Posted on 02/20/2019 6:54:36 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) has been undergoing trials and combat systems outfitting in and around her home port of San Diego. The ship's metamorphosis into an operational combat ship is something we have been following closely. Recently, we reported on additions to her stealthy frame that would only hurt the size of radar signature. These included an exposed mast and a number of communications aerials bolted directly onto her deckhouse instead of being integrated into it seamlessly. Now, a new photo shows her fitted with twin 30mm Bushmaster cannons for the very first time.
The Zumwalt class, as we know it today, is a shadow of what it was originally envisioned to be. The vessel's capabilities and low-observable design have been progressively watered-down as part of an ongoing initiative to save money. With just three of the vessels being built, all of which are now in the water, the Navy decided to largely cut their losses and move on from trying to make the once billed as transformational Zumwalt class ships all that they could be. You can read all about this saga in this past special feature of ours.
The ramifications of producing just three vessels of the class and the cost cuts that came with it have gone so far as making the ship's 155mm Advanced Gun Systems (AGS), which takes up nearly the forward third of the entire ship, totally useless. Its ammo became too expensive to purchase in small quantities. Not long after this revelation, the Navy changed the class's mission to focus more on standoff strike and anti-surface warfare. It is possible that even nuclear strike could also be added sometime in the future.
Regardless, at this point, there is a real possibility that the AGS will be torn out of the ships entirely without ever firing a shot.
USN
Mk46 cannon being fired aboard a San Antonio class ship.
Another one of these cost cutting measures was swapping out the 57mm Mk110 guns mounted in stealthy cupolas above the ship's hangar with 30mm Bushmaster cannons that were not specifically adapted to conform to the ship's reduced radar signature. The Bushmasters were quite literally 'off the shelf' as they are found on the service's Littoral Combat Ships equipped with the Surface Warfare Mission Package and on San Antonio class amphibious assault ships. The idea was that money could be saved by switching to the far less capable system, both in terms of acquisition and integration, as well as sustainment over time.
USN
MK110 gun system firing away aboard the Littoral Combat Ship USS Freedom.
It's worth noting that the 57mm Mk110 deck guns are also in service aboard the Navy's Littoral Combat Ships, so it's not as if an entirely new system was being added to the Navy's logistical network. The 30mm Bushmasters are cheaper in every respect, but they are also in a completely different class, capability-wise.
USNI News noted that the 57mm guns fire at a rate of 220 rounds per minute and have a range of over nine miles, while the 30mm Bushmaster fires at up to 200 rounds per minute and has a range just over two miles. The 57mm also has far greater destructive power and some very exciting 'smart' ammunition options that the 30mm lacks entirely.
The Mk110 guns would have been integrated into the Zumwalt's advanced combat system. The 30mm Bushmaster, on the other hand, is a standalone and self contained system that is as close to 'plug and play' as you can get for the capability it provides. The operator literally sits inside the cupola and directs the cannon using thermal and electro-optical sensors built into the turret.
The Navy issued the following response to USNI's 2014 report on the matter:
At the time of DDG 1000 Critical Design Review in 2005, the MK110 (57mm) close-in gun system (CIGS) was selected to meet the DDG 1000 ORD Key Performance Parameter. The basis of that decision was the expected performance of the gun and its munition, coupled with desire for commonality in USN and USCG. Through 2010, various analysis efforts were conducted to assess the performance of potential cost-saving alternatives to the Mk 110 CIGS, for both procurement and life-cycle costs. The results of the analysis for alternative systems to the MK110 CIGS were not conclusive enough to recommend a shift in plan.
A follow on 2012 assessment using the latest gun and munition effectiveness information, concluded that the MK46 was more effective than the MK110 CIGS. Based on that assessment, approval was received to change from the MK 110 CIGS to the MK 46 Gun System. In addition to the increased capability, the change from MK110 to MK46 resulted in reduction in weight and significant cost avoidance, while still meeting requirements. DDG 1000 is planned to have two medium range MK46, 30mm Close-in Gun Systems that will provide a robust rapid fire capability and increased lethality against hostile surface targets approaching the ship.
You can take this statement anyway you like, but similar ones have been par for the course when it comes to justifying the Zumwalt class's decaying capabilities. Everything from the ship's drastically downgraded radar system to its low-observable design have been justified ambiguously by the term 'still meeting requirements,' albeit the exact nature of those requirements, or how fluid they have been, remain largely undisclosed.
USN
MK46 Bushmaster cannons seen aboard a Freedom class LCS with Surface Warfare Mission Package installed.
