[Secret Agent Man]

We are not a demographic that believes people we know despise us for being white and male.

If you think women don’t like sexism and racism pandering, we’ve got them beat in hating that, in spades.

we do not suffer those that have designs to murder us off, that say, the world would be better off without us. The massive benefits of the world we live in, that everyone takes for grnated, would not exist without us.

[Sa-teef]

More hate from the wacky intolerant left.

Go build your own bridges and highways, cars and homes.

[DaxtonBrown]

I laughed throughout the entire article. Schadenfreude

[Crucial]

Being white=bigotry according to liberals. This was the first of many reasons I never really voted Democrat and will never vote Democrat in the future. They just don’t change.

[canuck_conservative]

So the Democrats have figured out they need white voters ...

yet they continue to portray whites as racist bigots, constantly denounce the alleged “white privilege”, demand whites step aside to make opportunities for minorities, and now demand that Whitey pay reparations ...

they really think this is a winning strategy??

[nathanbedford]

The posters who were encouraged by this article or who actually read it laughing apparently did not read and certainly did not heed these data:

College-educated white women do seem to be leaving the Republican party long-term; a 51 percent majority voted for Hillary Clinton, and a larger 59 percent majority voted blue in the midterms.

I wasn't laughing when the results came in from the 2018 midterm elections.

The Republicans lost the midterms in the suburbs and lost it their primarily because they lost eight points from white, educated females. We white conservative males reading this feminists tripe might be truculent, we might be smug, we might be oblivious but Democrat professionals are not. They look at these numbers and they are encouraged for 2020. That is why virtually every male Democrat candidate for president is coming out of the starting gate proclaiming that he will select a female vice president.

This swing cost us the House of Representatives and it could very well cost us the White House in 2020. Hillary could not energize this female vote just as she could not energize the African-American vote. How about Kamela Harris, could she energize both? It does no good to bluster about race wars, the need is to understand why suburban white women departed the party in 2018 and get them back into the fold where they were in 2016.

I think it is a given that Trump will get out his base but the map of the electoral college is such that his narrow victories in the rust belt might be overturned if these women vote the way they voted in 2018. We cannot count on having a presidential candidate with the toxic baggage that cost Hillary Clinton the election she should have won. She was a singularly unlikable human being with a public record of corruption a mile-long. We shall not be so fortunate in 2020.

So the Democrats are trying to appeal to displaced non-college educated white male voters in the rust belt and Republicans should be appealing to white suburban college-educated women in the suburbs. That is why we see Bernie Sanders so artfully co-opting much of the Trump message and that is why we see male Democrat candidates promising female vice presidents.

In 2020 we must demonstrate to American mothers that their children are at risk at school, on the streets, in the hospitals from open borders. Their husbands are at risk on the job from open immigration. There health care is at risk from crazy schemes. The Democrats have demonstrated with Russia Gate that they cannot be trusted with power. Finally, they must be convinced that a Democrat victory will tear away all of the prosperity for them and their families created by Trump.

The question is, how does one craft a message to reach these women and how does one craft a message to reach an even more difficult demographic, single women. As Sigmund Freud said, "what does a woman want?" I certainly do not know, but I do know that threatening civil war is probably not the best method of persuasion or seduction.

[wastoute]

I wonder if it occurs to anyone that calling Trump and white males Nazis may not be the way to get them? That in fact it might just have some pretty serious unintended consequences?

[mewzilla]

This is interesting. I can’t find a dang thing about DAME Media LLC, the outfit that owns DAME magazine.

Anyone know who they are?

[Pollard]

>>>63 percent of whom voted Trump in 2016<<<

We can’t help it if we’re the smart ones.

[Petrosius]

If this article does not show the anti-white bigotry and misandry of the modern left, I do not know what would.

[lurk]

So, they want the white man dead, but they still want him to do their plumbing and electrical, and they want his vote.

Dems acting like a crazy girlfriend.

[FLT-bird]

This is typical of the kind of blinding hatred the Left routinely speed at anybody in this country who committed the terrible “crime” of being born with a white penis.

I honestly have no idea how any White male could vote for the Democrats. They’ve made it clear how much they hate you. Wake up. Voting for them would be like a turkey voting for Thanksgiving dinner.

[Buckeye McFrog]

A decade of Leftist Democrat Insanity has turned the electorate into Humpty Dumpty. They’ll never be able to put the pieces back together again.

[trebb]

I agree - I hope the Dems go on an even more rabid war against White men....the only way to romance/appeal to them is to recant all the claims they have been making against us and then lie their asses off about why they are the better choice....probably only a few would bite but even more will come to Trump if they just continue what they have been doing...

[gogeo]

Nor does the Sanders strategy—capturing the xenophobic FOX News vote by stripping progressivism of “identity politics”—bear up to reality testing. White opposition to socialist policies, for example, often springs directly from racism.

She says that's "reality."