Maybe It Was All a Figment of Ford's Imagination

Eagle Action Report ^ | 9/28/2018 | Robin Blonstein

[Abakumov]

Is it just me or did you notice a huge disconnect between Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s older appearance and the baby-like quality of her voice and presentation?

The juxtaposition was hard to miss.

I am not trying to shame her, but she looks exceedingly older for her age than one would expect. Sometimes time isn't kind to us, but the mismatch between her inner world and her outer self is a huge discrepancy.

For a woman who was by her account in a stressful situation in the hearing room, as she said “terrified,” she seemed to be all smiles and enjoying the doting attention of the men and women around her, whether her handlers or others.

Although she spoke with a teeny tiny baby voice, her eyes were blank and staring into space virtually expressionless. Her glasses seemed to be like props. Deliberately oversized as if to somehow emphasize she was in possession of high intellect. Or at least that was the vibe that I got. It didn't sell me.

She seemed highly agitated and irritated. I found her painful to watch and listen to because the way she presented herself was so at odds with the level of maturity I expected from a woman of 51. Everything about her seemed inauthentic. The looks didn't match the voice, didn't match the eyes, didn't match the glasses. Her periodic joyous smiles at all the attention she was receiving seemed inappropriate. And no matter how many times she swigged down that Coke, I couldn't help but thinking she wasn't the "real thing".

Perhaps because she wasn't.

[Tell It Right]

She has a phd in psychology and thought she could pull one over with her baby voice act.

Plus, her appearance of looking 15 or so years older than she is from all the hard partying she’s accusing Judge K of doing. She projects much.

[Tennessee Nana]

Thank you !!!

for that event she should have had her hair up in a tidy bun or French twist...

and the big glasses on the head thing ???

she didnt need to google the info she used from the real case files...she had access to them as a mental health worker of sorts...

she picked here and there from real victims ordeals..

[usconservative]

It was all an ACT, designed to garner sympathy. EPIC FAIL.

[bgill]

Girls don’t go anywhere without their friends. No way would she 1) leave without Leland and 2) leave Leland there to be assaulted. Also, Leland would have called her asking why she’d left and would have gotten the story out of her. But, we all know Leland, her life long best friend, denied it ever happened and got thrown under the bus for that.

That story about the two front doors... on a rental. Hogwash. Who hosts Google (red flag!) interns? Now, we’re hearing about CIA connections. Dots.

[Tell It Right]

Her csv/resume should be amended to include that she’s got two front doors. :)

[tinyowl]

That was THE primary thing I noticed, the child act and/or merely who she is. I would say there is significant if not debilitating mental illness there. To act like a 6 year old to THAT extent is mind blowing.

But the left is one big safe space, and so long as you tow the party line, you are promised protection in their circles. IN fact, the more weak you are, the higher your status. The more disabilities, the higher your social rank.

That doesn't guarantee she's lying or subconsciously fabricating memories ... but it sure suggests it.

Lefties have a difficult time enough as it is distinguishing reality from the their own thinking and imagination ... add a little mental illness and there's no line between what's real and what isn't.

[07Jack]

Ford was outright lying and Rachel Mitchell was effective in subtly exposing her deceptiveness on many levels. At the time I questioned the use of Mitchell, but in retrospect it worked to perfection.

[Red Badger]

There was NO ANGER in her voice.

I expected ANGER TO THE MAX.

There was NONE....................

[x]

I believe she was very sexually active, and perhaps that’s why she is unstable.

That's possible. But a lot of what you may read about that has been made up by people who have no way of knowing what she was up to, so I tend to be skeptical about that explanation.

Or perhaps she was sexually assaulted as a child, perhaps leading to her promiscuity.

That's also possible, and more likely. In that case, though, the abuse would be the major factor, IMHO.

[rigelkentaurus]

Of course the entire thing is a fabrication. No doubt in my mind whatsoever. Zeo, nil, zilch credibility.

[CivilWarBrewing]

The smudgy glasses were an attempt at making her appear disheveled because she is 'traumatized', kind of like throwing pearls on Elana Kagan because she is a woman. LOL

Dr. Ford intentionally manipulated suppressed her voice in an attempt to make her seem more timid and shy, again, because she is 'traumatized'.

ALL PART OF THE ACT.

The CLINCHER for me was when Dr. Ford recounted Mark Judge and Bret Kavanaugh holding her down and laughing. DR. FORD WAS SMILING AS SHE RECOUNTED THIS! SAY WHAT?!!!!! SHE WOULD NOT BE SMILING AS SHE RECOUNTED WHAT WAS ALLEGEDLY FOR HER THE MOST TRAUMATIZING THING SHE REMEMBERS ABOUT THE ALLEGED INCIDENT!!!! SHE WAS READING ABOUT THEM LAUGHING, SO SHE SMILED. WHOOOPSY!!!!

[Freee-dame]

Her hair seemed to be part of the 15 year old demeanor attempt. Some high school girls do the hair falling forward followed by fingering it back over and over. She didn’t exactly get it right especially when some of the shorter hair was inside her glasses.

. I want to hear a YouTube of her speaking to a conference, class, etc. I cannot believe that she would use that same voice.

[OldMissileer]

I am not trying to shame her, but she looks exceedingly older for her age than one would expect.

She was rode hard (literally) and put away wet hundreds of times. That tends to make a person age fast.

[CivilWarBrewing]

"And no matter how many times she swigged down that Coke, I couldn't help but thinking she wasn't the "real thing". "

GREAT LINE, MS. BLONSTEIN!

[z3n]

If you have been attacked by a man...
If you feel traumatized, or disempowered, or humiliated by a man...
If you have had 30+ years for your fear, anger, and PTSD to fester...
If you have buried your specific memories, because they are too difficult to consciously live with...

What man would you choose (subconsciously) to project your anger and fear upon, if not the man who is about to become the most powerful man in the land to affect the outcome of an issue that makes you feel empowered?

Frankly, not only do I think she subconsciously projected her fear onto him because he poses the biggest threat to her constructed beliefs on female empowerment (choice), but I don’t believe that she don’t consciously know she has.

[Red Badger]

Maybe it was an outright LIE.................

[EagleUSA]

“...Its very simple: she is a liar....”

Specifically, she is a liberal lefty liar looking for a book deal...

[Blurb2350]

I don’t have a TV, but I heard much of her testimony — or whatever the proper term is — on the radio. She sounded like an overwrought junior high girl playing for sympathy. Her up-talking was bad enough, but the vocal fry was too much entirely. And, to put it bluntly, she didn’t seem very bright. It’s quite possible something happened to her during her binge-drinking days, but it’s pretty clear Kavanaugh wasn’t involved.

[Sooth2222]

Alcoholic hallucinosis

[budj]

The blinker apparently failed