Posted on 10/04/2018 12:34:21 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Sen. Dianne Feinstein stood next to Chuck Schumer as she gave an interesting statement in which she contradicted herself within a few moments of speaking.
Her and Schumer walked into the room, stated they were not taking any questions.
Feinstein stated that she reviewed the report in a very limited time.
She said that she had to leave.
She said she had the opportunity to read some of the report, but did not read the entire report.
She claims that the FBI report looks to be an incomplete document, but she also said that she left and did not read the full report, which contradicts itself.
Feinstein continued to criticize the way that the White House and FBI handled the report and investigation, then criticizes the hearing and the amount of time (5 minutes) that they were given to question Kavanaugh last week during his hearing
Watch Dianne Feinstein's contradicting statement in this video.
"It looks to be the product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White House," Feinstein, ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said after reading the FBI report into allegations that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman decades ago
Feinstein will likely face harsh criticism after this video goes viral.
Republicans will criticize her for claiming that the FBI report/investigation looked to be incomplete, but focus on her admission that she "had to leave" and did not read the entire report.
Critics will also ask her why she had to leave. The FBI's report on Kavanaugh/Ford is the moment Democrats have been waiting for. With the exception of a family emergency or having a bad case of the runs, there’s not much reason for Feinstein to have to leave the only opportunity she will have to read the report about the man that Democrats wanted to be investigated.
Having to leave, without it being a suitable reason, simply won't be respected or tolerated from those who criticize Feinstein for her statement.
So old she couldn’t make out the words anymore, particularly the “big ones”. I believe the Dems burned her on this.
An attack on the FBI is an attack on the Constitution...
If they’re investigating Trump and Trump complains.
fineswine you IGNORANT COMMIERATSCUMBAG UGLY LYING WITCH!!!!!!
you SHOULD BE IN JAIL OR HUNG BY THE NECK TILL ... THE BATS FLY OUT OF your A$$.!!!!
I better stop before I get a knock on the door.
Was she in there just long enough to do a Sandy Pants?
“....Time for her to be put in a Retirement Home.....”
Time for her to be put in a federal prison.
Well, staff weren't allowed into the room to read the report to her.
Don't worry, come January, she won't. She is going to lose to a La Raza communist who is going to make her look reasonable and trustworthy. The only good news is DeLeon will not have any seniority.
She could be the emperor’s wife from Star Wars.
How is she still a senator at 85?
They are allowed an hour. Is she a slow reader or did she already know she LOST.
Like that old joke:
“This restaurant serves horrible food,
and such small portions too!”
Why would Feinstein bother to read it? There can be nothing in it that could possibly make her rethink her vote.
Fineswine is blind in one eye. I doubt if she could read more than half of the report.
Maybe she had to visit the Powder Room to take care of
‘whatever’.
She needs to be INVESTIGATED! NOW!
I Have A Dream-—— Assault weapon bans across the country are deemed unconstitutional. And DIFI lives long enough to see her dream die.
She ain’t to lady.
“...her admission that she “had to leave” and did not read the entire report...”
Hag didn’t even read the Executive Summary.
She didn’t read Obamacare, either. Seems to be a habit of hers.
Wish there was some way to bring her up on Ethics charges.
All I can see is this is the demise of the democrat party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.