainbow Coalition. O’Dell’s CPUSA and Soviet fronts record would be a book in its own right.
O’Dell was also Jackson’s key contact man with Papa Assad in Syria, Arafat (a KGB operative if you didn’t know already), behind the anti-Israel/pro-PLO Jackson platforms for the Democratic National Convention (and own presidential campaign plans for 1984 and 1988. One reason Jackson got his balls kicked in in 1988 was because one of the last true Roosevelt liberals put out the word that Jackson was a pawn for the Communists via O’Dell. Long story but maybe I can reveal it one day. I had a role in it.
Garrow started to expose the FBI’s top Kremlin penetration operation (Operation SOLO) in his books on the FBI and King, so the Bureau let former Naval Intelligence officer John Barron of the Readers Digest, release his long held book - Operation SOLO - about the FBI’s man in the Kremlin, Morris Childs, in 1995.
The operation was run by FBI Asst Dir for Counter-Intelligence Ray Wannall. I used to have lunch with both gentlemen and half the “spook” community from WW II and after (OSS, ONI, then the CIA, DIA, FBI etc).
Our guys knew what was going on and so did Hoover. McCarthy was a loose cannon but his information was accurate despite his nasty manner of running a congressional hearing. See the book “”Blacklisted by History”, M. Stanton Evans, on McCarthy. Stan was a friend and mentor, and published my second study on communism, the Senate being the first.
Talk about McDowell Luncheon Group/Accuracy in Media lunches. We had more prize winner writers in one room than most other places except the Press Club (that’s where I had lunch with some other Pulitzer Prize writers including Frank Kluckhon (sp), former Communist Party/then HCUA staffer Ben Mandel, a blessed memory, Latin American expert Daniel James (Guatemala), and others including Pulitzer winner Isaac Don Levine.
Today’s writers on the Left suck and always have. They were hacks back then and still are today, and some were just fools while others were traitors, but the NY Times and the Wash. Post kept publishing their trash as though is was the truth.
Today, with the new breed of journalists (Sullivan, Carter, Atkinson, Jarrett, DiGenova, Bongino, etc.), we are finally learning the truth about the Democrat corruption of the FBI, CIA, DNI and possibly the NSA. Their leaders range from incompetent to treasonous while the people I mentioned above (and didn’t mention such as my late father-in-law who helped stop any Soviet Bloc invasion of W. Germany, etc), are the real heros of America’s security.
One day all of this will come out IF the relevant documents are not DESTROYED at the National Archives. There is so much more to communist penetration of America than jut the civil rights movement, Hollywood, etc. The media was right up there as a target and willing disinformation/smear partner against real patriots, and if the files on scores of US congressmen/women/Senators and some of their staff were to be totally declassified, you’d be lining up for the firing squads needed to clean out the treason that has existed so long, protected by the Democrats and Soviet operatives posing as Democrats (Conyers Jr., Crockett, Hayes, Dellums (a Castro/Maurice Bishop man), the Burtons, etc.
This King/FBI story’s new turn is only the first step in exposing what the Democrats fear the most, that the American people will find out that they have been America’s “ENEMIES WITHIN” since the 1930’s, protected by FDR (Lauchlin Curie, Harry Hopkins, Hiss, White, Coe, Remington and some you’d never suspect as traitors), even Truman to some degree, then by Carter, Clinton and perhaps one of the Soviet’s top penetration successes, Barack Hussein Obama and some of his top staff.
The truth is out there, if you are willing to work and look for it instead of taking in leftist media slop and calling it Beef Burganion”.
#49. This is a white racist site. Includes David Duke among their speakers. Nuff said. Stay away from them and anything they write/say or think.
Do you have links (outside of the FBI) that states King took part in or was witness to women being raped? Being a philanderer is a far cry from a rapist.
Thus far, only Garrow reading the FBI summation of the event. As I read on about King, it is highly plausible that this rape actually occurred as the FBI documented.
Equally disturbing is the lack of response by the FBI listening live in the adjoining room. At what point do the FBI stop a crime? What if she or he was a minor child? Or if the rapist proceeded to beat, torture, or kill her? Why does the FBI witness this crime and merely spectate?
The FBI agents witnessing King’s orgies must have been terribly disappointed when their years of free PORN shows ended with King’s death.
King had a wife, three regular girlfriends, and a line of groupies and attendees from his sermons/ speeches seeking to have sex as he traveled. There were orgies on a regular basis. This scenario of a rape in his presence goes with the territory of those documented sexual activities.
While I did not go to the source, yet. This excerpt from “The American Citadel” came from the March 1968 document dump of a grouping of previously sealed JFK files. It details how King was coercing women to perform lesbian sex acts for the entertainment of onlookers.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf
https://theamericancitadel.com/2018/01/15/mlk-communist-revolutionary-plagiarizer-
degenerate/
-—King’s personal life was one of depravity and debauchery. He was a man of hedonistic excess. He lusted after alcohol and women and indulged himself with plenty of both. It is well-established that King frequently engaged in drunken sex orgies – especially on his road trips. The FBI report contained this account of an “urban leadership” conference hosted by King:
“One Negro minister in attendance later expressed his disgust with the behind-the-scenes drinking, fornication, and homosexuality that went on at the conference. Several Negro and white prostitutes were brought in from the Miami area. An all-night sex orgy was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates in attendance.
“One room had a large table in it which was filled with whiskey. The two Negro prostitutes were paid $50.00 to put on a sex show for the entertainment of guests. A variety of sex acts deviating from the normal were observed.” These types of despicable orgies were quite normal for King and his entourage. In the report, we find this description of King’s lecherous behavior:
“As early as January, 1964, King engaged in another two-day, drunken sex orgy in Washington, D.C. Many of those present engaged in sexual acts, natural as well as unnatural, for the entertainment of onlookers.
>>>When one of the females shied away from engaging in an unnatural act, King and other of the males present discussed how she was to be taught and initiated in this respect.
“Throughout the ensuing years and until this date King has continued to carry on his sexual aberrations secretly while holding himself out to public view as a moral leader of religious conviction.”
It was not enough that King himself was debauched; he felt the need to coerce women into lesbian acts for his own perverse entertainment. King was not a man of God, unless his god was the lord of the underworld, the instigator of sin, the Father of Lies. King was a hypocrite of the highest order – a charlatan who hoodwinked a nation with his flattering, but pitifully hollow, words. ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Actually, I have accepted the fact that Michael King was a perverted degenerate louse of the worse order and nothing further about his sexual exploits would be surprising; it fits his character. “.., judge a man by his character and not the color of his skin... blah, blah, blah.” Done that Mike King.
His blatant continuous plagiarism - intellectual theft of others ideas establishes his complete fraudulent nature. And if that does not shock or trouble your conscious, nothing will.
Most disturbing to me are the revelations of King’s ties, guidance, funding, support and involvement with the Communist Party coupled with his application with the State dept. to visit Russia in 1964 (it was refused.)
Communism & MLK -— http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3752321/posts?page=127#127
“One day all of this will come out IF the relevant documents are not DESTROYED at the National Archives. There is so much more to communist penetration of America than jut the civil rights movement, Hollywood, etc. The media was right up there as a target and willing disinformation/smear partner against real patriots, and if the files on scores of US congressmen/women/Senators and some of their staff were to be totally declassified, you’d be lining up for the firing squads needed to clean out the treason that has existed so long, protected by the Democrats and Soviet operatives posing as Democrats (Conyers Jr., Crockett, Hayes, Dellums (a Castro/Maurice Bishop man), the Burtons, etc.”
“This King/FBI story’s new turn is only the first step in exposing what the Democrats fear the most, that the American people will find out that they have been America’s “ENEMIES WITHIN” since the 1930’s, protected by FDR (Lauchlin Curie, Harry Hopkins, Hiss, White, Coe, Remington and some you’d never suspect as traitors), even Truman to some degree, then by Carter, Clinton and perhaps one of the Soviet’s top penetration successes, Barack Hussein Obama and some of his top staff.”
Thanks for posting that, MadMax.
It seems to me that people are nonchalant and dismissive of MLK’s Communist ties and the Communism within the Democrat party. People are uneducated, uninformed or just don’t care and dismiss the threat and the enemies within our borders.
However, an old rape allegation gets them riled up, and only because of the #MeToo Movement. Prior to that it was just rape-rape or rapey-rape. Take one for the team, if it advances the left/lib/prog agenda.
Hopefully, this will be a turning point for Garrow and he will unbury all the information he has not disclosed about King’s romance with Communism. He needs to tell the rest of the story about MLK and disclose the complete truth. Anything less is intellectually dishonest; just like Mike King.
I’m with you on this. I suspect it’s a trap to put President Trump against King’s family, and in effect against African-Americans.
With the exception of Bathsheba (which scandal God exposed in short order and punished David publicly), David’s wife and concubines were known to the public, and was the norm for kings to attempt to ensure family successors to the throne. The scriptures show (especially David’s personal life) the negative and even tragic results of the multiple wife marriages, with the Lord Jesus making it absolutely clear: one man and one woman.
MLK couldn’t own up to his behavior and keep his stature in the Christian community.
IMO, he tried to serve two masters. I far as I know the man did not preach the Acts 2:38 conversion commanded by the Lord, and first delivered by Peter.
You have no clue, you believe what you believe because you want it to be true, it isn't. The Myth of MLK was fashioned for a reason and your irrational belief is proof it worked.
I have no clue if the rape scene depicted in the last release is true but I have no reason to not believe it because it goes along with the general life style of the group but it has no bearing on my belief that MLK was a deeply flawed hero.
You have no clue what the FBI found or didn't find you only know what was revealed. Bear in mind that some Presidents wield a little more power over their administration than others.
There are rarely absolute truths in politics there are merely accepted truths generally designed to protect someone like the Warren Commission Truth or the TWA 800 Truth all manufactured to protect someone. I have no doubt that the FBI is often ordered to produce untrue reports. During the Hoover reign I suspect he often blackmailed his Boss and resisted certain instructions but I never doubted his love of country, I couldn't say that the same of a bunch of the later Directors.
The sun will come up in the morning, I count on that but if it doesn't, what does it matter to me? Same is true of your opinion.
I know, how dare I compare a philanderer to a philanderer. The shame! However that wasn’t my point and somehow I think that you know this. However you have an animus towards King. Traitor? For what appears thus far to be merely accusations? I wonder what your motivations are to trash King. Since I cannot read your mind I’ll withhold judgment.
I didn’t vote for Saint Trump. I voted for his presidency because he made his case and has done wonderfully. With respect to the rape allegations I’m withholding judgment on King until all the facts are in. I still see him for what he did for civil rights. Just as I see Trump for what he has done for this country which thus far has been wonderful things. I don’t get all emotional at the mere mention of his name. He is a man, he is imperfect, he is our President not our idol.
Fair enough and I respect that view. Whatever his beliefs were his alliances didn’t kill a single American here on our soil. However our continued alliances with Saudis kill Americans each day serving abroad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.