Posted on 12/06/2018 12:23:20 PM PST by Kaslin
My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”
It’s a fair question.
Swalwell is the MSNBC stalwart who recently wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns that make people like him wet themselves and imprison those of us who decline to surrender them. Millions of Americans own these basic tools of freedom, which the ignorant call “assault weapons,” and these loyal citizens keep and bear them to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their Constitution. But Rep. Swalwell would make these citizens felons, though these patriots are only a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants.
Of course, he wants to make these patriots felons because they are a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. After all, that’s what leftist Democrats like him are.
Now, we know that some Americans would resist this kind of tyranny. People all over the world are resisting the elite’s commands. The Brits Brexited. The French are rioting because they don’t want to sacrifice their livelihoods on behalf of the global elites’ weird weather religion. And a decree that the Second Amendment is not a thing anymore would certainly provoke some serious pushback here.
That’s why it’s fair to ask Rep. Bloodlust how much blood he’s prepared to shed to achieve his goal of disarming Normal Americans.
Rep. Swalwell, some people are going to fight rather than cave in, so what’s the number of bodies you would be willing to pile up to win? Let’s put aside the right or wrong of resistance; it’ll be a thing. It’ll happen. You’re from near San Francisco, so you don’t know any real Americans, but even though I am from that hellhole too, I’ve met a few Americans in my travels. They are an ornery people who don’t give in to the kind of bullying you advocate. So, you’re going to have to kill some people to do what you want, and I just want to know how many you’re prepared to off to achieve your goal.
After all, it’s not as if you Democrats don’t already have a history of killing people for having guns you disapprove of.
Remember Waco? The raid on David Koresh’s compound was because his weird band of misfits allegedly had scary, outlawed guns. That’s why Democrat Janet Reno initially decided to send in the troops. The government got four of our ATF agents killed, then slaughtered the resisters, including women and kids.
Was it worth it? Maybe these creepy cultists were violating the law, but was making sure they didn’t have guns that were scary worth shooting or burning alive about 80 people, including four cops?
Was it?
So, in light of his party’s track record, I want to know how many people Rep. Swalwell – who fancies himself a potent Democrat presidential contender – is prepared to see die so he can ensure Americans are disarmed in order to please the liberal Californians he represents. How many?
One?
One hundred?
One thousand?
One hundred thousand?
More?
How many corpses would Eric Swalwell and his blue state buddies accept because they don’t think some law-abiding citizen in Oklahoma should be allowed to choose what kind of weapon he has, because they think they should choose for him, and that that choice should be “None?”
On Twitter, which is a wonderful thing because it makes people truly reveal themselves, one gentleman pointed out the not-so-far-fetched notion that mass gun confiscation (let’s leave the problematic logistics for the gun-hating fascists aside) would spark a civil war. But Rep. Swalwell was not worried; he observed that a bunch of citizens with rifles could not stand up to a military armed with nuclear weapons.
Well, that’s a troubling notion.
Now, Congressman Strangelove properly took a lot of grief for suggesting nuking fellow Americans, but even if you accept his backtracking about how this was a joke – nothing’s funnier than suggesting the mass murder of fellow Americans! – he only put nukes off limits. What killing systems are still on the table? Infantry? Artillery? Bombers? Because his answer assumed that he would support prosecuting a war against those who failed to obey and submit to arrest.
So, Congressman, what means of destructions are still on the table to use against fellow Americans who refuse to allow you to strip them of their Second Amendment rights because you Bay Area liberals want to show those hicks in Jesusland who’s boss? Is shooting them okay? Shelling them? Bombing them, just not with nukes?
Having seen the fruits of oppression overseas, I find this troubling. Actually, that’s putting it lightly. I find it horrifying. I’ve written about it in my novels about how our country could be ripped apart by leftist oppression. My just-released book Wildfire paints a most unpretty picture, but my predictions keep coming true. Try as I might, nothing I write speculating about what they would do if given the chance seems to hold a candle to what people like Congressman Stalin tell us they are actually willing to do to crush us under their Gucci loafers.
Understand that the leftists with Swalwell’s mentality are not driven by notions of justice or reason, but by cold hatred for Normal Americans. We’ve been disobedient. We’ve been defiant. We’ve refused to surrender our means of defending our own sovereignty to our elite overlords, and that is intolerable.
After all, a man without a rifle is not a citizen. He’s a serf, subject to the whims and will of his overlords who you damn well know are never giving up the guns their minions keep and bear.
Look at England. They gave up their guns. Now, the police watch their Twitter feeds and arrest them if they say unapproved things. That’s not a bug to our liberal elite; that’s a feature. That’s the goal.
Wait, this is crazy talk! If we disarm and only a government controlled by the liberal elite has guns, our overlords will be totally cool. They’ll respect our right to say and do what we want. They’ll allow us to practice our religion as we please. You know, just like liberals respect the rights of normal people where they are in control, like on college campuses, or on social media, or in the municipalities that hassle Christian cake shops.
Get woke. They hate you, and your freedom to tell them to pound sand sticks in their collective collectivist craw. Ignore the leftist media and the Fredocon collaborators who demand you not believe your lying eyes or ears when they tell you what they intend to do to you if given the chance.
So, the question remains. Our liberal elite betters think we should be stripped of those scary bangsticks the Constitution protects, and we disagree. So, Rep. Swalwell, how many Americans are you willing to kill to fulfill your vision of a disarmed, defenseless, servile population of docile subjects?
One?
One hundred?
One thousand?
One hundred thousand?
More?
My third novel about America after it splits into two countries, one red and one blue, just dropped. Check out Wildfire and see what could happen if we fail to defend our freedom in the face of people who want to make us Venezuela del Norte.
The day they start going door to door to either collect or arrest gun owners is the day Cwii starts. Pick anyone with an 0bama sticker.
It might have been me. Back in the lead-up to the year 2000 there were many on here who were convinced that Clinton would use the Y2K crisis as a subterfuge to suspend the Constitution and impose martial law. I was of the opinion that wasn't going to happen for one simple reason: somebody as politically calculating as Clinton would have to realize he would not get away with it.
After some reflection on my own words, it occurred to me that was the only really limit on the left's behavior: whether or not the believe they can get away with something without being held to account. I've mentioned that many times over the years in varying contexts. They rule of law, standards of professional ethics, personal morality are to the left meaningless and set no bounds on their behavior. They will always do whatever the believe they can get away with.
Bingo! You win the prize!
This sums up the left in a minimum of words.
whose
Leftists fully intend to impoverish us, enslave us, and kill us. They have the examples of the National Socialist Third Reich, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the Peoples' Republic of China to inspire them. They're quite serious.
Plan accordingly.
I'm afraid there'd be a great deal of "fuss", considering there are 150 million gun owners possessing 400 million guns.
Even if only one in ten refused to comply with a general confiscation order, that would be an army 15 million strong. That's ten times the number of federal troops under arms.
Don't think that the feds haven't wargamed this scenario out, many times in the past. I'll guarantee you that every time they have, they've lost in the end.
“Don’t nuke me, Bro!”
This site needs a LIKE button!
How many civilians own guns? About 150 million.
How many federal troops and LEOs are under arms? About 1.5 million.
Case closed.
In the mid 1700s, even before we were an established sovereign nation, and when the odds of success against the British Empire were vanishingly small, a full third of the American colonists supported the Revolution, and 3% actually shouldered rifles and fired upon the enemy.
That percentage would be far greater today, now that we are are a well established people, with a history stretching back two and a half centuries.
I POSTED THIS THE OTHER DAY. WE NEED TO BE MORE CONCERNED WITH i slum it’s THAN AMERICAN politicians.
/////////////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Last Call
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3710751/posts
12/5/2018, 1:33:13 PM · 5 of 6
mabarker1 to Presbyterian Reporter; Chode; Squantos; snooter55; SkyDancer; OldMissileer; Lockbox; ...
Why would an American tourist want to go to Western Europe these days?
If you want to enjoy Muslim culture it is far cheaper to spend a month in Libya than London or Paris or Rome.
In a few years One will be able to do that here in America.
The “i slum its” have used Our Constitutionally protected Freedom of Religion to sneak what is “claimed” to be a religious platform but is REALLY A MURDERIOUS MILITARY CULT TO BE STAGE 1 OF FORCED CONVERSION !!!
NOW STAGE 2 IS JUST STARTING TO HAPPEN WITH THE TAKE OVER AND DESTRUCTION OF OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
THE RULES ARE BEING CHANGED TO ALLOW THE MURDERIOUS MILITARY CULT TO HAVE THEIR CRAP FORCED ON THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
MARK MY WORDS, NEXT WILL BE THE SENATE.
AFTER THAT WILL BE THE JUDICIARY.
THEN THE PRISON SYSTEM WILL BECOME BEHEADING CENTERS.
AND FOLLOWING WILL BE THE ABOLISHMENT OF ANY OTHER RELIGIONS.
ANYONE NOT DEAD WILL HAVE TO CONVERT TO THE CULT.
AND FINALLY THE WHITE HOUSE.
Anybody care to place a bet the Japanese Society will be after US ?
Our Generation needs to somehow light a fire underneath the younger generations. If We fail America is toast. It will be a hard job to complete due to the political core-wrecked crap that will be slammed back at US. I somewhat fear that it will become CWII.
The “i slum its” have a plan and it works because People are lazy, ignorant and/or stupid !!!
CRUNCHING THE NUMBERS
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
a lot
Obviously, that never happened. ........... YET!!
I think we’re at a time where there could be one of those powder keg moments to set things off. My issue/question is, who’s fighting who?
Their side has no idea what could potentially come at them. And unless Swalwell and his puppet masters have some secret army like, Hydra, they’re going to learn real quick that it isn’t going to be easy.
Interesting information about Titor. Never heard of him.
Wondering if Titor based his predictions on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2y19-mirMGs
And I think, although somewhat a piece of fiction, could very well happen, in some form or another.
ANSWER: As much as it takes.
That question is only relevant if we actually engage in “the battle” to decide the issue.....not to mention that it would also entail someone controlling the military and whoever ends up with those reins will win...right or left.
The Left has plans that cannot be implemented while their victims can still shoot back.
So the answer is “All of it.”
Really?
The cops in Seattle are working in support of AntiFa ‘cuz the Commie Mayor told them to.
If it is a choice between their paycheck and killing a few gun owners to kick the others into line, we’re the ones who might be surprised.
That might change if their budgets were made dependent upon compliance. Or if individual officers were offered a bounty (bonus) for each gun confiscated.
Yes they do know but they also follow orders as well, same thing happened in Germany...as after the war in Europe the common phrase was from the German police, judges, Army when being questioned by the Allies “We were just following orders”....the SS was another matter...
Millions, if need be. Ayers said 25 mm back in the 70s. That was 1/6 of the population.
I think that was what was on Breitbart’s tape, complete with 0bama’s input and agreement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.