How exactly do you prove rape 50-60 years on?
“How exactly do you prove rape 50-60 years on?”
You don’t.
Even 5 years is a stretch, at best.
QUIT SAYING RAPE!
She accused him of inappropriately touching. She doesn’t even say it it was her breast, or rear end, or baby toe or left ear lobe. She admits she was fully dressed and he put a hand on her over her clothing.
It is a lie, but for those who believe her lie, the incident is exactly nothing, especially in the context of the time it happened and the ages of the people involved.
The jails would still be filled today if I had to turn in every 17 year old boy I saw touch a 16 year old girl without asking her permission first, when I was in high school.
I mean, for crying out loud, even if she were not lying THERE IS NO THERE, THERE.
This is pure modern PC insanity. A dumb 17 year old boy gropes the barely budding breast of a 16 year old girl, and that is now a capital offense? We have gone completely insane today?
Not that it happened, because the commie rat activist accuser is LYING.
“How exactly do you prove rape 50-60 years on?”
Some states removed the SOL based on DNA evidence. For example, a woman is raped. She reports it, has DNA taken, no match. 20 years later, a guy is arrested for another crime and it turns out his DNA matches, as does his description. So the state wants to be able to prosecute that person. And I agree.
In this case, I wouldn’t call it attempted rape. Even if everything she said was the gospel truth, it would be teenagers groping. Which is something a lot of teens have done...
There was no Rape or even an allegation of Rape.
Of course the Media doesn’t care, they have already called Judge Kavanaugh a Rapist.
When this alleged incident occurred there was a Statute of Limitation in place and for good reason.
Getting rid of the Statute of Limitations is akin to inventing Hate Crime Laws. Feel good nonsense that eviscerates the Rule of Law and creates Crimes where none exist to appease the Leftists.
Maybe:
the
blue
bikini
dum
dum
dum
duhhhhhhhhhhh!
[Or was it a full bathing suit? That, we will learn during ‘discovery’.]
She may have preserved her blue dress with semen stains?
Her allegation doesn’t mention rape, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Maryland doesn’t try to make this a rape case. What’s the statute of limitations on going to second base? How many violations like that are out there for exploiting?
This whole thing is nuts.
“RAPE”?
She isn’t claiming rape! What she is claiming is before foreplay.
I would agree with you if you wrote "How exactly do you prove assault 50-60 years on?"
How exactly do you prove rape 50-60 years on?
First she does not claim it was rape.
At most it was a clumsy grope outside her clothe.
But same question, how would you prove it, even ten minutes after the fact let alone 30 plus years later
Her statements are that penetration did not happen, so it was not rape. It may have been sexual assault in the form of groping. At least that is what I read.
How can you rape someone with several layers of clothing that remain on the whole time?