Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer urges Trump to tap Merrick Garland for Supreme Court
MSN News ^ | July, 5, 2018 | Seung Min Kim, Robert Costa

Posted on 07/05/2018 12:00:47 PM PDT by detective

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) privately urged President Trump in a phone call earlier this week to nominate federal Judge Merrick B. Garland, then President Barack Obama’s third nominee to the Supreme Court who was summarily shunned by Senate Republicans in 2016, to replace retiring Justice Anthony M. Kennedy.

Trump had called Schumer on Tuesday afternoon for a Supreme Court-centered conversation that lasted less than five minutes, according to a person familiar with the call. Schumer, the person said, pressed the president to name Garland to succeed Kennedy, arguing doing so would help unite the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: acherrytreetoofar; babyharpseals; charlesschumer; chuckschumer; dumbass; garland; jackass; jerk; merrickgarland; schmuck; schumer; scotus; summerofdemocrathate; supremecourt; thebabyharpsealcure; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Kickass Conservative

>>Better yet, POTUS Trump should nominate Any Schumer to the Court.<<

Can you IMAGINE the heads exploding if he nominated Ted Cruz?

I would not put it past him in his ongoing “screwing with liberals’ heads” campaign.


21 posted on 07/05/2018 12:06:55 PM PDT by freedumb2003 ("please pass the winnamins" (/Principled on 6/27/2018))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: detective

It’s opposite year - Just do the opposite of what Chucky Schumer wants and the country will prosper.


22 posted on 07/05/2018 12:08:15 PM PDT by ProudDeplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Trump had called Schumer on Tuesday afternoon for a Supreme Court-centered conversation that lasted less than five minutes, according to a person familiar with the call.

I'm thinking that this was supposed to be a longer phone call, but about the time Schit-for-brains mentioned something as idiotic as Trump nominating Garland, Trump said, "Yep, we're done." CLICK!
23 posted on 07/05/2018 12:08:55 PM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is tolerance; diverse points of views will not be tolerated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

If Garland were a decent human being, he would announce that he is not interested in ascending to the SCOTUS at this stage and for the media and Schumer to please refrain from touting him as a candidate. (But he’s not, so he won’t).


24 posted on 07/05/2018 12:09:14 PM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I trust the President will give it all the consideration his suggestion merits.


25 posted on 07/05/2018 12:09:23 PM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

And who sez ‘ol Chuck U Schumer doesn’t have a sense of humor


26 posted on 07/05/2018 12:10:31 PM PDT by Godzilla ( I just love the smell of COVFEFE in the morning . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The president only gave Schmucky five minutes of his valuable time. This is desperation when Schmuck suggests the president nominate the lefty hack The One tried to get on the Court.


27 posted on 07/05/2018 12:10:37 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tje

I trust the President has already given it all the consideration his suggestion merits.


28 posted on 07/05/2018 12:10:42 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Schumer: “And if you can’t go with Garland, I’m willing to settle for Eric Holder.”

"Ok, your exaggerated laughter was not necessary! So, how about, Loretta Lynch, then?" Schit-mer asked.
29 posted on 07/05/2018 12:11:32 PM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is tolerance; diverse points of views will not be tolerated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kelyan

Yep, because they’d do the same, right? Pick a conservative judge to unify the country.


30 posted on 07/05/2018 12:12:14 PM PDT by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: detective

I can’t believe Chucky has the gall to dig this name back up. What a Schmuck.


31 posted on 07/05/2018 12:12:54 PM PDT by ProudDeplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Got news for you.....Chuck Schumer is already being ignored...so, is Nancy Pelosi, so, is the entire Democrat Party.

If the Democrats think it is bad now...just wait until the on coming political slaughter that will befall the Democrat Party on election day this year, occurs.

Go, Trump, Go, MAGA!!!!


32 posted on 07/05/2018 12:15:12 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

You lost, Putz.


33 posted on 07/05/2018 12:15:36 PM PDT by gogeo (No justice, no peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

[ Schumer urges Trump to tap Merrick Garland for Supreme Court]

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

(ow, my side)

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!


34 posted on 07/05/2018 12:17:45 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Yeah, that'll work Chucky.

Instead of President Trump selecting his own candidate, the Left wants him to pick their guy.

Why would Trump even consider electing the Resistance's liberal candidate?

The Left loses an election and they still think they are calling the shots.

35 posted on 07/05/2018 12:18:32 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Schumer urges Trump to tap Merrick Garland for Supreme Court

_____________________________________________________

Every day a new reason to belly-laugh.


36 posted on 07/05/2018 12:18:38 PM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

37 posted on 07/05/2018 12:19:13 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: detective

I urge Chuckles to ingest excrement


38 posted on 07/05/2018 12:19:48 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Exactly!

I’m joining her to LMAO.


39 posted on 07/05/2018 12:20:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: detective
Some worthwhile thoughts for persons not blinded by the dogma of Progressivism:
"'The premises of authoritarian collectivism,' Lippmann wrote in The Good Society, 'have become the working beliefs, the self-evident assumptions, the unquestioned axioms, not only of all the revolutionary regimes, but of nearly every effort which lays claim to being enlightened, humane, and progressive… Throughout the world, in the name of progress, men who call themselves communists, socialists, fascists, nationalists, progressives, and even liberals, are unanimous in holding that government with its instruments of coercion must, by commanding the people how they shall live, direct the course of civilization and fix the shape of things to come.'” - Walter Lippman

"Such times of mental and spiritual flux as we are now experiencing have led, at certain other points in American history, not into collectivism and disappointment but into what Lincoln called 'a new birth of freedom' for 'this nation, under God.' That is the future we can have, once we understand that ideas have consequences*, for no one and nothing can deprive us of the individual freedom to choose our own ideas and the individual courage to act upon those ideas at whatever price. If enough of us are awake to that freedom and alive with that courage, noble myths and grand realities must surely be the consequence." - George Roche, in The American Collectivist Myth: Its Roots, Its Results, Its Downfall

"The really satisfying part of the whole experience of Western civilization, and specifically the Judaeo-Christian ethic, is that you are building something that you are handing down to those who come after. You are putting more in than you are taking out. That used to be what was so fine about this country. It is what could be so fine about this country again. We have before us the most enormous intellectual opportunity to change the course of our social order, and with that perhaps the course of the world. We have it right in our hands to do something about it." - George Roche, in The American Collectivist Myth: Its Roots, Its Results, Its Downfall

*Ira Weaver


40 posted on 07/05/2018 12:21:43 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson