Posted on 07/30/2018 11:41:31 AM PDT by Beowulf9
It has become a tiresome cliche on the left. President Trump is the new Hitler. His supporters are all Nazis. But is there any truth in these comparisons?Not according to a real-life survivor of Hitlers Germany, Marion Ingeborg Andrews, who gave entitled liberals a major reality check when she told them that liberals are the extremist group that most closely resemble the Nazis she grew up with.
(Excerpt) Read more at nynettle.com ...
78.
FED UP PROFESSOR #18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCIP_UdAw_o
Because these cultural Marxist controlled places churn out hundreds of thousands of NEW brain-washed yutes every year,
we’d better get a handle on THIS PROBLEM or everything else we do is akin to REARRANGING DECK CHAIRS ON THE TITANIC!
(I can almost hear the orchestra playing Nearer My God to Thee.)
What then when THEY vastly outnumber those of us who remember the Founders’ sacrifices and warnings?
FB CENSORSHIP
The Third Wave was the name given by history teacher Ron Jones to an experimental recreation of Nazi Germany which he conducted with high school students.
The experiment took place at Cubberley High School in Palo Alto, California, during one week in 1969[1]. Jones, unable to explain to his students why the German citizens (particularly non-Nazis) allowed the Nazi Party to exterminate millions of Jews and other so-called 'undesirables', decided to show them instead. Jones writes that he started with simple things like classroom discipline, and managed to meld his history class into a group with a supreme sense of purpose and no small amount of cliquishness. Jones named the movement "The Third Wave," after the common wisdom that the third in a series of ocean waves is always the strongest, and claimed its members would revolutionize the world. The experiment allegedly took on a life of its own, with students from all over the school joining in;
If you read the comments from the article, several people say their mothers were 5 when the war ended and remember plenty about the Nazis. They say living in a war will imprint your brain with memories most children wouldn’t have. They also had parents/ friends/ relatives talking with them and around them about events of the time.
The left projects everything they do onto conservatives, everything.
That’s actually quite correct.
From the mouth of first hand experience.
The left are Nazis.
But we knew that.
Alinskys The Rules for Radicals:
1. Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. Power is derived from 2 main sources money and people. Have-Nots must build power from flesh and blood.
2. Never go outside the expertise of your people. It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
3. Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
4. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
5. Ridicule is mans most potent weapon. There is no defense. Its irrational. Its infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
6. A good tactic is one your people enjoy. Theyll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. Theyre doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Dont become old news.
8. Keep the pressure on. Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
11. If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive. Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Never let the enemy score points because youre caught without a solution to the problem.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster
I used to wonder how Hitler got people to kill for him.
I see today’s liberals being all too willing to kill Trump supporters if they had tacit government approval (or at least looking the other way- like they are for HilLIARy’s crimes)
Exactly !
Well, since the last legal meeting of the NSDAP was >73 years ago, I’m not sure how much recollection of Nazi evil a five year old would have.
My Mom was born in Denmark in 27 and lived through the occupation. Her views about our great country were similar to those of the woman described in the posted article.
I believe I’ve heard of that class exercise before.
If not, it was something similar along the same lines.
I’ll check out your reference.
Thank you.
This little 10 minute video does just that.
Types of Government, Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4r0VUybeXY
The communists and Nazis hated each other not because of their differences, but because of their similarities.
Scratch a liberal, find a communist.
Bkmrk.
A reminder of how recent the events of the mid 20th Century really were. And yet people act as though the history is relevant as it applies to numerous issues we confront today.
I hear this a lot in S Florida but I can’t change these demented liberals so I just say..WELL YOU KNOW WHAT’S NEXT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.