Breaking: Judge Ellis May Side with Manafort Against Dirty Cop Robert Mueller and Special Counsel

Gateway Pundit ^ | June 11, 2018 | Jim Hoft

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

FOX News attorney Gregg Jarrett told Lou Dobbs on Monday that Judge Ellis may still side with Paul Manafort in his case against Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the DOJ.

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

Let's wish Paul Manafort luck. If it wasn't for him securing delegates, Trump might not be president right now.

[Paladin2]

A leak?

[Alberta's Child]

Judge Ellis May Side with Manafort Against Dirty Cop Robert Mueller and Special Counsel

This is breaking news? Please.

[CaptainK]

Or may not.

[Proud White Trump Supporter]

According to the Gateway Pundit, a prestigious member of the White House Press Pool, it is Breaking

[onyx]

PRAYERS UP!

[tennmountainman]

May side is not breaking news.
If and when the Judge sides with Manifort,
that will be breaking news.

[RoseofTexas]

My skepticism radar is in full mode!! But hopefully the judge WILL rule in Flynn favor...hopefully!!😏

[b4me]

This isn’t news, it’s the attny’s opinion that it’s a possibility.

Surprise! It’s been a possibility since this whole mueller/manafort thing started it’s nothing new.

[Fido969]

Manafort has two cases, this judge is favorable, and has cautioned Mueller. There another case in front of a leftie judge who has ruled against Manafort.

[Williams]

That’s an opinion not a news event.

[Paladin2]

Were there actions today at the court?

Filings?

Orders published?

Judge giving interviews?

Mueller leaking?

More SWATing?

[G Larry]

Judge Ellis May?

Did she show up to court in a Red Dodge?

[tennmountainman]

I don’t think so.
The Judge is still considering his ruling.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

A BREAKING NEWS that has the word MAY is clickbait.

[bray]

This would be YUGE!

[Paladin2]

Then a form of benign Fake News.

[llevrok]

If and when the Judge sides with Manifort, that will be breaking news.

Agree. Got to see it to believe it, in these days of "news".

[Revel]

There is that Jim Hoft again. I would take this with a grain of salt.

[canuck_conservative]

The thing is, Muller’s scope is supposed to be limited to ONLY what happened during the 2015-16 campaign.

All the charges against Manafort relate to stuff he did back in 2013 with Ukraine, which is obviously well outside Mueller’s legal scope. (They’re trying to pressure him, obviously.)

Yes there’s the perjury trap he walked into, but if the case was properly based on technical merits, Manafort should never have been questioned in the first place, so the perjury trap should never have happened.

That’s his beef, and an honest judge could very well see it that way too.