Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/17/2018 12:45:31 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: yesthatjallen

We have political prisoners in this country. Just ask Scooter Libby.


2 posted on 07/17/2018 12:46:25 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

No collusion.


3 posted on 07/17/2018 12:47:26 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The right to be confronted by your accused. This POS continues to operate as if he is running the star chamber.


4 posted on 07/17/2018 12:47:30 PM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

how bout those 12 russians putin invited you to interview?


5 posted on 07/17/2018 12:49:01 PM PDT by sappy (criminaldems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Sounds like blackmail under color of law.


6 posted on 07/17/2018 12:49:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600><p>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Poor Manafort. Not necessarily defending him, but he has become Mueller’s only hope in not disgracing himself.

Hey, at least I took Manafort down.

I cracked him like a walnut in solitary for so long...

Mueller, you scrounge...


8 posted on 07/17/2018 12:51:07 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Take a look out there folks. Can you see evidence of a Left Wing Hate Group, perhaps fascist too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Mueller made the request in a court filing Tuesday afternoon, which also requests that the identity of the potential witnesses remain under seal.

_______________________________________________

Ahhh. Secret unnamed witnesses. Why that’s Constitutional, right?

/sarc


9 posted on 07/17/2018 12:51:30 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Immunity for Podesta’s??


10 posted on 07/17/2018 12:51:41 PM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

11 posted on 07/17/2018 12:52:12 PM PDT by Geronimo (God Bless America and President Donald J. Trump...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

“intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on his behalf”

What agencies concluded it was on Trumps behalf?


12 posted on 07/17/2018 12:52:23 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Lay all the cards on the table. No deals. No immunity. No secret tribunals. Let's have all the truth and let the chips fall where they may.

Mueller and Rosenstein are intent on running an opaque Kafkaesque Star Chamber. It is an insult to American justice. Show us everything.
 

15 posted on 07/17/2018 12:54:35 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

BOy that mueller team leaks like a sieve.


16 posted on 07/17/2018 12:56:36 PM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Immunity should NEVER include immunity against perjury. Otherwise immunity becomes a license to do and say whatever you want - and to wage a vendetta, without fear of prosecution.

How is it that if a drug dealer testifies against a drug lord, the testimony is questioned and sometimes invalidated because the drug dealer could just be trying to cut a deal to save themselves, but these kinds of immunity deals are acceptable? How is it that the left think that information gathered from waterboarding is invalid, because it encourages false testimony - but information gathered from a plea deal with immunity is valid?

19 posted on 07/17/2018 12:57:01 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I am shocked I tell you. Completely shocked /s


20 posted on 07/17/2018 12:57:50 PM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc (#POTUS#Stable#Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This is way off what he is supposed to be doing or ,as the Federal District Judge in Virginia said “ Is he trying to construct testimony from the defendant” i,e suborn Perjury. No body cares about a supposed violation of a 2006 registration that nobody ever did. Trump will pardon him for sure. This is straight gestapo crap.


21 posted on 07/17/2018 12:59:22 PM PDT by raiderboy (Trump has assured us that he will shut down the government to get the WALL in Sept.ith the solar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Never let a good crisis go to waste. Use it grant Immunity to deep state crooks.


22 posted on 07/17/2018 1:02:00 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
The five individuals identified in the motions at issue are third parties who have not been charged in this matter,

I thought you got immunity because you are the guilty small fish helping take down the big fish. Is Manafort somehow now a big fish? and what that hell are is Mueller doing letting five guilty parties cop a plea? Sounds way more like collusion to falsely indict.

23 posted on 07/17/2018 1:02:24 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I’m looking forward to someday hearing people testify against MUELLER.


24 posted on 07/17/2018 1:05:49 PM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

from Wikipedia article on “Show Trials”

A show trial is a public trial in which the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant. The actual trial has as its only goal the presentation of both the accusation and the verdict to the public so they will serve as both an impressive example and a warning to other would-be dissidents or transgressors. Show trials tend to be retributive rather than corrective and they are also conducted for propagandistic purposes. The term was first recorded in the 1930s.

Show trials were a significant part of Joseph Stalin’s regime. The Moscow Trials of the Great Purge period (1937–38) in the Soviet Union are characteristic.

The authorities staged the actual trials meticulously. If defendants refused to “cooperate”—i.e., to admit guilt for their alleged and mostly fabricated crimes—they did not go on public trial, but suffered execution nonetheless.

Solid public evidence of what really happened during the Moscow Trials came to the West through the Dewey Commission (1937). After the collapse of the Soviet Union (1991), more information became available. This discredited the New York Times reporter Walter Duranty, who claimed at the time that these trials were actually fair.


25 posted on 07/17/2018 1:15:45 PM PDT by Montaignes Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Made up crap, too, is my guess.


26 posted on 07/17/2018 1:18:30 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for Brett Kavanaugh and President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson