Posted on 07/06/2018 12:47:38 PM PDT by rktman
DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez represents the future of our party. DSA chapter chairs have agreed that communism is good. One DSA caucus calls its members revolutionary Marxists.
A far-left group behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which includes Ocasio-Cortez, is creeping its way into the mainstream of American politics.
Ocasio-Cortez shocking primary upset of Democratic New York Rep. Joe Crowley on June 26 elevated both her profile and that of the DSA, which helped boost her to victory. DSA member rolls have skyrocketed since President Donald Trumps victory in the 2016 election, and Ocasio-Cortezs victory appears to have accelerated that trend.
Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairman Tom Perez said the 28-year-old socialist represents the future of our party on Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Unfortunately, they'll probably stick us with Pence. :-(
That bird flew eight years ago.
They already took it over.
Oops, meant to say ten years ago.
I find it humorous now that many on the Socialist left would claim to be “anti-Communist.” But frankly, the jump wasn’t too much. It’s like the difference between drinking 4/5ths of a bottle of Jack Daniels’ and drinking the whole bottle. Once you’re almost there, you can go all the way easy.
They have less than NO idea what they claim and/or are lying. And sadly, almost nobody knows any factual history any more.
But I understand your analogy, at the end and agree.
And in 2020. Discard me and my kind at your own peril. We are the swings who put you into power.
Never forget.
We have guns and families, too, so don't be so bigoted.
Guns, God and Gold.
LoL!
The Leftists already took over the Dem Party - in 1972. It is just that then they could not preach the Communist crap that they’re doing now, as we were in the midst of the Cold War and virtually the entire WW2 generation was still alive and wouldn’t put up with that crap (and, as it is, the country soundly rejected the Dems by giving Nixon the largest landslide in at least 40 years).
Since 1972, it has been getting steadily worse, with a minor break in the mid-’90s when Clinton got his clock cleaned and HAD to veer a bit back toward the center in order to get re-elected. Other than that, this is a slow-motion train wreck that gets worse with every passing week.
This is, BTW, the direct result of Communist infiltration of our educational system starting in the 1930s, which was preceded by at least 30 years of “progressive” indoctrination care of John Dewey. We normals have let them get away with it for over a century, and this crap is the result. God help us when the Dems win the Presidency again.
Early 20th century, state sovereignty-ignoring Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendal Holmes promoted in Missouri v. Holland what is actually the constitutionally limited federal power ignoring idea imo of living Constitution.
More specifically, the so-called living Constitution is nothing more than a politically correct, anti-state sovereignty argument that pro-centralized power radicals successfully use to subvert the will of the Constitutions Article V state majority as enumerated in the Constitution imo.
In fact, in stark contrast to Holmes promotion of lose interpretations of the Constitution, Thomas Jefferson had wisely suggested the following. Jefferson had suggested interpreting the feds enumerated powers narrowly, the states amending the Constitution for specific new powers when narrow interpretations of existing powers wont reasonably work.
"In every event, I would rather construe so narrowly as to oblige the nation to amend, and thus declare what powers they would agree to yield, than too broadly, and indeed, so broadly as to enable the executive and the Senate to do things which the Constitution forbids. Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.
Antifa ? No. I meant the old timers on the left, way, way back.
Close to 20 years ago, I was talking to some guy online who described himself as a (New York) Socialist. He had run for office as such. He was trying to break down for me (as someone on the right) the variations of the different leftist branches (i.e. Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist/Maoist/Trotskyite, et al). For me, it was just like someone getting into an argument over which brand of Mayonnaise was better. Aside from a different branding on the jar, it’s all basically the same. Just variations on anti-American totalitarianism.
Antifa is just your basic domestic terrorists of the ultra-left. Although I’m sure many Democrats sympathize with their agenda, they can’t openly support it (’cept maybe Maxine Waters) because it would cause them harm at the ballot box.
Pence might be learning a thing or two from Trump.
Time was, once,when they would just admit to being a COMMIE. But this different shades of RED, is weird. Just as the Nazis were the other head of the same coin as Commies.
The CPUSA always endorses Dems. They don’t even run a candidate for president. Democrats are communists and communists are Democrats. Problem is that too many quisling Republicans are too.
You got that right, partner. When I told my son that employment statistics show that unemployment levels of blacks, Latinos and women are at the lowest levels EVER, he said he hadn't heard of it.
The Main stream media REALLY IS the enemy of the people. So dishonest.
The tense is wrong
Seek to overtake is actually have overtaken
The diff between Hitler and Stalin is that they were competing for the same nutter votes and supporters. Nazism was called “right wing” (however falsely) because it was the “opposition” to the “left wing” Communists. The reality is they were merely two different prongs on the left wing fork.
Europe, sadly, has never had an authentic real “right-wing” pro-freedom, small-government type mass movement (although we’re seeing the start of it in Eastern Europe, i.e. Hungary). The “old right” in Europe was merely those who supported the monarchies vs. “the left” that was perceived to want to overthrow them for “democracy.” Technically, our Founding Fathers could’ve been called left-wingers for their stances. Of course, the REAL lefties were on full display in the ghastly French Revolution. Mass murder and mayhem.
The first step in solving the problem is identifying it.
A vote for democrats is a vote for a white minority.
Keep the message simple, no hate, no white supremacy.
Just keep the demographic frozen right where it is, at 62% white
Make them defend their policy of white decimation.
And should he follow Trump, in '24, he'll be worse than G.H.W. Bush!
Long,long, long ago, there was a small group here ( before he was Governor; IIRC ), who were enamored of Pence and kept trying to push for the rest of us to want hi to be president. I read whatever was posted, did my own research and was not just unimpressed by him, but did NOT want him to be anywhere near the presidency; let alone president! Have I changed my mind? HELL NO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.