Skip to comments.
WALL FUNDING OFF TABLE
Drudge ^
Posted on 12/18/2018 7:55:18 AM PST by navysealdad
No wall funding
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 115th; artofthedeal; border; buildthewall; fakenews; federalspending; genderdysphoria; homosexualagenda; lodi90; mexicowillpay; nevertrump; nevertrumper; nevertrumpers; nevertrumpertrolls; noitsnotyouidiots; onthetable; readpost14; stupidclickbait; tangledupinblue; trump; trumpbudget; trusttheplan; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-260 next last
To: DarthVader
Has it occurred to you that Drudge did not make the decision to not pursue a government shutdown?
21
posted on
12/18/2018 8:01:20 AM PST
by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: All
Not sure why some think this is a bad headline. I think it’s wonderful, but I also think having Pelosi as Speaker is a net plus for DJT. Ryan was poisonous to MAGA.
To: mewzilla
Yep:
See previous post...................
23
posted on
12/18/2018 8:01:27 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: TangledUpInBlue
So I guess you are happy then. Why not celebrate?
24
posted on
12/18/2018 8:02:07 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: bigbob
Yes I know but Drudge needs to be banned from Free Republic for other reasons.
25
posted on
12/18/2018 8:02:32 AM PST
by
DarthVader
(Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of today be decided but by Blood & Iron)
To: laplata
Trump will be considered successful if he gets the wall funding from the defense budget.
26
posted on
12/18/2018 8:02:35 AM PST
by
Rapscallion
(Iran's leaders are as crazy as bedbugs.)
To: navysealdad
Democrats are digging in, not just because of they love illegal votes, but also they know the lack of a wall will be Trump’s “No new taxes” moment.
27
posted on
12/18/2018 8:03:22 AM PST
by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: navysealdad
28
posted on
12/18/2018 8:03:28 AM PST
by
chris37
To: Red Badger
To: BinaryBoy
That’s about to be exactly what it is.
He will be a one termer at best without a wall.
30
posted on
12/18/2018 8:04:32 AM PST
by
chris37
To: navysealdad
Actually, a WaPo article. Drudge just makes it sound even more anti-Trump.
31
posted on
12/18/2018 8:04:57 AM PST
by
moovova
To: ealgeone
Look at that headline—it’s not the headline to the actual story, but one made up by Drudge.
And it makes it look like Trump backed down while Congress didn’t.
The real story is that Trump is going to bypass Congress to build the wall—but you would have no idea of that from Drudge.
The WP headline is much more fair and accurate. Let that sink in.
To: Rapscallion
I no longer trust the DOD. Look at Mattis. What a damn disappointment he is.
33
posted on
12/18/2018 8:05:08 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: central_va
My happiness or lack thereof isn’t an issue. My disbelief that it would ever happen was and remains correct. This was a BS promise.
As ludicrous as making Mexico pay for it. I’ll eat crow if it happens. But it’s never going to happen.
To: TangledUpInBlue
17............................
35
posted on
12/18/2018 8:05:21 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: BinaryBoy
Democrats are digging in, not just because of they love illegal votes, but also they know the lack of a wall will be Trump’s “No new taxes” moment.
Democrats? The GOP hates POTUS every bit as much as the Dems do. He’s the first POTUS in American history without the support of his own party.
36
posted on
12/18/2018 8:05:22 AM PST
by
lodi90
To: Red Badger
The WaPo was much more accurate here, including with its headline.
Drudge’s made-up headline completely distorts the story and the actual news from it.
To: Red Badger
Sanders said the White House was exploring other funding sources and believed it could be legally done. “There are certainly a number of different funding sources that we’ve identified that we can use, that we can couple with money that would be given through congressional appropriations that would help us get to that $5 billion that the president needs in order to protect our border,” she said.I'll believe it when I see it.
To: Red Badger
Ok, fair enough. If you believe them. I don’t.
To: TangledUpInBlue
So answer the question: are you happy about this?
40
posted on
12/18/2018 8:06:46 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-260 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson