WaPo Columnist: Kamala Harris’ Personal “Love Life” Should Be Out Of Bounds

Hotair ^ | 01/30/2019 | Jazz Shaw

[PGR88]

Just like Trump’s, right?

[Moonman62]

It wasn’t personal. It was her career.

[ClearCase_guy]

Consistency is not important to these people.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

[CMSMC]

I agree.... Just as out of bounds as she made Brett Kavanaugh’s. #HORIZONTALHARRIS.

[FrankR]

[Red Badger]

Her ‘personal life’ was her career...................

[BenLurkin]

Vo4daHo!

[Pilgrim's Progress]

Unless it is fictitious and applied to men like Brett Kavanaugh or Clarence Thomas.

[DPMD]

Love life? Are we sure that love was even a factor in her ambitions and willie’s willie’s goals?

[marron]

Nothing wrong with examining Trump’s private life as a window into his character. Lying about him, however, and “trumped up” charges should be off limits.

The same should apply to Kamala. We promise not to lie about her private life. We don’t promise to ignore it, though obviously her policies and philosophy are of far more importance where political power is concerned.

[papertyger]

There IS no “out of bounds,” anymore.

[irishjuggler]

Exactly. When your paramour is appointing you to cushy, high-paying state commissions, it’s not your personal business anymore. It’s the public’s business.

[poinq]

They are out of bounds for democrats.

[Bonemaker]

“...“unique harm we cause” when examining the “love life” of a powerful woman.”

But it’s ok to destroy men that way ...and falsely at that.

[I want the USA back]

But Trump’s shouldn’t be?

[freedumb2003]

It isn’t a marriage fidelity issue.

It is a whoring on the taxpayer dollar issue. Sex in exchange for a no-work job. That is pure prostitution with the taxpayers picking up the tab.

It isn’t going away and it is NOT out of bounds.

But thanks to the author for bringing it up.

[SERKIT]

Washington Post: A bunch of Poontronage Deniers!

[griswold3]

It’s just ‘sex’ unless it’s a Conservative or Republican.