Posted on 06/24/2018 10:42:12 AM PDT by Mariner
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Sunday that people who enter the United States illegally should be sent back to where they came from immediately without any judicial process.
Facing a public outcry and pressure even from within his Republican Party, Trump last week reversed his policy of separating migrant children from their parents at the border so the adults could be detained and prosecuted, a process that typically takes months.
Since buckling on the issue on Wednesday, Trump has redoubled his criticism of U.S. immigration laws on Twitter and in speeches where he likened illegal immigrants to invaders trying to "break into" the country.
"We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came. Our system is a mockery to good immigration policy and Law and Order. Most children come without parents," Trump said Sunday on Twitter.
(Excerpt) Read more at ca.news.yahoo.com ...
True, that.
I believe it would be better to build Gitmo-like facilities at the border. The incarceration buildings would then serve as a wall. A continuous line of fortified barracks at the USA-Mexico border. Illegals in our country would be sent there. Illegals coming in would be housed there (until the stupid laws are fixed). When their hearing/stay is complete (until the laws are fixed), kick them out into the Mexico side. We would save tons of money doing this. Build prisons as the wall!
When the hell did this become President Trumps policy? This is laws that have been on the books for 30 years or more.
Absolutely! That’s the point of the wall. Immediate turn back.
“President Donald Trump said on Sunday that people who enter the United States illegally should be sent back to where they came from immediately without any judicial process.”
Rooters is trying to make this sound controversial. But by what logic should a person be able to stay in our country awaiting a day in court merely because they climbed a border fence or waded the Rio Grande?
Too bad Reuters writers never actually had a hard course in college.
Starting with looking up the word “illegal”.
Any way we can send the reporters to another country too?
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Fly them to the most southern point of the Central American shithole that they came from, and drop 'em.
Furthermore, it's time to spread some pesos around the Mexican military, peel them away from the cartels, explain how that's small coin compared to what they could make if they looked to Egypt as a governing model.
Love it!
We should stop using the word “immigrant”. They aren’t immigrants. They aren’t illegal immigrants. They are illegal border crashers. They are invading armies or gangs.
Great.
Whoa..AWESOME
Could not have said it better myself.
Exactly right. Do it that way.
If someone breaks into my home I don’t have to hire a lawyer and go to court to get them out.
This should be the same. We don’t need to spend $100,000 per illegal to get them out. Buy them a first class one way ticket home and save over $99,000 dollars.
I swear - sometimes I think I've got a telepathic connection to the President. I was thinking that very thought last night.
He's right again, of course. Illegal aliens within our borders aren't entitled to any due process, under our laws or our Constitution.
About the most they should expect from us, is mercy and humane treatment, when we arrest, then boot them out of the country.
I am so with Trump on this. Arrest and deport on contact with law enforcement, or other civil authorities.
If they're discovered in the country after having been deported, jail them in prison for five years, minimum.
Rinse and repeat as needed, until they get the message.
You won't even need a wall to keep them out.
No way, Jose.
You charge them with a crime, and you've automatically entered them into our justice system, which means extending them Due Process and rights of all kinds.
That plays right into the hands of the left, who know we can't squeeze 40 million illegals through that bottleneck.
Post of the thread, IMO. Of course - it’s ALWAYS been the policy. We live in truly insane, frightening times.
If the illegal entrant was across that line, further into the interior, then there had to be a process before being kicked back out.
Anyone else recall something like that? If so, what happened to that?
Have a DMZ where it is a buffer zone and if your caught in the zone no courts just deported!
I prefer MA DEUCE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.