Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Klayman Supports Barrett for SCOTUS Seat, Says Democrats Are "Trying to Smear Her"
1 posted on 07/04/2018 1:45:54 AM PDT by a little elbow grease
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: a little elbow grease

If their worst smear is “she’s a Catholic”, this could be entertaining.


3 posted on 07/04/2018 2:07:01 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

Chicago Circuit Court Judge Amy Coney Barrett

/

Chicago? Oh hell to the NO NO NO. You don’t get anywhere in Chicago if you’re not some wacka doodle leftwinger on at least a few issues.


4 posted on 07/04/2018 2:09:23 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease
It will be a full court press against her this time.

Every liberal minority former student will be lying about her under oath:

"...I heard her in the cafeteria..."

"...i heard her in the ladies room...."

There will be no end to it. We won't see another judicial confirmation for months.

They only brought in one black woman to lie about Clarence Thomas and nearly torpedoed his nomination. This time the hallways will be full of them.

DemonRats lie for a living; it's what they do.

6 posted on 07/04/2018 2:11:26 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

“She’s obviously a woman. That’s good.”

Excellent and profound statement.


7 posted on 07/04/2018 2:13:40 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

The Democrats are smearing everyone!


10 posted on 07/04/2018 2:32:51 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

NWOSCOTUS.


12 posted on 07/04/2018 2:40:28 AM PDT by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

The Democrats’ big issue is the abortion and legal-person-at-conception position. Feminism, women’s sexual liberation, the destruction of traditional family culture and fatherlessness have moved far away from that position over the past few decades.

That will draw some quieter criticism from most Republicans and their constituents, too. Abortions are very common among female university students—even Catholic ones (student health center stats in universities in Catholic communities in the 1980s). “We’ve come a long way, baby” (re. old TV advertisement using feminism as a hook).

There’s also Barrett’s written opinion on Catholic judges recusing themselves from death penalty cases.

Catholic Judges in Capital Cases [Information in re. Amy Coney Barrett]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3667995/posts


13 posted on 07/04/2018 2:54:25 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

Some of them may be posting on this forum.


14 posted on 07/04/2018 3:02:28 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

His reasoning is kind of shallow.


16 posted on 07/04/2018 3:08:42 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease
These people have all been interviewed before by the President when Gorsuch was in the mix. His second choice last time was (supposedly) Hardman.

Poor Schumer...Dems must be really p***** cuz if he hadn't filibustered Gorsuch, they'd still have the super majority card to play.

18 posted on 07/04/2018 3:13:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease
With all of the personal attacks now being generated by the socialists/communist thugs against anyone in a position of policy or decisional responsibility within the Trump administration, and eventually due to spill over into the general population against those of us who espouse conservatism or who can be identified as having voted for Trump, I wouldn't be surprised if Barrett respectfully declines the nomination.

This has happened before IIRC re the CIA chief's controversial nomination. Even though she reluctantly agreed to go through the ordeal. Don't forget what the Senate and Joe Biden put Clarence Thomas through lo those many years ago. Racist Biden cut his senatorial teeth on Thomas. Just saying.

It's gotten a lot worse now and the new civil unrest is going to have a chilling effect on Trump nominees unless and until we see some pushback, which we haven't. Seriously. Am scheduled to work as a polling inspector for the Primary in August, and the General in November here in Florida, and thinking it's going to get pretty nasty at the voting booths.

19 posted on 07/04/2018 3:14:40 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

I don’t understand why some of the geriatrics like Ginsburg are sticking in there. Anyone with half a brain could see there’s a very good chance that Trump will be re-elected - do they really hope to stick it out until 2024, and the hopes that a Democrat will be elected THEN who can pick their replacement? Ruth would be 91! Are their egos really THAT big?


20 posted on 07/04/2018 3:20:38 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

The preemptive smear campaign says they’re scared sh**less of this woman. If they really thought they could sink her, they’d have waited until after her nomination to do so, so there would be time to nominate another judge before the midterms. If Schumer himself is already unloading now, it seems to me it’s a sign they don’t think they have enough ammo against her to stop her after the nomination.


24 posted on 07/04/2018 3:51:25 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

“Politically it’s going to be hard for the Democrats to have much objection to her.”

WRONG! Democraps are genetically incapable of not objecting to anything proposed or said by Trump. Their psychotic rage prevents them from grasping the obvious, massive hypocrisy of their objections.

What a Barrett nomination would do is make it easy for conservatives to expose liberal duplicity and to laugh at them as their heads explode.


26 posted on 07/04/2018 4:17:38 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

If the Dems spend another week screaming about her they’ll have a hard time cranking up the outrage all over again for Thapar or Kethledge.


31 posted on 07/04/2018 4:33:59 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

The Dems hate Catholics and conservative women.


33 posted on 07/04/2018 4:58:39 AM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

No kidding Larry.


34 posted on 07/04/2018 5:20:11 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine. #FreeTommy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

Stay clear of Barrett. A law professor at Notre Dame, a very liberal college that even covered religious statues to please Obama. Little or no record of her decisions from the bench. Did she go to Haiti to adopt kids to enhance her resume’? What’s wrong with adopting poor suffering American kids? Where will she stand om affirmative action, immigration,death penalty, etc.? We all know where the Catholic Church stands.


35 posted on 07/04/2018 5:21:33 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

I like Klayman a lot but I think he is being naïve on this point. The democrats will make up something to smear her. It’s absolutely guaranteed.


44 posted on 07/04/2018 6:47:27 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a little elbow grease

A good clue as to her worth can be judged by how much the Democrats try to smear her. She sounds like a good choice.


48 posted on 07/04/2018 7:48:14 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson