Posted on 01/04/2019 6:27:34 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
The Nobel-winning biologist has drawn global criticism with unfounded pronouncements on genetics, race and intelligence. He still thinks hes right, a new documentary finds.
It has been more than a decade since James D. Watson, a founder of modern genetics, landed in a kind of professional exile by suggesting that black people are intrinsically less intelligent than whites.
In 2007, Dr. Watson, who shared a 1962 Nobel Prize for describing the double-helix structure of DNA, told a British journalist that he was inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa because all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all the testing says, not really.
Moreover, he added, although he wished everyone were equal, people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.
Dr. Watsons comments reverberated around the world, and he was forced to retire from his job as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, although he retains an office there.
He apologized publicly and unreservedly, and in later interviews he sometimes suggested that he had been playing the provocateur his trademark role or had not understood that his comments would be made public.
Ever since, Dr. Watson, 90, has been largely absent from the public eye. His speaking invitations evaporated. In 2014, he became the first living Nobelist to sell his medal, citing a depleted income from having been designated a nonperson.
But his remarks have lingered. They have been invoked to support white supremacist views, and scientists routinely excoriate Dr. Watson when his name surfaces on social media.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
This is why I, with a background in science, distrust peer review profoundly.
Please explain.
What is unclear?
First of all as a fellow Irishman, you are probably right...
Secondly, why is the NFL 70%ish black when they only constitute 15%ish of the population...
Why is the NFL #racist
When IQ tests were first developed and applied on a wide scale in the 1920s, it was found that newly arrived East European Jews and their children did poorly on the tests. This led to wide concern that genetics meant had left Jews were intellectually impaired. Yet within a generation, Harvard and the rest of the Ivy league imposed quotas limiting the admission of Jews. Now, similar quotas are covertly applied to limit the numbers of Chinese students and to protect the admission preference for the children of graduates and major donors. Whatever the influence of genetics on intelligence may be, surely IQ tests also measure something else that is even more important: the determination to excel in school.
And one of the more intelligent folks from that continent has a suggestion: Let Africa Sink
And for the Neo-Nazis and alt-Whities crowing over Mr. Watson's observations, they should remember that the average IQ of Asians is a little higher than that of White people.
As for how intrinsic the IQ difference may or may not be, we just need to remember that Africa is mostly run be deplorable people who are perfectly fine with keeping their citizens dumb, poorly fed and oppressed.
I guess leftists really dont believe in science.
I’ve had American black employees, Commonwealth black employees, and African born black employees. American blacks exhibit all the negative traits of the ‘hood.’ The other blacks do not. You could blame the Great Society for imbuing the entitlement mentality of American blacks, from which all else followed.
“I watched it. Scientists objecting to Watsons claims werent denying that blacks score lower on IQ tests. But they were saying that it happens for cultural and socioeconomic reasons, not for genetic reasons.”
Thanks.
Fact of the matter is neither has a basis to conclude either.
Intelligence is such a broad trait as to be meaningless for scientific analysis. Aspects of intelligence specifically defined can be. But that then brings up issues of characterizing and defining genetic populations. For example Watson’s anecdotal comment makes no sense in that American black genetics is quite different than African on the whole.
Intelligence and genetics really hasn’t been studied and no one knows the genetic basis for “intelligence”, nor even specifically deigned aspects such as ability to do certain math etc...
There’s so much more to this topic that is too much to discuss here. There’re the scientific questions and then the socio-political environment which makes even objectively discussing the topic a minefield.
That would be a good bet.
Biological gender is a binary thing, but I agree that sexuality is on a spectrum.
He outlived Rushton
“all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all the testing says, not really.
The weird thing is this could be turned around to be progressive. e.g. Saying trying to force our western culture and paradigms on a foreign culture is cultural imperialism and not appropriate for non western cultures.
e.g. Science is racist compared to folk beliefs.
https://reason.com/blog/2016/10/14/watch-leftist-students-say-science-is-ra
Id like to see proof that Jews did poorly on IQ tests in the early 20th century
Jews even in pales and other pseudo reservations did quite well and excelled in all manner of sciences and business
In Hungary and Poland and Austria and Germany and England and France
Im suspect of that proffer
I would note that Ashkhenazim Jews do indeed test well on IQ tests but Sephardic and Mizrahi and Oriental Jews dont test any higher than most caucazoidal means
Chinese IQ tests depend wholly on which Chinese youre testing same as testing white Americans or black Americans where large deviation exists
This area of so called science is so political that study after study exists to try to convince people to simply ignore what they experience their entire lives
Ultimately it feeds the holy grail of dismissing any and all white accomplishments and western civilization as a fluke or theft from non whites
Its just all bullshit
Anyone who has any empirical logic left can easily tell who prospers and reasons and who lags and is prone to emotive physicality in the place of thought out response
Smart people did not bludgeon and chop up 1,000,000 Tutsi
Ive spent a third of my life in the developing world....even do gooders in NGO capacity get confronted with realities that shatter their Pollyanna beliefs about race and intelligence
Having worked for over 3 years as a C.O. in a county jail my observations lead me to the dsame conclusion as Dr Watson.
where was this picture taken? US? College?
where was this picture taken? US? College?
In my opinion this sort of thing is why I believe there will be a white genocide worldwide within 15 years
Is this a microagression?
Sowell talks about Cultural Capital as being foundational to intelligence and success.
However there are dull children as well as bright ones even in the early years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.