Posted on 01/10/2019 1:39:56 PM PST by nikos1121
Given that California Sen. Kamala Harriss Wikipedia biography states that she was born in Oakland, CA in 1964 to immigrant parents and speculation exists that she plans to run for president in 2020, Golden State citizen Gary Wilmott has been seeking information as to her citizenship status and whether or not she meets the constitutional requirement of natural born Citizen.
The Wikipedia entry states that Harriss mother, Dr. Shyamala G. Harris, was from India, arriving in Berkeley, CA in 1960.
(snip)
Kamalas father, Donald Harris, was born in Jamaica and naturalized in the U.S. but does not provide the year.
Neither parent reportedly was present in the U.S. as a legal resident for five years prior to Harriss birth, a requirement to apply for naturalization, Wilmott observed in an interview with The Post & Email on Thursday.
(snip)
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 mandates that a president be a NATURAL-born citizen, which you clearly are not. At the time of your birth, BOTH of your parents were citizens of foreign countries, so your birth in California makes you at best a NATIVE-born citizen (anchor baby?) under the prevailing view of the 14th Amendment. Lest you think that I have Republican bias I would also point out that presidential wannabes Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio also fail to meet this higher standard of citizenship. Their campaigns were fraudulent and in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution.
He reported that his letter received no response.
Early last month, Wilmott wrote Harris a second letter asking about her parents naturalization or absence thereof:
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
The article implies that Kamala Harris is CLEARLY not a natural born citizen of the US. We should have this issue resolved NOW, not later.
” We should have this issue resolved NOW, not later. “
Suggestions?
She ineligible for the simple fact that she is a dickhead.
Kamala Harris is eligible.
Birthers invented a fictitious standard of eligibility that defined Natural Born Citizen to require a candidates parents to be citizens under the delusion that this would nullify Obamas presidency. It is a standard found nowhere in the Constitution or in any court decision. Its pure nonsense.
Kamala Harris will face no serious challenge to her eligibility should she decide to run.
Article list a fella named Wilmot (?) who has sent Harris two letters, asking how she thinks she qualifies to run for president, when she is NOT a natural born citizen.
It is bound to come up, certainly other candidates would have standing.
The timid GOP and our SCOTUS would not question Obama.
In this case, she is clearly not meeting the requirements.
No she is too stupid
There are several article out there on this. This is the same article that I just posted.
based on the stated facts of her parentage, she is definitely not eligible.
would the American public (and GOP-Excrement) let us get phuqued over Again, after 8 years of BO? I doubt it...after all that damage....but...some here on FR have said...yes
The articles are clearly listed in the constitution. I just posted them.
It is resolved, as far as the official legal and political system is concerned.
Only chance for a challenge would be for the relevant election official or board to refuse to put her on a primary ballot.
If she were to get the nomination, she would almost certainly not face serious challenge. It would be considered purely political question at that point, to be resolved by voters.
No, you didn't. The "two citizen parent" requirement to be considered a NBC is found nowhere in the Constitution.
Believe me, I've been through this before.
“would the American public (and GOP-Excrement) let us get phuqued over Again, after 8 years of BO? “
It is a standard found nowhere in the Constitution or in any court decision.
NBC is a term of art found in deVattels Law of Nations. The Framers had copies of deVattels work.
.. she’ll even cite the Kenyan as precedence that even martians can be president of the US of A.
or saudi princes/ mugabes ...
“five years prior to Harriss birth, a requirement to apply for naturalization”
Cite the law that specifies this.
If she were to get the nomination, she would almost certainly not face serious challenge.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You think President Trump would roll over like McLame did?
Under our court system, if Stalin or Hitler were alive and living in California, they would be eligible.
And our press wouldn’t have a problem with Russian collusion if Stalin ran.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.