Posted on 09/17/2018 5:34:21 PM PDT by Helicondelta
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...
Play misty for me
Heh. Where are all the proud slutwalkers *now*? All the GOP Senators ought to be playing with toy trains during the hearings.
There are already tweets out there that she admitted to having 64 sexual partners (11th grade through college) and others talking about her blowing multiple boys in the back of a station wagon. Unsubstantiated rumors? So what. It won’t destroy a career like her unsubstantiated LIES are.
She very well may have done those things.
But you don’t know it, nor do you know the identity of the people that have posted that stuff online.
You may enjoy shooting yourself in the foot. Please do not make the rest of us suffer the consequences of your foolishness.
No it is democrats just being democrats but I can see how you may see the likeness
Funny how things work out. I had a girl friend in HS named Cheryl. Then I dated a Diane. Then I dated another Cheryl. So, things like that might happen because if you think about it, names of people go in cycles. Parents name their son or daughters by names that are popular at that time. Names that are popular at that time, will find a lot of girls being named that name and boys the same. I have seen that a couple of times. Happened when we named our daughter, only to run into a lot of that name along the way.
That is just wong
In the fourth grade we had five Mike’s in our class. The teacher called them: Mike One, Mike two, Mike three, Mike four and Mike five.
John, maybe you forgot, Roy Moore asked the girls’mom for permission to date them, and walked one girl home when she refused advances.
Kavanaugh’s accuser went alone and unescorted to a house with 4 horny teenage boys where alcohol was served; there are other tweets that she confessed 64 sexual partners spanning 11th grade thru college, and she blew multiple guys in the back of a station wagon. Oh, and Kavanaugh’s mom was the presiding judge in a foreclosure case against her parents. And the Dems scrubbed her social media history. No smell of fish at all.
Heh heh heh. But you’ve got no problem with utterly unsubstantiated accusations destroying a US Federal Judge’s *career*. Because Handmaid’s Tail. And Pussy Hat. And raised eyebrows.
.
When I tried to track down my old girlfriends, I was shocked at the number of women named Bambi, Cherry, Amber, and Chrystal,
I'm not the one who did the media's bidding. I'm not the one who fell for their deliberately faked up load of crap.
Everybody talks about the Hannity interview and blames Moore for how it turned out, but nobody looks at it fairly.
Hannity basically accepted the false equivalency that was put forth by that vile reporter from the Washington Post (she made up the "N***er Rock" smear against Rick Perry in Texas) in which dating teenagers is equivalent to rape and molestation.
The person who blew that interview was Hannity who focused on the dating of teenagers instead of focusing on the fake accusations of rape and molestation, which were the only potentially real offenses Moore was claimed to have committed.
Hannity set the standards as "If you dated Teenagers, you are a scumbag", and Moore was completely taken aback by that hostile approach. Moore didn't expect that, and he wasn't prepared for it.
New York is just fine with a 30 something old man dating young teenagers when it's someone they don't already hate because of his religious beliefs.
Seinfeld was 39 at the time.
I see he dated Irish to Irish. Awesome!
“I want Blakey Fords ENTIRBE HISTORY!! My guess, since she a PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSOR, she’s CRAZY as a LOON!!”
Whenever psychiatric testimony is presented in the course of a criminal trial, the shrink testifying for the defense is adamant that the defendant is innocent; the prosecution’s shrink is equally as adamant that he/she is guilty.
An adage by an old friend, “The only time a psychiatrist should be allowed to testify in court is as the defendant”.
I disagree. I am appalled at the circus Kavenaugh is being subjected to, and think that the very instant that it was revealed that the “memories” to which Ms. Ford will testify were “recovered” during psychoanalysis the claim became a bogus non-issue.there is absolutely no relation hereToo many good men were ruined in the 1990s because
- their daughters were unhappy enough to have wanted to undergo psychological therapy, and
- they made enough money to be able to pay for their daughters’ psychoanalysis.
That is all it takes to ruin a man. The thing about memory is this: you cannot access a memory without the likelihood of modifying it. All the psychiatrist has to do is ask leading questions, and the patient can absolutely convince her (or him) self that some particular thing happened in the past. Absolutely irrespective of whether that is even possibly true.
The poor guy who gets accused by a woman psychoanalysis patient after that unethical “recovered memory” process has been perpetrated is basically fried. Unless he has a stroke of luck in which concrete evidence exists to absolutely disprove “memories” - memories of which the patient is absolutely certain and can pass a lie detector test with flying colors - his life is over.
This is settled science, and “recovered memories” are no longer to be accepted in court.
To the contrary, there is a direct parallel to the Moore case in the nature of the “evidence.” Anita Hill’s allegations are similar only in that they are transparently aimed at defeating the confirmation of the nomination of an eminently qualified man to SCOTUS. Anita Hill was talking about things that she claimed to directly remember, things that harked back less than a decade. There is no comparison at all between that evidence (by, in your opinion and mine, a liar) and the “recovered memory” pseudo evidence with which first Roy Moore, and now Brett Kavenaugh, were abused., unless you’re just desperate to prove a relationship for selve serving reasons. these couldn’t be any more different men, or different situations, or different circumstances. and with all due respond to your honorable grandmother, I just don’t see how on earth she’s connected to any of this.
I mentioned that my grandmother was 15 years junior to my grandfather. But say the same thing the other way, and - by the standards you apply to Roy Moore - you are asserting that my grandfather was a creep. Thanks, but no thanks.
I graduated in 1957 from a 4 year high school that had a total enrollment of less than 600. In my graduating class of 93 or so, we had 5 KARENS. I know -— was one of them.
Yeah, it is known he tried to hang around the set of ER, just to see actress Maura Tierney.
Yep-—the gravity of the charge ....an entire book could be written on this profoundly twisted (an fundamentally “legalistic”) development in our partisan political life. It’s the bookend to the corollary development of “the criminalization of political differences”-—all the more pathetic considering that there is really very little actual difference (in another development) between the two political parties (the “Uniparty)-—the biggest difference is that the Dems have perfected the procedures and the application of this particular kind of political dishonesty.
I don’t disagree and don’t get me started on Hannity, I have work to do. But I still wish Moore had been more forceful in a denial anywhere - everywhere. He looked like he didn’t have a defense ready. Bad form for a lawyer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.