Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Kamala Harris Eligible to be President?
The Post & Email ^ | Sunday, August 19, 2018· | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 01/10/2019 1:39:56 PM PST by nikos1121

Given that California Sen. Kamala Harris’s Wikipedia biography states that she was born in Oakland, CA in 1964 to immigrant parents and speculation exists that she plans to run for president in 2020, Golden State citizen Gary Wilmott has been seeking information as to her citizenship status and whether or not she meets the constitutional requirement of “natural born Citizen.”

The Wikipedia entry states that Harris’s mother, Dr. Shyamala G. Harris, was from India, arriving in Berkeley, CA in 1960.

(snip)

Kamala’s father, Donald Harris, was born in Jamaica and naturalized in the U.S. but does not provide the year.

Neither parent reportedly was present in the U.S. as a legal resident for five years prior to Harris’s birth, a requirement to apply for naturalization, Wilmott observed in an interview with The Post & Email on Thursday.

(snip)

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 mandates that a president be a NATURAL-born citizen, which you clearly are not. At the time of your birth, BOTH of your parents were citizens of foreign countries, so your birth in California makes you at best a NATIVE-born citizen (anchor baby?) under the prevailing view of the 14th Amendment. Lest you think that I have Republican bias I would also point out that presidential wannabes Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio also fail to meet this higher standard of citizenship. Their campaigns were fraudulent and in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution.

He reported that his letter received no response.

Early last month, Wilmott wrote Harris a second letter asking about her parents’ naturalization or absence thereof:

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: kamalaharris; lastyear; naturalborn; nope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
Here we go again.

The article implies that Kamala Harris is CLEARLY not a natural born citizen of the US. We should have this issue resolved NOW, not later.

1 posted on 01/10/2019 1:39:56 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

” We should have this issue resolved NOW, not later. “

Suggestions?


2 posted on 01/10/2019 1:41:21 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
HARRIS-HAT-RING
3 posted on 01/10/2019 1:41:34 PM PST by FrankR (Make America Great Again, and Keep It That Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

She ineligible for the simple fact that she is a dickhead.


4 posted on 01/10/2019 1:43:30 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Yawn...

Kamala Harris is eligible.

Birthers invented a fictitious standard of eligibility that defined Natural Born Citizen to require a candidate’s parents to be citizens under the delusion that this would nullify Obama’s presidency. It is a standard found nowhere in the Constitution or in any court decision. It’s pure nonsense.

Kamala Harris will face no serious challenge to her eligibility should she decide to run.

5 posted on 01/10/2019 1:43:42 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3680574/posts


6 posted on 01/10/2019 1:43:57 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Article list a fella named Wilmot (?) who has sent Harris two letters, asking how she thinks she qualifies to run for president, when she is NOT a natural born citizen.

It is bound to come up, certainly other candidates would have standing.

The timid GOP and our SCOTUS would not question Obama.

In this case, she is clearly not meeting the requirements.


7 posted on 01/10/2019 1:44:10 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

No she is too stupid


8 posted on 01/10/2019 1:45:54 PM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of today be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

There are several article out there on this. This is the same article that I just posted.


9 posted on 01/10/2019 1:45:58 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

based on the stated facts of her parentage, she is definitely not eligible.

would the American public (and GOP-Excrement) let us get phuqued over Again, after 8 years of BO? I doubt it...after all that damage....but...some here on FR have said...yes


10 posted on 01/10/2019 1:46:30 PM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians arent born, they’re excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

The articles are clearly listed in the constitution. I just posted them.


11 posted on 01/10/2019 1:47:05 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

It is resolved, as far as the official legal and political system is concerned.

Only chance for a challenge would be for the relevant election official or board to refuse to put her on a primary ballot.

If she were to get the nomination, she would almost certainly not face serious challenge. It would be considered purely political question at that point, to be resolved by voters.


12 posted on 01/10/2019 1:48:37 PM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
The articles are clearly listed in the constitution. I just posted them.

No, you didn't. The "two citizen parent" requirement to be considered a NBC is found nowhere in the Constitution.

Believe me, I've been through this before.

13 posted on 01/10/2019 1:49:22 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

“would the American public (and GOP-Excrement) let us get phuqued over Again, after 8 years of BO? “


Who, exactly, do you think gave us BO in the first place? Of COURSE they’ll do it again...unless Trump gets this Wall up and enough people stay awake to the lies and the anti-Americanism of the Dems and their captive media.


14 posted on 01/10/2019 1:49:41 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

“It is a standard found nowhere in the Constitution or in any court decision.”

NBC is a term of art found in deVattels “Law of Nations”. The Framers had copies of deVattel’s work.


15 posted on 01/10/2019 1:50:36 PM PST by gasport (The dung beatle should be the symbol of the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

.. she’ll even cite the Kenyan as precedence that even martians can be president of the US of A.


16 posted on 01/10/2019 1:50:53 PM PST by himno hero (had'nff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

or saudi princes/ mugabes ...


17 posted on 01/10/2019 1:52:08 PM PST by himno hero (had'nff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“five years prior to Harris’s birth, a requirement to apply for naturalization”

Cite the law that specifies this.


18 posted on 01/10/2019 1:52:27 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

If she were to get the nomination, she would almost certainly not face serious challenge.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You think President Trump would roll over like McLame did?


19 posted on 01/10/2019 1:53:38 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Under our court system, if Stalin or Hitler were alive and living in California, they would be eligible.

And our press wouldn’t have a problem with Russian collusion if Stalin ran.


20 posted on 01/10/2019 1:54:17 PM PST by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson