Posted on 08/10/2018 6:17:19 AM PDT by artichokegrower
California is moving toward becoming the first state to require companies to have women on their boards assuming the idea could survive a likely court challenge.
(Excerpt) Read more at santacruzsentinel.com ...
Its not only the right thing to do, its good for a companys bottom line.
And the government of California is such a well run entity where it needs to dictate to the private sector. Anyhow would a transgender count on way or the other?
Waiting for the State of California job posting for a Vagina Inspector.
You are on the the unfortunate right track. This is only the first step; next will come the requirement that all the special classes be represented on the boards and then, let’s just not bother with the Whites.
I identify as a woman ... who is attracted to women. Yes, that’s right. I’m an XY Lesbian, with intact fully functional external “plumbing”. How’s that for “diversity”.
Really.
You don't.
1) Too many "inspectees" will fail the inspection.
2) Does Dr. Chopitoff's work count?
3) Even the ones who pass, aren't the ones you want to see.
Will a tranny count?
Watch what's happening in South Africa. That's the end goal of the demoncrat party.
Ahh, lieberal bias - dripping with undertones that CA is leading the way, and more will certainly follow.
Any such law is illegal and unconstitutional.
Also, since there is an infinite spectrum of genders this is “unfair” to all those genders in between male and female. Besides, anyone can change his/her/its birth record and “become” legally another gender.
Q: if someone is given a position because of gender, and he/she/it changes his/her/its gender, is he/she/it guilty of fraud?
What about a man who simply self-identifies as a woman? Would he count? And if so, would he have to shave before every board meeting?
They could work for Trans International.
What is some of the guys, as a business decision, decided to “Identify” as women?
What if the company is run by women?
Do they have to hire a Man?
I’m guessing no.
The State might equally decree that any or all conceivable minorities also be represented on corporate boards - the mentally handicapped, left-handers, Lithuanians, etc.
The bottom line is that the State is directing how private business operates simply because it wants to, not to restrain any infringement on others by businesses. There is no end to the appetite for such arbitrary control over other people’s property and freedom.
Titular private ownership, with effective State control, is the Fascist economic model.
Typically, companies know whats good for their bottom line and do these things on their own without being forced by law.
“Im guessing no.”
Well, you see, the mere presence of a male makes the company less diverse. If the company is all female, it is diverse, because it does not have any men. The company would be even more diverse if it excluded Whites, because the presence of whites also decreases diversity.
>>Any such law is illegal and unconstitutional.<<
California is trying to prove just how successful liberal fascism can be!
Oh... I thought this said BEDROOM.
“Waiting for the State of California job posting for a Vagina Inspector.”
Laz, you need to call your lobbyist and get this one passed. I found your retirement gig!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.