Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Excellent.

I hope he is ready to indict and prosecute those responsible.

1 posted on 05/14/2019 10:43:20 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Innovative

“Durham, known as a “hard-charging, bulldog” prosecutor, according to a source, will focus on the period before Nov. 7, 2016—including the use and assignments of FBI informants, as well as alleged improper issuance of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants. Durham was asked to help Barr to “ensure that intelligence collection activities by the U.S. Government related to the Trump 2016 Presidential Campaign were lawful and appropriate.”


2 posted on 05/14/2019 10:44:31 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
You don't bring in a US Attorney to investigate. You bring in a US Attorney to prosecute.

If Durham didn't think crimes had been committed he would have refused the job from Barr. BUT, if Durham thinks the law has been broken, he's a bulldog about getting to the roots of it.

AND he will leave no stone unturned.

4 posted on 05/14/2019 10:57:45 AM PDT by Wizdum (The Dems are not afraid a wall won't work, the Dems are TERRIFIED a wall WILL work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

They are going to have to work fast in order to get this done before 2020.


5 posted on 05/14/2019 11:00:54 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
In 1999 AG Janet Reno appointed Durham to investigate law enforcement corruption in Boston, and under AG Eric Holder Durham was selected to investigate matters relating to the destruction of videotapes by the CIA and treatment of detainees by the CIA.

Reno and Holder chose Durham to lead investigations.

7 posted on 05/14/2019 11:11:18 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

And, in the event that there are any foreign governments involved, out their participation.


8 posted on 05/14/2019 11:13:00 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Twitter says Durham has been on the case since October of 2018. His name came up in a January House hearing.

This could get good faster than we thought!


12 posted on 05/14/2019 11:23:53 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Will the lefties be more angry because:
A. This is being investigated, or
B. It began without them being notified?

The world wonders.

I'll go make some popcorn...

17 posted on 05/14/2019 11:33:43 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Got a few thousand Federal Prosecutors hanging around on staff?

Put them to work. Cry Havoc! ...and loose the dogs of War!


19 posted on 05/14/2019 11:37:40 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

What this investigation needs is a very high level flip. Someone high enough to know exactly what happened, and who did what.

Paging Mr. Rod Rosenstein.


20 posted on 05/14/2019 11:40:22 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Who cares, lock her up!


21 posted on 05/14/2019 11:47:21 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

FBI Director Wray and DNI Dan Coats are dirty.


25 posted on 05/14/2019 12:06:16 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I don’t think Durham is going to tarnish his reputation by doing a sham investigation. He has proven his willingness to prosecute corrupt FBI agents. Why stop now.

Mueller has been a long-time friend of Barr, but I have to believe that relationship has changed. Appointing Durham to handle this case takes Barr out of the picture as to Mueller’s criminal conduct. Barr will not protect Mueller, and the close friendship between their wives will not be a factor.


26 posted on 05/14/2019 12:15:12 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Rush had something today that makes me think Barr will take the investigation where it ought to go. In the course of the conspiracy between Whitey Bulgier and the Boston office of the FBI four innocent men were imprisoned on false murder convictions that the FBI helped to obtain. Robert Muller was not a part of that initial conspiracy but, when he became US Attorney with his jurisdiction including Boston, he learned about it and the innocence of those four men and did nothing to exonerate them.

Then, after Clinton was elected President in 1992, Janet Reno became AG and appointed John Durham US Attorney to investigate the Boston FBI scandal. Durham exposed it and, in the process, exonerated those four men, even though he knew what Mueller had done.

If Barr were out to cover up this present scandal he'd not have appointed Durham the lead counsel to investigate it in light of Durham's role in the Boston FBI scandal, IMHO.

29 posted on 05/14/2019 12:18:50 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
When will Comey send us another picture of trees.

I have a gut feeling that his attorney has now told him to shut up. Why?? Because he's going after peoples reputations to make himself look good.

Saint James exceeded his authority when he deemed Hillary as innocent as a babe....and leaked to the press...and I'm pretty sure he's lying through his teeth when he says the FBI wasn't spying.

He can check with Brennan on "spying and lying".

30 posted on 05/14/2019 12:36:55 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/faa61d8336fae04c00ed1d3ce0086565636ee7867ea54a415ce672dc8a54e68c.jpg


38 posted on 05/14/2019 1:58:45 PM PDT by victim soul (victim soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Has the digital age numbed us to the point we no longer care about liberty?


41 posted on 05/14/2019 2:16:26 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
US attorney John Durham has been reviewing origins of Russia probe 'for weeks': source...Funny Juan Williams on "Outnumbered" today - just couldn't understand why investigation was needed - when someone asked as an example why the FBI never informed Trump that his campaign was being investigated for possible Russian collusion, Juan said that it was because they thought Trump himself was involved - yeah Juan - that's the idea - where did that assumption of Trump's involvement come from originally, and why did the FBI allow it to influence their investigation - especially since Mueller has now shown it to be wrong......
42 posted on 05/14/2019 2:29:34 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Very important for him to have been working for a while on this. Keeps targets from covering their tracks too soon.



44 posted on 05/14/2019 3:18:26 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Liberalism is what Smart looks like to Stupid people - ® - Mia of KC. Rush - 1:50-8/21/15))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

The first IG Report produced ZERO indictments, Huber in Utah zip, this will conclude while mistakes were made no indictments.

Democrats get a free pass.


45 posted on 05/14/2019 3:31:21 PM PDT by stockpirate (TYRANNY IS THY NAME REBELLION IS OUR ANSWER. HANG THEM ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I think Durham is pretty smart.

Some of the first people he interviewed, according to Fox Business, were Wray, Hospel and Coates.
Those three, in my opinion, were all present for the last two years and I feel very strongly that they are part of the attempted coup.

If it were I doing the investigation, I would absolutely want to get those three to tell me their “stories.”

I think he is doing the right thing, because those three did not do the right thing when all of this was going down.


48 posted on 05/14/2019 4:32:57 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson