Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kavanaugh should not decide any cases concerning Trump
The Houston Chronicle ^ | September 9, 2018 | Ruth Marcus, The Washington Post

Posted on 09/09/2018 2:55:28 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Under the unusual circumstances surrounding his selection, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should have agreed to recuse himself from deciding cases involving the investigation of President Trump. The reason Kavanaugh asserted at his confirmation hearing for refusing to make such a pledge — that it would violate the imperative of judicial independence — is entirely unconvincing.

In turn, senators should decline to approve Kavanaugh’s nomination unless he does so. And, since that’s not likely to happen, in the event that a case involving the Trump investigation were to come before a Justice Kavanaugh, he should not participate — for his own good and the good of the institution he is poised to join.

The unusual circumstances are these: The president selected a Supreme Court nominee while under criminal investigation. The nominee he chose happened to be one who has expressed clear — and controversial — views about the wisdom of investigating a sitting president.

In addition, that nominee suggested that the leading case on the president’s responsibility to comply with a subpoena, U.S. v. Nixon, “maybe ... was wrongly decided — heresy though it is to say so.” Finally, although I wouldn’t go so far down this conspiracy rabbit hole myself, the nominee did not appear on the original lists of potential Supreme Court choices; his name was only added to a list released after the special counsel investigation was launched....

(Excerpt) Read more at houstonchronicle.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abortion; bobwoodward; brettkavanaugh; districtofcolumbia; houstonchronicle; impeachment; indictment; jeffbezos; kavanaugh; maga; mediawingofthednc; mueller; nixon; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; ruthmarcus; scotus; smearmachine; supremecourt; trump; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: mindburglar

Kagan recused herself from 25 cases when she first joined the court, as she had served as the government’s chief advocate prior to her appointment.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130205734


41 posted on 09/09/2018 4:15:46 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy's doubt Joe shakes everyone's hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

this is leftists trying to control the narrative.

The best thing to do is to say NO.

Dont argue with them.

Say No.


42 posted on 09/09/2018 4:18:13 AM PDT by Chickensoup ( Leftists fascists today plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

Dems retreated after the civil rights era among others, but their tactics from that regrouping/retreating time are now blossoming into full socialism and all that comes with it.

The argument is not ‘retreating’, but what will they do next to destroy America ... or in the words of one ‘activist’, “make America what it was meant to be” ...


43 posted on 09/09/2018 4:23:13 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh and Ginsburg should?


44 posted on 09/09/2018 4:25:25 AM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No more Beauregard recusals.


45 posted on 09/09/2018 4:27:51 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond
Did any Clinton appointed justices weigh in on Bush vs. Gore, 2000?
46 posted on 09/09/2018 4:28:43 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skr

Which gave her cover to not recuse herself when it really counted.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/06/elena_kagan_the_obamacare_recusal_that_wasnt.html


47 posted on 09/09/2018 4:29:20 AM PDT by mindburglar (I like spelling it Lazers. It looks cooler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Under the unusual circumstances surrounding his selection, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should have agreed to recuse himself from deciding cases involving the investigation of President Trump. The reason Kavanaugh asserted at his confirmation hearing for refusing to make such a pledge — that it would violate the imperative of judicial independence — is entirely unconvincing.

Ironic - a delusional nutcase claims that the common sense Truth is....unconvincing.....and a sign of some serious ulterior motivation.....

Heard "Lady Madonna" playing in my head,,,

Lady Madonna lying on the bed Listen to the music playing in your head

might play with the words to work in cockroaches and how they run along with some other traits of the loony Left.

48 posted on 09/09/2018 4:30:04 AM PDT by trebb (So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond
When will these people realize that they LOST?

They haven't lost.

It's up to Trump and the forces loyal to him to cram it down their throats and to make them choke on it.

Until that happens, we really can't declare a winner.

49 posted on 09/09/2018 4:30:33 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mo

Yep. And the fact that Obama was a false president means his 2 Supreme Court justices are also null and void.


50 posted on 09/09/2018 4:31:48 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hmmm......... from Houston a voice of stupidity polluting the readership


51 posted on 09/09/2018 4:35:56 AM PDT by bert ((KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Muller..... conspiracy to over throw the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond

“When will these people realize that they LOST?”

Hopefully when they get pounded into the dirt in the midterms.


52 posted on 09/09/2018 4:36:18 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nor should Ginsburg,Kagan or Bryer.


53 posted on 09/09/2018 4:41:05 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (I've Never Owned Slaves...You've Never Picked Cotton.End Of "Discussion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ooops...should be:

Nor should Ginsburg,Kagan,Bryer or Sotomayor.

54 posted on 09/09/2018 4:45:55 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (I've Never Owned Slaves...You've Never Picked Cotton.End Of "Discussion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

That’s a man, baby!


55 posted on 09/09/2018 4:47:44 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Houston Comical is one seriously worthless birdcage liner.


56 posted on 09/09/2018 4:52:20 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr
She didn't recuse herself from the notorious Obamacare ruling even though she helped draft that piece of legislation.
57 posted on 09/09/2018 4:52:38 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not Kavanaugh, but is Gorsuch ok?

And, if the Dem conspiracy unravels enough to implicate Obama, will Kagan and Sotomayor recuse? And, if a case involves a Clinton, will Ginsburg be expected to recuse?


58 posted on 09/09/2018 4:53:25 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Agree Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor should all recuse themselves, using the same logic. (Or far more basic logic.)


59 posted on 09/09/2018 5:00:44 AM PDT by Sooth2222 (Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Popman
First sentence is a lie, I have assume the rest of the article is as well

Well, you *do* have to give the author credit for being considerate of other people's time. By making the first sentence a lie, she saved us the time of having to read any of the rest of the article.

60 posted on 09/09/2018 5:02:18 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson