Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murkowski to vote "present" as a courtesy to Montana senator
Axios ^ | Oct 5, 2018 | Marisa Fernandez

Posted on 10/05/2018 6:27:37 PM PDT by 11th_VA

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) will vote "present" as a courtesy to Montana Sen. Steve Daines as he plans to walk his daughter down the aisle at her wedding, which collides with the timing of the Senate floor vote for Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation.

The big picture: Her vote will not change the outcome of Kavanaugh's confirmation as Sen. Daines was expected to vote in favor of Trump's pick. Though Murkowski announced earlier that she opposes Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court, she says she hopes her "present" vote "reminds us we can take very small steps to be gracious."

(Excerpt) Read more at axios.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: 115th; alaska; daines; kavanaugh; lisamurkowski; montana; murkowski; rollcall; stevedaines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

The common practice called “pairing” is when any of one party cannot make a vote because of a life or death important level event in their life, ONE MEMBER OF THE OTHER PARTY is volunteered to vote present.

THE OTHER PARTY... of which she is not.


21 posted on 10/05/2018 6:45:53 PM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

her job is not to be “gracious” but to vote as her constituents want.


22 posted on 10/05/2018 6:46:35 PM PDT by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

How soon can Daines be voted out?


23 posted on 10/05/2018 6:48:38 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

I agree...in a heartbeat they’ll fly him in if needed! Senator go and enjoy your daughter’s wedding! BUT YOU BETTER BE ON STANDBY OR else ALL HELL WILL BREAK loose ON YOUR BUTT!!!


24 posted on 10/05/2018 6:49:58 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
IIRC from my early days serving in 501(c)(3 & 4) organizations in my capacity several years ago as a Secretary in one and a Treasurer in another voting present (about 30 years ago) this only means that one is actually present for the official vote but will not be casting a vote one way of the other kind of like abstaining I believe. Not for or against. The 50% +1 final vote count still does not change in any way. This would likely stop a 50%-50% (possibly a 49-49 in this case) tie in which the President of the Senate VP Pence would therefore cast the tie breaking and deciding vote. Or something similar to this scenario I believe.

But I don't think it's going to be that close anyway. I'm suspecting the vote to be about 47 against and 53 for or there about. Variance depending on the present vote on the "D's" part and the absent vote on the "R's" part.

25 posted on 10/05/2018 6:53:05 PM PDT by Ron H. (Pray unceasingly - 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

What a stupid < insert favorite pejorative for female reproductive organs here >


26 posted on 10/05/2018 6:53:37 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Sara Palin should challenger her to a topless mud wrestling duel.


27 posted on 10/05/2018 6:54:41 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

If any one of the pledged votes flip by tomorrow, Kavanaugh loses if Daines isn’t there. If he’s there and this happens, Pence can break the tie. I don’t know why Mitch wouldn’t drag his ass there considering Murk flipped her vote on the way to the freaking chamber today.


28 posted on 10/05/2018 6:55:07 PM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Chill on Daines. He would be in DC if needed.

If for some reason, Murkowski goes squirelly, or Manchin flips back, then Mitch just holds the vote open, and Daines has a private plane ready to fly him back to vote. She is trying to lessen the impact of her traitorous vote. She needs to go. And Mitch needs to strip her of all her power.


29 posted on 10/05/2018 6:55:39 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

Think of the carbon footprint.


30 posted on 10/05/2018 6:56:20 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Behind the Blue Wall

It means that Daines does not have to miss his daughter’s wedding since her vote will not change the tally.


31 posted on 10/05/2018 6:57:41 PM PDT by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GAGOP
This is actually a shrewed move on her part. It allows her to honestly say she did not vote against Kavanaugh but not have to say she voted for him. ......

That's exactly what it is, a face saving hedge your bet ploy living to fight another day. She knows full well that the "D's" lost the vote so she may as well try and salvage a little credibility in the eyes of her constituents since she may be facing a foreboding challenger in her next reelection bid in 2022(?) with famed Sarah Palin whispering a potential run against her..

32 posted on 10/05/2018 6:58:12 PM PDT by Ron H. (Pray unceasingly - 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
It means that Daines does not have to miss his daughter’s wedding since her vote will not change the tally.

Is there the possibility for a double cross here? For example, if Manchin changes his mind at the last instant if Daines isn't around? He'll be under a lot of pressure to do exactly that.

33 posted on 10/05/2018 6:59:37 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Daines should realize that voting Yes for a Supreme Court Justice , when the votes for and against are so close, is his elected job! Surely the wedding could be worked around somehow. If I were his daughter I would insist that daddy stay and vote, and then catch a flight asap.


34 posted on 10/05/2018 7:00:40 PM PDT by TheConservativeParty ( Trump is The Storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I think it’s insane if this guy is not there to vote.


35 posted on 10/05/2018 7:01:07 PM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

Thanks for pointing this out to all the people calling for Daines head on a pike.

Daines said he would be there if needed. This was all worked out with McConnell last night.


36 posted on 10/05/2018 7:02:11 PM PDT by hirn_man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

I defer to your explanation. I was in the ball park with mine but yours is more concise. Thanks for jogging my memory.


37 posted on 10/05/2018 7:02:15 PM PDT by Ron H. (Pray unceasingly - 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

Dems and Murkowski still plotting. I wouldn’t take her word or Manchin’s on promises to vote.


38 posted on 10/05/2018 7:06:13 PM PDT by damper99 (pu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GAGOP

“It allows her to honestly say she did not vote against Kavanaugh but not have to say she voted for him. “

And that wouldn’t be possible without Daine’s absence.... which is so perplexing- maybe it was all planned?
(Also, this assures a vote as I’ve explained elsewhere ad nauseum)


39 posted on 10/05/2018 7:07:01 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech
THE OTHER PARTY... of which she is not.

Are you certain she isn't?

40 posted on 10/05/2018 7:07:34 PM PDT by null and void (The big problem is that the republicans don't keep their campaign promises and the democrats do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson