BTW, the Constitution is not affirming a pro-life belief that the fetus is a child. The Constitution affirms the inalienable rights of the individual. The issue is that NO ONE. .not pro-lifers or pro-abortion . . .NO ONE. ..knows when, in fact, human life begins. Both sides have only beliefs about whether the fetus is fully human or not. The right Constitutional path is, given that no one knows the moment when life begins and because pursuing life as one of our endowed rights is, therefore, evidence that life is precious. ..it is in the interest of society and thus the Constitution to err on the side of protecting life in ALL its known phases, i.e. from conception to birth.
Bottomline: Tomi is a ignorant big mouth ass!!
“The issue is that NO ONE. .not pro-lifers or pro-abortion . . .NO ONE. ..knows when, in fact, human life begins. Both sides have only beliefs about whether the fetus is fully human or not”
You are discussing two different things here as if they were the same - is your issue when ‘human life begins’, or when the fetus is ‘fully human’?
Which is it that ‘no one knows’?