It's also unclear what level of impact the installation of the Bushmaster cannons will have on the ship's radar cross-section. The 57mm guns were designed to be encapsulated in stealthy turreted cupolas when not in use. The fact that they were integrated into the ship's combat system also meant they were mounted lower on the upper hangar enclosure in their wedge-shaped, faceted cupolas. The 30mm guns will not be concealed at all, they sit higher atop a trapezoidal structure with their turrets and barrels always exposed.
POXNAR/WIKICOMMONS
Mk110 gun system in a stealthy copula seen on a Swedish Visby class corvette.
Still, the 30mm cannons will help the Zumwalt class put up some defense against potential small boat attacks. The ship's stealthy design made incorporating 25mm chain guns, which are the primary heavy-duty force protection armament on US Navy surface combatants, not possible. But the added capabilities the Mk110 offered, from possessing four times the range and far more stopping power than the Bushmasters, to being able to potentially counter some aerial threats if the Navy wished to integrate that capability, that were lost by the switch is significant regardless of how the Navy tries to spin it.
We also have to stress that all of these cost reduction measures have a cumulative impact on the Zumwalt's ability to wage war and where they can do it. In fact, maybe the persistent degradation of the vessel's low observable design is a good metaphor as any for its overall combat capability. Each small change may not be damning in itself, but they add up over time to the point that one really has to ask what did the Navy buy here after spending tens of billions of dollars on the program? And most importantly, after spending all that money developing and building these ships, is spending a comparatively tiny amount more to get these vessels to perform as they were originally envisioned to really not worth it?
In the end, the Zumwalt class will likely prove itself to be hugely capable even in its final downgraded form. But with just three vessels built, the tiny fleet is more likely to be part of an experimental force that eventually cannibalizes itself just to stay alive in any form than the game-changing fleet of stealthy ships that the program was originally envisioned to be. But even lessons learned from their existence will be more limited because of their compromised state.
It's just troubling that even before they set sail operationally, the DDG-1000s already have us wondering 'what could have been.'
Editor's note: A big thanks to our friend MrWasabi for letting us use his photo for this piece.
Good job!
I think it was President Jelly Jar that axed these ships
So, rail guns aren’t going to sea in the near future - at least with the US Navy.
Update the Fletcher class.
What did he axe them?
So, it's not totally helpless....
>>>>So, rail guns aren’t going to sea in the near future - at least with the US Navy.<<<<<
They might. The gun that was axed was not a rail gun. While this ship was being built, it was thought the rail gun tech would be realized in time to use it on this ship. That is why this class produces so much electricity. However when the rail gun wasn’t ready a special gun was installed to use a type of ammo that had a rocket assist. The range iirc was bout 100 miles with fins and stuff and guidance to make it hit coordinates precisely. The only problem was that the ammo was so darn expensive. This is in contrast to the rail gun. Where the ammo is dirt cheap. So the ship was a fail. It was supposed to be expensive to build, but cheap to fight/train with. Now it was also expensive to fight/train with too.
I watched them test the 30mm guns on TV. One of them failed (needed a replacement part for the mount). The other one was dead on.
What members of Congress supported this boondoggle?
Congress gearing up to fight WWII again.
Another gubment blunderfest. Does anyone ever get punished enough to make others pay more attention to their work? It can’t all be blamed on the capriciousness of politicians and appropriations.
They damn well better focus on the stealth. Because if someone knows they are there they sure as hell can’t shoot their way out if it.
Besides, these days with women drivers crashing them into tankers, instead of stealth they really need radar reflectors, a rotating beacon and a dayglow orange paint job.
Why not just use rockets or missiles even?
Making a gun do what a rocket or missile does seems completely unnecessary.
Where are the battleships? The carriers? Oh, never mind, we still build those floating targets while China builds carrier "islands".
——prove itself to be hugely capable ——
capable of what? what purpose will the vessel serve?
“Yes, but these go up 11..”
Yes, it’s a rocket, but now we fire it from a cannon...
Saw one of these at the Bath Iron Works in Maine. Funky looking.
When they cut the class back to only three ships, all the development costs for the ships and every weapon of feature specific to that limited use also had to pay for itself in the small number produced.
The ship had been envisioned to replace the usage of large battleships in Sea to Land artillery and missile fire. A littoral ship.
Wiki does a nice summary saying:
The ship is designed around its two Advanced Gun Systems, their turrets and magazines, and unique Long Range Land Attack Projectile (LRLAP) ammunition.[9] LRLAP procurement was cancelled, rendering the guns unusable,[9] so the Navy is re-purposing the ships for surface warfare.[12]
The special ammunition ran up to 800k per shell since only three ships could have used them and the Navy scraped the whole deal since they aren’t thrilled with the handling and other features.
Can we say “gunboat”? A very expensive one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.