Posted on 10/30/2018 6:24:52 PM PDT by FrankLea
A federal judge speaks out about some shocking truths in regards to the State Department, FBI, Benghazi, and Hillary Clinton.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth has accused the State Department officials of telling lies and signing false affidavits in hopes to derail lawsuits that sought information about Hillary Clinton's private email server and how she handled the Benghazi terror attack in 2012.
This took place during a hearing in Washington, D.C.
The judge said he was "shocked" to learn that Clinton's former chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, had been granted immunity by the FBI during their investigation of Clinton's private email server.
(Excerpt) Read more at trendingviews.co ...
And what will their punishment be for such serious transgressions??
Must sit in the comfy chair...
The Damn courts KNOW the lawyers LIE, and do nothing.
They will soon be hated by the People as much as the
stinking, self-serving, foreign-run Congress.
I like my new socks.
...and of 535 members in congress less than a couple dozen give a damn!
The swamp is deep
The judge said he was “shocked”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not as shocked as I was that not ONE of our elected or appointed would stand for the Constitution and stop the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Barack Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.
Benghazi is serious stuff for Hillary and Obama.
Remember how they both went into hiding for awhile after Benghazi was basically over?
They thought they were had.
I don't know, a two million dollar a month retirement check maybe?
From reading the linked story citing quotes from the judge, who impugned the honesty of immunized witnesses, I’m left to wonder why the immunity still holds if the witness intentionally lied.
What is the source for this info and the quotes?
Me too. Or if the immunity was in furtherance of a cover up.
Bump for reference. I hope someone holds a meeting at State and starts firing people left and right and barring them from future federal employment.
RE: What is the source for this info and the quotes?
@#@
- - - Probably this Fox News report...
State Department provided ‘clearly false’ statements to derail requests for Clinton docs, ‘shocked’ federal judge says
Did the judge refer this false testimony - a federal crime - to the DOJ? If so, we only have dopey sessions to blame. If not, then the judge is a whining 'tard.
Benghazi ping.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
Thank you, FRiend.
BUMP!
Thanks for that info.
Another way of saying this is that ‘Frank,’ the article’s author, took a half-month old Fox News (Oct 17) article and rehashed it for his blog. Not very honest. And not very news worth.
FWIW, that Fox News story was posted here on FR by blam:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3697637/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.