She’s pro-abortion.
She got kicked off the Blaze for saying so on-air on her show.
FNC hired her as a contributor/opinionist.
I remember her on the One channel.
Stop giving them assurances and "playing nice". Tell them the USSC has as much right to limit or eliminate Roe as it had to discover the BS it's built on in the first place.
They're screaming about getting in the streets and fighting and how normal political consequences will lead to Civil War since they've totally failed so let's get down to it.
I don't have too many years left in this mortal coil and I'd damn sure rather face the sh?t than have it pushed off for my grandchildren to deal with.
JMHo
Because she is talking as if she were in the vicinity of the Constitution, I say, “Yer not from around here,are you?”
But she’s blonde and skinny.
Lots of people on our side will pseudo-complain about this, and then wait for her to whisper sweet nothings to them again.
Here’s how shallow F&F and Lahren are; if she looked like Ruth Bader Ginsburg she’d never be heard from.
The "liberal" - who are we kidding, leftist/socialist/fascist - mind is an awe inspiring, awful place...
Dumber than a bag of hammers.
Her view is pretty much mainstream, and if the GOP wants to win it will stick with government of the people, by the people. If you try to govern according to the ideology of 18% of the voters you will get 18% of the vote (unless you lie to people and they believe you). You won’t get much if anything done if you stick with the 18% as opposed to the majority who want limitations on abortion.
Sweetheart. Why dont you organize a constitutional amendment. One that says killing babies is just fine.
I doubt youll get a majority of states, but hey, thats how you do it.
Failing that, shut up.
Tell that to the Founding Fathers. It's the rights of the people to dictate how they are governed for the common welfare...
This may not be the US Constitution but it is the DoI that was the groundwork for the Constitution...
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
That, to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
"...That, whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
This implies that the people, regardless of the religious or philosophical beliefs, have the right to create laws that they deem necessary to secure "domestic tranquility" and "promote the general welfare".
Every time one of these people open their mouths, you realize just how shallow and vacuous they are.
Why has the captain of the high school cheer-leading team been given a place of importance in the conservative media world?
It is likely that she has had an abortion(s) and has shame and guilt over it (as most women who have aborted their babies do).
She MUST defend her crime(s) to the bitter end or until Jesus changes her life.
Pro Abortion (Choice) Christian? NO SUCH THING! (Some THINK they can fool God, the hubris of some people!)
And this is the very reason I never liked this quasi-conservative pretty faced pig. She dares to call herself conservative all the while preaching abortion just like her liberal cocktail buddies do. She’s no conservative.
I am surprised that Tomi Lahren apparently is not aware of the Constitutional issues with Roe.
She comes across like she does not know what she is talking about.
BTW, the Constitution is not affirming a pro-life belief that the fetus is a child. The Constitution affirms the inalienable rights of the individual. The issue is that NO ONE. .not pro-lifers or pro-abortion . . .NO ONE. ..knows when, in fact, human life begins. Both sides have only beliefs about whether the fetus is fully human or not. The right Constitutional path is, given that no one knows the moment when life begins and because pursuing life as one of our endowed rights is, therefore, evidence that life is precious. ..it is in the interest of society and thus the Constitution to err on the side of protecting life in ALL its known phases, i.e. from conception to birth.
Bottomline: Tomi is a ignorant big mouth ass!!
Even Darth Vader Ginsburg called Roe bad law. It should be a decision at the state level according to the Constitution, although no good state would give sanction to human sacrifice.
No life, liberty and persute of happiness to the unborn.
However, I disagree with her contention that a Justice's having the intention of "gunning" for Roe would be unConstitutional. There's nothing in the Constitution that requires a Justice to start from the assumption that all previous decisions are valid. Stare decisis is extra-Constitutional judicial philosophy ... as, indeed, is the whole concept of judicial review as practiced since Marbury v. Madison. We all (most all) accept it, but it's not in the text.