End it. Now.
Democrats and the Deep State are panicked. Good.
And what is Chuck-U going to do about it? He will still be in the minority in 2919.
Democrats: No AG with opinions on the law shall be allowed!
If an AG with an opinion must recuse for their opinions, so should any ‘jurists’ in an impeachment vote.
This is awesome. LOL.
So now the Democrats are concerned about about law enforcement being biased? The bias of the DOJ is how this mess was created!!
Derail the probe? What probe? It’s over! There’s no collusion, no nothing. Bag it.
Just like it's ALWAYS been, right Chuck!??? moron
It’s a nothing-burger, Rooters.
As it should. The “investigation” is a travesty and a slap in the face of the slogan on the Supreme Court building.
Witch Hunts, Witch Hunts,
merry messy Witch Hunts,
Witch Hunts, Witch Hunts,
For partisan purposes,
Yeah!
The Left needed a Witch Hunt,
Flew some trial balloons,
Didn’t mind the lies to start it up!
Witch Hunts, Witch Hunts,
merry messy Witch Hunts,
Witch Hunts, Witch Hunts,
For partisan purposes,
Yeah!
Rolled over RINOs,
Never by their side,
Got to get along,
Even if it kills us,
Yeah!
Having opinions and engaging with the Russians is two different things.
Scumee is such a doofus.
UpChuck is a pre-Op Pelosi & Nancy is a pre-Op Chuckie.
And they both self -identify as ‘representatives of the people’!
That is more than enough proof of their ‘psychological’ disorders for me...
Raises alarms? Hopes too
How many Republicans raised the alarm about Rosenstein and Mueller when they became responsible for the witch hunt — None. Just look at how different the Dems respond vs how the weak Repubs responded.
Job description for Attorney General:
Virgin
Prior 25 years spent in a SCIF room
No prior use of Facebook or other social medial
Gold level donor supporting NPR
Annual pass on AMTRAK and the Metro
Wears Nike swoosh gear
The president must immediately reconsider and find another nominee who is free of conflicts and will carry out the duties of the office impartially,” Schumer said.
Of course Schumer is right. How could Whitaker objectively investigate Russian collusion after he personally facilitated the transport of American Uranium to Russian buyers?
In fact, he might even a suspect himself and would certainly derail any meaningful investigation. Would probably destroy evidence, engage in obstruction of justice, and commit all manner of crimes.
(Actual name of the person who did this was not used here to protect the guilty.)