Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/08/2018 1:22:58 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

Of course more grant money will be needed.


2 posted on 06/08/2018 1:25:09 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Don’t take it all. Plants and crops need CO2 to live.


3 posted on 06/08/2018 1:25:16 PM PDT by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

LOL....”scientists”.....my ass.

No way, no how....


4 posted on 06/08/2018 1:26:48 PM PDT by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“PERHAPS give our planet a second chance” - you gotta love just how bought in and terrorized these people a Newsweak are.


6 posted on 06/08/2018 1:27:05 PM PDT by monkeybrau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

7 posted on 06/08/2018 1:27:31 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (President Trump divides Americans . . . from anti-Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Don’t the plants need the CO2? insanity is strong with them.


8 posted on 06/08/2018 1:27:32 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

CO2 is but a tiny fraction of a small percent of trace gases in the atmosphere, necessary for plant life.

Take it out, and plant life on the planet goes extinct - but humans go extinct first due to lost food sources. Bad idea - we need CO2 to exist. People don’t understand that 99 percent of the atmosphere is not trace gases. And CO2 is a tiny fraction of that remaining 1 percent.


10 posted on 06/08/2018 1:29:46 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Carbon dioxide is a non-flammable gas. It is the product of combustion itself. So even if you recover it, it cant become fuel with the addition of something else. It can only be separated to use as an oxidizer.

Where do these so called scientists of today come from that think they can take a penny and make a dollar from it without putting in the remaining 99 cents?


11 posted on 06/08/2018 1:30:35 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Carbon dioxide is a non-flammable gas. It is the product of combustion itself. So even if you recover it, it cant become fuel with the addition of something else. It can only be separated to use as an oxidizer.

Where do these so called scientists of today come from that think they can take a penny and make a dollar from it without putting in the remaining 99 cents?


12 posted on 06/08/2018 1:30:35 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
***WARNING***

Newsweek (Newswreck) - Dishonored in Trump's 2017 Top Ten First Annual Fake News Winners AKA Among the Top Ten Biggest Liars of the Lying Leftist Media

Don’t believe these Lying Leftist Media outlets that proved themselves during the 2016 campaign to be operatives of the DNC and intentional liars. They are presumed to be lying and we should presume what they publish is a lie. The presumption can only be rebutted with the outlet providing clear and convincing evidence they are not lying.

If this story is true and has some redeeming value, at least get the story from a reasonably reliable source, not from a known Lying Leftist operative posing as a “news” organization. You’ve done the Patriotic Right a service. Much better than the mindless repetition of lying sources and their lying headlines.

14 posted on 06/08/2018 1:30:58 PM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Or this!


16 posted on 06/08/2018 1:33:27 PM PDT by HombreSecreto (Iron Maiden? EXCELLENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

With cheap enough energy you can recycle anything.


18 posted on 06/08/2018 1:33:56 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

they invented wood?..................


21 posted on 06/08/2018 1:34:20 PM PDT by Red Badger (When Obama and VJ go to prison for treason, will Roseanne get her show back?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well, aside from the fact that I think “global warming” is a hoax (historically, there have always been warm periods and cool periods), I think this is a good idea.

The panicked idea that we should simply shut down human life on this planet is ridiculous. With our scientific capacities, we should be able to find a solution.

The problem is that many people, mostly the left, won’t want it because they want to keep the hysteria going. Think how many millions Al Gore has made on it...


22 posted on 06/08/2018 1:34:28 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Scientists Propose Plan to Suck CO2 Greenhouse Gas From Air, Turn Into Fuel

We already have such things. They're called trees.

24 posted on 06/08/2018 1:34:40 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

My grandfather grew stands of timber on his farm consuming lots of carbon dioxide , and he burned deadfall in the basement furnace to heat the farmhouse.

Evidently he was a scientist half a century ahead of his time...


25 posted on 06/08/2018 1:34:55 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It is currently possible to extract CO2 from the air, but the process is expensive. According to the paper, the new machine may be able to do so at a reduced price: $94 to $232 per ton of CO2 from the atmosphere.

...

That’s a pretty big spread, and they should keep their mouths shut until they actually do it. Otherwise, it looks like a scam.


26 posted on 06/08/2018 1:36:11 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

28 posted on 06/08/2018 1:38:59 PM PDT by BBell (not drinking, just a smart a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

so, at $200/ton how many billons of trillions of dollars will it take to “capture” enough CO2 to reduce the atmospheric levels by even 1 part per million, and what is the carbon cost to build enough “capture” factories to do that?


30 posted on 06/08/2018 1:39:20 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Scientists Propose Plan to Suck CO2 Greenhouse Gas money From Air your wallet
35 posted on 06/08/2018 1:43:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson