Nate keeps UPPING the chance of a Dem house. With a plausible scenario of Dems +40 to +50 House seats.
Also, he has McCaskill favored in Missouri, Donnelly a 2-1 favorite, Kyrsten Sinema a strong favorite, Menendez a bigger favorite than Kevin Cramer in North Dakota who has been up double digits.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: St. Louis Conservative
To: St. Louis Conservative
3 posted on
10/29/2018 3:18:01 PM PDT by
Boogieman
To: St. Louis Conservative
Yo Nate...2016 ya had Hilda at 71.4%
4 posted on
10/29/2018 3:18:14 PM PDT by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73....8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: St. Louis Conservative
Why not one hundred percent, Nat?
5 posted on
10/29/2018 3:18:57 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
To: St. Louis Conservative
[he has.....Kyrsten Sinema a strong favorite]
Oh my......
Guess he keeps trying to make things go his way. Or the way of his masters.
6 posted on
10/29/2018 3:20:05 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: St. Louis Conservative
7 posted on
10/29/2018 3:21:50 PM PDT by
ohiobushman
(Donald J. Trump for POTUS 2020)
To: St. Louis Conservative
does not equal 100% he has stated. Too many see a number and read 100%
8 posted on
10/29/2018 3:22:07 PM PDT by
SMGFan
( .)
To: St. Louis Conservative
Is Nate Silver doing polling for The Onion now? Just sayin.
10 posted on
10/29/2018 3:23:49 PM PDT by
fatman6502002
((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
To: St. Louis Conservative
It seems to me that John Hanoi Kerry was favored to win and the media made up some numbers that they said he was ahead which caused about 35,000 GOP voters to stay home. The demonicRATS are desperate.
11 posted on
10/29/2018 3:24:25 PM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: St. Louis Conservative
and if they do they’ll tear it down
To: St. Louis Conservative
Remember Election night 2016.
Remember how “Trump will NEVER be President...”
Oh, wait...
To: St. Louis Conservative
Is Nate Silver taking bets?
16 posted on
10/29/2018 3:32:15 PM PDT by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: St. Louis Conservative
Yet....almost every contested US Senate seat is moving toward the GOP?
To: St. Louis Conservative
Nate’s methodology requires accurate polls.
To: St. Louis Conservative
I honestly do not understand how this will happen when turnout already has been reported higher on the R side.
21 posted on
10/29/2018 3:41:20 PM PDT by
cld51860
(Volo pro veritas)
To: St. Louis Conservative
He’s deliberately trying to create the same cognitive dissonance reaction that resulted in the #Resitance anti-Trumper tantrum following the 2016 election results.
22 posted on
10/29/2018 3:45:15 PM PDT by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: St. Louis Conservative
23 posted on
10/29/2018 3:46:00 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: St. Louis Conservative
To: St. Louis Conservative
bet against him at predictit and make some $$$ if you think he’s wrong.
To: St. Louis Conservative
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
