Posted on 09/29/2018 5:20:55 AM PDT by reaganaut1
...
there are obvious questions and avenues of inquiry, unpursued by both parties, that could bring us closer to understanding which of the two witnesses were telling the real truth.
Start with the issues with Blasey’s account. She gave us a story of a teenage house party in which she remembered five of at least six attendees, in which she left in a stumbling terrified hurry, in which she, then 15, didn’t drive herself there or back but isn’t sure who did.
It is the chief weakness in the entire story that the close friend who supposedly attended with her, Leland Keyser, not only doesn’t remember the party but says she doesn’t remember Kavanaugh himself as well. But even if we stipulate that this friend has nothing more to offer — even though all we have from Keyser so far is a terse statement, and Blasey’s somewhat evasive suggestion today that she’s compromised by health problems — then what about the members of Blasey’s family, the parents and siblings with whom she was living at the time? They have been strikingly silent since she came forward, with her father offering only a perfunctory statement of support. Shouldn’t they have some memories of parties their 15 year old attended, some memory of when they drove her places and when other people brought her home — and perhaps even some memory of a night when their daughter returned early and distraught?
Maybe not — but it would be very interesting to hear from them. It would also be interesting to pursue the likelihood that this small party, which took place somewhere within a relatively limited geographic area, was probably held at the house of one of the small group of people whom Blasey remembers attending.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Release the congressional sex case names. $17,000,000 was paid to silence the victims.
There was an allegation against Chuck Schumer last December.
Sen. Chuck Schumer addresses fake sexual misconduct claim against him (2017)
NBC.com ^ | Dec.13.2017 | NBC
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3691662/posts
Sen. Chuck Schumer addresses fake sexual misconduct claim against him
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pursuing legal action against a phony claim that alleges he is responsible for sexual misconduct toward a former aide.
Russ Doubthat, moron , dangerous liberal scum.
>>there are obvious questions and avenues of inquiry, unpursued by both parties, that could bring us closer to understanding which of the two witnesses were telling the real truth.
- Can’t fly
- This incident came out in therapy while having their home remodeled
- Didn’t know they were willing to go to her to get a statement a week earlier
All of the congressional sex case names and information should be released. At least this has some support and is not 35 years old. Also, these were adults involved.
The issue is never the issue
The truth will not save us.
Blasey-Ford is a CIA cutout, let’s start from there.
They seem to be almost demanding a Special Prosecutor be named to investigate an alleged High School groping incident from 36 years ago.
My personal feeling is that Kavanaugh is 100% innocent. And if he isn’t? So what? I mean: really. It’s High School. It was a quick grope. That’s all they have in their best case scenario. And they think it’s a big deal? It’s not.
Given everything that's transpired over the last few weeks I am *very* strongly inclined to believe that it's Judge Kavinaugh's testimony that is both truthful and accurate.
I can't help but think that if God was truly just, these scum would burst into flame at the very mention of the word.
“The issue is never the issue.”
Let’s make the issue an issue.
In a game of ‘Chicken’ you might consider speeding up, removing the steering wheel, and throwing it out the window.
Let’s investigate Clinton’s judicial appointees. It is a CERTAINTY that some of them committed sexual crimes as minors.
Why Clinton?
More coming up.
"...what about the members of Blasey’s family, the parents and siblings with whom she was living at the time? They have been strikingly silent since she came forward, with her father offering only a perfunctory statement of support. Shouldn’t they have some memories of parties their 15 year old attended, some memory of when they drove her places and when other people brought her home — and perhaps even some memory of a night when their daughter returned early and distraught?"These are excellent questions that have been on the minds of lots of people. Why are her family members silent and distant from her?
This author is utterly incapable of the most rudimentary logical thought. If anyone among Ford’s family or friends at the time could back up her claims, we would have already heard from them!
This process established a ground-breaking precedent, just as Cavanaugh had said. Let’s act on that:
It is a certainty that some of Bill Clinton’s judges committed sex crimes. Not only is the ex-president well established as the most vile individual to ever be elected, but he befriended other perverts and rewarded his mistress with a federal job.
Where did Clinton first meet his judicial appointees? Pedophile Island? On the plane flying there? Did he meet them in other child brothels? Or outside a sex slave’s door during a gang rape? Did Congressman Weiner or his wife recommend any names? Did the brazen adulterer, ‘Reverend’ Jesse Jackson, offer any names?
Since we cannot trust the word of someone as deceitful as Bill Clinton his claims would be worthless. And his FBI was compromised. Therefore we must investigate the high school and college backgrounds of all Clinton appointees, and vetting of his associates should be renewed vigorously.
Many Clinton judges belong to NAMBLA [North American Man Boy Love Association] — we should find out who. And private donations should be permitted to hire assistance to the FBI [since part of the Flake Rule is to tolerate that].
I guarantee it — we would hit so much paydirt that the federal courts would be a lot better off. You can’t imagine how pleasantly surprised I am that the democrats now seek such sterling piety.
But I have a nagging suspicion that democrats would oppose this. Why? Do they have something to hide from the FBI? Challenge them the way Senator Durbin challenged Kavanaugh, and according to the Flake Rule they must agree.
~~~
‘The Flake Rule’, Purging Pervs fr Judiciary
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3691803/posts
-——The truth will not save us-——
There is no truth. The truth has been so obfuscated it can never be known
Senator McConnel will provide the solution by calling the vote and having the votes, confirm the nomination of Justice Kavnaugh
Even if every word she says is true, it’s still irrelevant. They guy was a minor at the time and his record would have been expunged.
I suspect that Flake will never approve it. He’s a lame duck and a McCainiac Rat.
So Chuckie's been in the crosshairs? ROTFLMAO! Knowing nothing about this case I don't have the first clue whether this claim was,in fact,justified...or unjustified. But assuming,for the moment,that it was unjustified then Chuckie,at least,understands what it is to be falsely accused.
A while ago I was falsely accused of a crime by a guy who was under investigation for having made $75 million of other people's money disappear.Unless I'm mistaken he's still under investigation by the SEC.
After having spent thousands in legal bills and court costs I was able to irrefutably prove my innocence but I must admit that I was outraged by this scumbag's accusation.
I almost didn’t read because it WAS Douthat, but it was a surprisingly ‘fair’ article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.