Posted on 08/06/2018 10:58:44 AM PDT by 11th_VA
You have probably heard by now that the New York Times recently hired a racist. If you are familiar with the New York Times you probably weren’t to surprised by that but a lot of people out there are finally realizing that the liberal left doesn’t care about racism if it directed at white people...
Most rational people are confused as to how ‘Roseanne’ loses her job for one bad joke and people like Sarah Jeong are rewarded with jobs.
It looks like Wikipedia editors have decided to stick up for Jeong.
From The Daily Caller:
New York Times editorial board member Sarah Jeong’s Wikipedia page includes no mention of her racist tweets that resurfaced after her new position with the newspaper was announced, apparently because activist editors for the free online encyclopedia won’t allow any mention of her tweets.
There has been a lot of debate amongst Wikipedia writers and editors about whether or not mention of her racist tweets should be included on her page.
One edit request in favor of adding a section about her tweets said:
Sarah Jeong is infamous for her racists tweets on twitter, most of the people who know her name will know her by her tweets. Because of this, I think it is misleading to not say a single line about her racist tweets and simply label her as “an American journalist specializing in law and technology topics”.
An editor responded to the requests by saying, “First, it uses the word ‘found,’ which suggests a mainstream authority, preferably a scientific one. Second, ThePostOnline is an explicitly right-wing news site, according to wikipedia’s own article on it, and therefore not a reliable source.”
(Excerpt) Read more at chicksonright.com ...
Might as well describe Josef Mengele as a “visionary medical researcher”.
Wikipedia editors, as I understand it, are for the most part under 30 and socialist to the core.
That looks reasonable the way it is; perhaps they were shamed by the Daily Caller into being reasonable. Or they’ll censor it in the near future.
When this Sarah Jeong thing started the hypocrisy of firing Roseanne came to mind. The difference is not only does Jeong get to keep her job but she insulted a whole race. Roseanne only insulted one member of One race and that person is only possesses a small percentage of black blood. It is very, very hypocritical.
What’s wrong with Spotify? Links? (Just curious, I like it.)
they were part of the infowars ban over the last 24hrs
Most rational people are confused as to how ‘Roseanne’ loses her job for one bad joke and people like Sarah Jeong are rewarded with jobs. It looks like Wikipedia editors have decided to stick up for Jeong.
They had a twentysomething with no degreed background but a line of bull a mile long as their religion editor, until they were exposed as liars. Thanks 11th_VA.
Hmmm... Born in South Korea but doesn't like white people. I of course can't help but wonder where Ms. Jeong would be today if a whole bunch of white guys hadn't gotten themselves killed defending her birth country from the tender mercies of the communists currently running the totalitarian romper room in the North.
Every occasion of this should be documented under “Leftist Lies/Fraud/Dishonesty/Censorship/Data Manipulation” in Conservapedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia
BOYCOTT Wikipedia for their abuse of the truth
Need to start using phrases like :
“Nazi Style Truth” — since millenials and other recent (last 40 years) public school educations have been taught and thus recognize “nazi” attrocities/propaganda — but not communist attrocities/propaganda)
“Communist Style Truth” — doesnt resonate as much (but still can be used in more sane venues)
add to that :
“Nazi Style Science” — for the leftist media’s pushing/defending/assisting the global warming/climate change hoaxes
Its been that way for years. Politics or history or science subjects that might possibly maybe be remotely political are just pure garbage due to the overwhelming Left Wing slant.
True, which is why I recommend using “the democrat national socialist’s party “ and their “national socialist press corpes” ...
Speaking of wikipedia why does lisa page still have no wikipedia entry?
What a kook; she can go back and live with the Asians in South Korea (but she won’t).
A lot of self-hatred, low self-esteem, and envy in these unassimilated turd-worlders...
First, there's the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media, well settled into a groupthink as the propaganda bureaus of the Democratic Party and the left. Then there's Wikipedia, which is owned, controlled, and operated by radical-left community college dropouts, who think they're experts in a subject because they got a "C" in an entry level course on it. They have purported rules called "policies," but if the mob decides that the rules don't apply, then the rules don't apply.
Most people aren't familiar with Quinn Norton and Kevin Williamson. Google their names. Norton's racism was directed against black people. It was more far innocuous than Jeong's but the New York Times didn't hesitate for a moment to fire her. Williamson is opposed to abortion and went so far as to suggest that women who abort their children as birth control (i.e. not for a compelling medical reason) should be prosecuted and even executed. So of course The Atlantic fired him. ft in general. They normalize perversion, drug abuse and slacking off, and present this as though it's wonderful and there are no consequences.
Sarah Jeong is a racist. There can be no doubt that if she had said those awful things about any race or gender other than white men, her career would have been crushed, destroyed, and burned to ash as quickly and thoroughly as Roseanne Barr's.
Then we have Samantha Bee. Her shocking misogyny was directed against Ivanka Trump, so she got to keep her job. And Michelle Wolf's misogyny was directed at Sarah Huckabee Sanders, so the lunatic left-wing fringe loves her passionately and she got to keep her job. Roseanne Barr, however, directed her racism against Valerie Jarrett, so her lucrative career was destroyed, and her amazingly lucrative TV show was cancelled, in a matter of hours.
The winners and losers of this little game are being chosen by an online mob using social media. I am reminded of Caesar, responding to the cheers (or catcalls) of the mob, by holding his thumb up or down -- signaling whether a gladiator would be allowed to live, or be killed on the spot.
The message is absolutely crystal clear. Attack the favorite targets of the left and your career is golden. Bother one of their sacred cows and you'll be completely destroyed.
I’m on the left generally. I’ve lurked here for over a decade because I try to read broadly including people I disagree with. This wing of the left has always been present in academia and it’s one I sharply oppose.
It’s mindblowing to me the dems have now decided to embrace Jeong’s declaration of war on white people and her virulent, hateful, and unproductive take on race issues. If this keeps up Trump will ride the rust belt to reelection and deservedly so. I can’t vote for any politician that doesn’t disavow jeong.
I hope Trump’s 2020 victory shifts the overton window on these issues such that these people are driven from the public space for the next generation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.