Posted on 09/26/2018 12:01:31 PM PDT by reaganaut1
Some questions raised by the charges brought by Michael Avenatti and his client Julie Swetnick:
1. Given the seriousness of these allegations, why did Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnick decline to go directly to the police?
2. Likewise, why did Avenatti and Swetnick bypass the press? Did anyone in the press look into this story? What did they find? The New York Times confirms that none of Ms. Swetnicks claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview. Why?
3. Where are the witnesses? The charge is of gang rape. Leave aside the question of whether Brett Kavanaugh was involved and forget for a moment that were debating whether he should be on the Supreme Court surely there are a whole host of victims, perpetrators, and witnesses to this monstrous crime. Where are they?
4. Is is not a little strange that there are only two details provided, and that they are happen to be public knowledge already? The two names given are Mark Judges and Brett Kavanaughs. The time given is BEACH WEEK, which is listed on the calendar that Brett Kavanaugh released this morning. Why is there nothing new?
5. According to the New York Times, Swetnick left school in 1980, and then went on to college. Swetnick claims that she attended at least 10 house parties in the Washington area from 1981 to 1983 where the two were present. That means that, at the time of the alleged incident(s), she was between 18 and 20-years-old at the least, and that Kavanaugh and Judge were between 16 and 18 at the most. Why was she, an adult, attending high-school parties with minors?
6. Kavanaugh says that hes never heard of the accuser. Is there anyone who can testify to the contrary? If so, how did they meet? What relationship did Kavanaugh have with her school, Gaithersburg High? Swetnick claims that she met Judge Kavanaugh and Mr. Judge in 1980 or 1981. Why did she, an 18- or 19-year-old, start hanging out with Kavanaugh and Judge, who were 15 or 16, depending on the year?
7. Why would an adult go repeatedly to parties at which minors were being gang raped, and, having figured out what was going on, resolve only to avoid the punch? Did Ms. Swetnick tell anybody what she had seen? Why did she keep going back?
These fabricated allegations have already jumped the shark and are perilously close to the epidemic of prosecutions, a new Salem Witch Trial of day-care employees and owners from 25-30 years ago, when lawyers and LE decided to go “all-in” in the bid to look like public heroes. One of these prosecutions put Margaret Kelly Michaels, our fellow NJsian, and a thoroughly innocent person, in prison for years. Before long we’ll have Kavanaugh accused of having these girls eating their own feces, and engaged in satanic rituals where dogs and cats had their heads chopped off, and the girls were forced to drink the blood. Somewhere in the background of all this the current image of Bill Cosby hovers,laughing after his prison sentencing, and you know how the anti-Kavanaugh Red Guard are gloating because they’d like to see it happen to BK.
Yes. Fruit of Feminism:
Hedonistic, amoral female teachers now seduce and rape as much as hedonistic, amoral male teachers.
I know they go to the bathroom together...
In reply to Question #6 as to why did a girl of about 18-19 want to go out with a boy 15-16, the answer is easy.
Swetnick (I knew her cousin Nudnick) though that she was Chinese and had to have “Sum Yung Boi” for dinner.
The nice (I guess) thing about this whole Demwit-incited fiasco is, EVERYONE is reminded that THIS is how the Demagogic Party behaves, and was behaving this way LONG BEFORE there was a candidate for President, Donald Trump.
Julie Swetnick Was Served with Restraining Order by Former Boyfriend
National Review | September 26, 2018 8:41 PM | Jack Crowe
Posted on 09/26/2018 6:55:11 PM PDT by snarkytart
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3691070/posts
Wasn’t Moore taken out on similar charge. 20 yrs old hanging out with/dating high school girls?
Good guess!
Never bothered ME much!!
THE
DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS SECTION 132
5157, Emma Smith is counseled (commanded) to be faithful and true; 5866, Laws governing the plurality of wives are set forth.
51 Verily, I say unto you: A commandment I give unto mine handmaid, Emma Smith, your wife, whom I have given unto you, that she stay herself and partake not of that which I commanded you to offer unto her; for I did it, saith the Lord, to aprove you all, as I did Abraham, and that I might require an offering at your hand, by covenant and sacrifice.
52 And let mine handmaid, Emma Smith, areceive all those that have been given unto my servant Joseph, and who are virtuous and pure before me; and those who are not pure, and have said they were pure, shall be destroyed, saith the Lord God.
53 For I am the Lord thy God, and ye shall obey my voice; and I give unto my servant Joseph that he shall be made ruler over many things; for he hath been afaithful over a few things, and from henceforth I will strengthen him.
55 But if she will not abide this commandment, then shall my servant Joseph do all things for her, even as he hath said; and I will bless him and multiply him and give unto him an ahundredfold in this world, of fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters, houses and lands, wives and children, and crowns of beternal lives in the eternal worlds.
|
I hope she goes to hell when she dies, and loses all credibility in the interim. Her story is not believable.
https://www.ozy.com/need-to-know/is-amy-coney-barrett-trumps-scotus-backup-plan/89437
If I were a Democrat, I would be careful about wishing for Kavanaugh’s downfall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.