Lady Gaga, R. Kelly song removed from streaming services, YouTube

UPI ^ | 1/11/19 | Wade Sheridan

[Libloather]

Jan. 11 (UPI) -- Lady Gaga's 2013 single "Do What U Want (With My Body)" featuring R. Kelly has been removed from music streaming services.

Gaga promised on Twitter Wednesday that the track would be removed in response to the multiple sexual assault allegations that Kelly is facing.

Official music videos for "Do What U Want (With My Body)" were also removed from YouTube, however, a video of Gaga and Kelly performing the song at the American Music Awards remains.

[a fool in paradise]

I thought Ms.Gaga was apologizing for making a song in 2013 with R.Kelly when she was approximately 27 years old.

Your point is?

[PrincessB]

Your third sentence. I haven’t watched it yet but a friend did. What shocked her was how many women defended him.

Trump also said something once about women and what they will let you do because you are famous.....

[teevolt]

My kids think I’m nuts because I like to get physical copies of movies, music, and books. One reason is I can imagine these items being deleted or altered to be more PC (like the digital replacing of shotguns for radios in E.T.). If it turns out I am nuts, so be it.

[EEGator]

“You’re too shy shy, hush hush, eye to eye...”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gsRWhq1uIc

[grania]

There is no freedom of speech. Without that, freedom of thought is seriously curtailed. Is mine the last generation who cherished individual differences?

[Yaelle]

Whoops. I was wrong. I didn’t check what you were responding to. I thought you were quoting one of the underaged victims because many of them had wanted to “be a singer.”

I HUMBLY APOLOGIZE. I’m sorry I overreacted. And yes, that applies to Lady Gaga, what you said. Especially if she knew.

[dfwgator]

That singer is queerer than a three-dollar bill.

[Liz]

Movie industry types called for the release of director Roman Polanski. Generous to a fault, they gave
$34,000 to Obama’s presidential campaign and to the Democratic Party, FEC records show......
the most generous Democratic was Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein who Meryl Streep called "a god."
Harvey called on “every US filmmaker to lobby against bringing Polanski back to the US, where he could face life in jail.”.......

Good ponts.

======================================

One of the buried stories of the Clinton-lewinsky era is how Hollywood came to Clinton's rescue. Harvey weinstein loomed large in this.

REFERENCE---Hollyweirdos rallied around Clinton to fund his lewinsky sex mess defense. Herewith are the Certified Democrat Degenerates......the scum that vilify and destroy America's Judeo-Christian ethics and values in movies promoted as being "diverse, politically correct, and socially relevant."

HOLLYWOOD'S CERTIFIED DEMOCRAT DEGENERATES
FINANCED BILL CLINTON'S LEWINSKY SEX MESS

According to FEC Info, an Internet Web site (www.tray.com) that tracks federal political contributions, 176 individual donors actually contributed $10,000 or more to the lewinsky-era Clinton Legal Expense Trust fund through Dec 1999. Another 21 donors gave $10,000 in the first six months of 2000.

Thanks to Hollywood's generosity, a total of more than $2.2 million was raised in six months, which was notably more than was collected in funding during the previous four years of his presidency—combined. Hollywood producers and stars made up the bulk of the most generous givers. They included:

<><> Universal Studios tycoon Lew Wasserman and his wife, Edith, who have given $60,000;

<><>DreamWorks trio Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, $20,000 each;

<><> producer Ron Burkle and his wife, Janet, $40,000;

<><> producers Peg and Bud Yorkin, $30,000;

<><> TV producer Norman Lear, $20,000.

Entertainment celebrities and executives giving $10,000 included:

<><> singers Tony Bennett and Barbra Streisand;

<><> actors Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks;

<><> director Ron Howard; producer Gail Zappa;

<><>Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson.

======================================

When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was —Harvey Weinstein.

Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. That’s small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year. Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2) Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.

Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.

Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route?
Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams? There has been no exposition on how exactly the Hollywood elite listed payments to Clinton's sex defense fund:

<><> Did Harvey's company list these payments as "business expenses?"

<><> how did they list the donations on their tax returns?

<><> How did publicly-traded companies list their donations on shareholder reports?

<><>How did the "DreamWorks" trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton's sex defense fund?

<><> How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?

The biggie, of course, is the tax element.

<><> Did donors deduct it as a “business expense”,

<><> was it included in assets, payments listed on organization balance sheets as a "liability?"

<><> Did Clinton document it as "income"?

<><> Were the donors given a tax-free certificate from the Clinton Foundation?

[the OlLine Rebel]

Maybe the slut should’ve thought about what kind of content she puts out, period. Doesn’t matter who sang it, it’s all disgusting.

Maybe these assholes will start seeing how their immoral lyrics influence this behavior as it is.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

Lady Gaga's 2013 single "Do What U Want (With My Body)" featuring R. Kelly has been removed from music streaming services.

Yeah, the news reports, videos and testimony about R. Kelly have been out there a lot longer than 2013. She needed him then and was willing to overlook the mountains of evidence that R. Kelly is a pedophile and a pervert. She doesn't need him anymore, so it's time for the moral posturing.

LOL - "Do What U Want (With My Body)" - she actually made a song with R. Kelly with this title. Knowing everything he actually does to his victims. But then, she's not 15, so she probably felt safe.

[EEGator]

With a band named Kajagoogoo, I am not the least bit surprised.

Next you’re going to tell me Culture Club had a queer lead singer...

[blueunicorn6]

Imagine my surprise when I found out Queen wasn’t a tribute band to British royalty.

[EEGator]

“We are the Champions” isn’t about the 1966 World Cup either...

[tbw2]

If only the scifi world was equally dedicated to condemning pedophilia.

The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSo1tJZCMkc

[bgill]

Funny, we haven’t seen any filthy rap songs being pulled.

[bgill]

Funny, we haven’t seen any filthy rap songs being pulled.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

If only the scifi world was equally dedicated to condemning pedophilia.

The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon

I didn't see the video, but if it's about Marion Zimmer Bradley, I've seen several articles about her abuse of her children, and all were pretty firm in condemning her. Very sick and depraved woman. Pretty shocking - I remember reading The Mists of Avalon a lot of years ago.

[discostu]

Not down the memory hole at all. There’s like 6 versions still up there including with R Kelly. All that got removed was the officially sanctioned version that got R Kelly and Gaga 1/1,000,000 of a penny every time somebody watches..

[a fool in paradise]

you are talking about bootleggers, you acknowledged it being removed officially from yourube.

take down notices will go out to the bootleggers.

it’s also been removed from Spotify.

single
https://open.spotify.com/album/6dr8p9M8DSZzX5dXVCjJ0h

album
https://open.spotify.com/album/705K6lFN9wm3bifelyuQS4

[tbw2]

Yes, her.