Posted on 10/24/2018 1:47:19 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
U.S. Democratic leaders in Congress said on Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s call for unity after suspicious packages were sent to leading Democratic figures “ring hollow” because of his past statements that condone acts of violence.
“Time and time again, the president has condoned physical violence and divided Americans with his words and his actions,” Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and House of Representatives top Democrat Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.
They cited the Republican president’s “support for the congressman who body-slammed a reporter, the neo-Nazis who killed a young woman in Charlottesville, his supporters at rallies who get violent with protesters, dictators around the world who murder their own citizens.”
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
“Did any “reporter” ask them how the F they can say irresponsible stuff like this within hours, when they know absolutely zero facts?”
Schumer and Pelosi would love to throw conservatives and patriots into gulags for immediate execution. What’s stopping them are millions of gun owners.
SPECIFICS! SPECIFICS! SPECIFICS! They say the president has advocated violence over and over and over - yet, they have to go back to discredited stories from 2 years ago to cite any evidence. Now Trump supporters are attacking the demon demonstrators? WOW! Show us the evidence!!! They ought to love that creep in Portland who used the foul language on the woman whose husband was killed on 9/11/01.. I see that disgusting excuse for a human being lost his job!
Do these two sleep together, do you think?
You want to ring hollow ? Just tap the back of either schumer or Pelosi’s heads. /S
I was being sarcastic. Of course they coordinated their talking points ahead of time.
They're Democrats.
I see two possible explanations:
1. A far right wing extremist decided to try and bomb a bunch of left wing democrats two weeks before the national election, totally oblivious to the fact that the only possible effect it would have would be to fire up democrat voters who would have otherwise stayed home, and by pure luck none of the bombs went off.
2. A far left wing extremist decided to pretend to bomb a bunch of left wing democrats two weeks before the national election in a desperate attempt to fire up democrat voters who would have otherwise stayed home.
Which of the two do you think is more likely?
Maybe they were too busy getting bombs ready for the others.
Because KAVANAUGH!
I did not follow these two clowns comments today...
Was Nancy able to finish a complete sentence and was it understandable? she is so scrambled in her words and thoughts, nothing she says makes any sense...
She and Charlie both get on my last nerve so I have been avoiding them...they are NUTS...
#2 because of the word “pretend”. These packages were not “bombs”.
ping
Well said, Skywise!
Well said! [in post 9]
Here’s another post I appreciate:
Syncro: “When it gets going well enough for the deep state/shadow gov to believe they can be able to successfully blame it on right wing Constitutionalists they will do that.”
That is the dirty little secret in this ‘Bomb Caper’.
All along they planned this to be their end game — to alienate and lock up conservatives for ultimate evils. But Trump’s success has forced them to attempt this ahead of schedule. What was intended to be a death blow is now on the verge of being just another mosquito in the bug zapper.
Even so, it gives them something to bray about. It will fire up the radical left with added energy. They make me think of a fenced in dog — alone and bored and feeling unloved, it wants any excuse to bark.
Isaiah 59 comes to mind especially verse 13...
59:13 In transgressing and lying against the LORD, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.