Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New law limits toilet flushes, showers in California
AZfamily.com ^ | June 2, 2018 | Adam McDonald

Posted on 06/05/2018 3:32:34 PM PDT by Hadean

(Meredith/CBS13) – A new law passed in California will soon limit the number of gallons of water a person is allowed to use per day.

By 2022, residents in California will be limited to 55 gallons per person, per day. In 2013, the number of gallons used is expected to fall to 50.

According to CBS13, California is the first state across the country to institute tough, water-efficiency standards like this.

“With a child and every day having to wash clothes, that’s not feasible. That’s my opinion,” Tanya Allen, the mother of a -four-year-old, told CBS13. “But I get it and I understand that we’re trying to preserve. But 55 gallons a day?”

How many gallons?!

With the newly passed law, many people are asking if 55 gallons a day is enough. CBS13 broke down just how much water an average home uses:

An eight-minute shower uses about 17 gallons of water. One load of laundry uses about 40. Taking a bath can use anywhere between 80 and 100 gallons of water.

“I think the average new home is 35 gallons per person, per day, so we are not talking emergency conservation here,” Chair of the State Water Resources Control Board Felicia Marcus told CBS13.

Ways to cut back

One solution to the water problem is retrofitting homes with more efficient water fixtures, which would help in cutting back water usage. Another solution is for officials to fix leaks and educate residents.

“We lose up to 30 percent of urban water just to leaks in the system,” Greg Bundesen, who works with the Sacramento Suburban Water District, said. “Some people may not be aware that you’re going to use a lot more water in a bath. It’s our job to make sure they’re informed.”

The new law also requires water districts to perform tests on their water supply and systems to make sure they aren’t too stressed.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; fakenews; flushnazi; libtardutopia; noflushesforyou; postedseveraltimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Hadean

Too many illegal aliens for urban planning.


61 posted on 06/05/2018 4:28:15 PM PDT by donna (The California Sanctuary State is the latest method for trapping and trading slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

I’m going to have to move near a sorority and offer to let some of the pretty young co-eds save water by joining me in the shower.

{{{kidding!}}}


62 posted on 06/05/2018 4:31:03 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Sessions couldn't find his own ass if Al Franken was grabbing it at the time ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

Being that they’re in a DESERT that makes sense. I grew up in Southern California. The entire state is not a desert.


63 posted on 06/05/2018 4:32:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

They lose 30% to leaks?? That’s absurd.


64 posted on 06/05/2018 4:32:23 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

I think you just won the internet.


65 posted on 06/05/2018 4:33:10 PM PDT by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Great movie.


66 posted on 06/05/2018 4:33:45 PM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Being that they’re in a DESERT that makes sense.”

Dallas in not is a DESERT and Dallas has Watering Restrictions.


67 posted on 06/05/2018 4:35:19 PM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
1923_BC4_F_C5_C2_4_C77_A53_D_229_D786_A39_F5
68 posted on 06/05/2018 4:36:40 PM PDT by CaliforniaCraftBeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I know the media is fake and full of lies but, CBS is running a scam, lies, clickbait?
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/05/31/california-water-limits/#.WxXCC4Y10ko.twitter


69 posted on 06/05/2018 4:39:40 PM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (I'm not tired of Winning yet! Please, continue on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Do like in Australia, catchment tanks.
But nope then the democrats will throw a fit cause its from the sky.
Thank god i escaped Ca back in 1992.


70 posted on 06/05/2018 4:40:14 PM PDT by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Sell California to France. The cheese eating surrender monkeys would love a state that doesn’t shower.


71 posted on 06/05/2018 4:40:23 PM PDT by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
You try to reduce water usage by doing your business outside and they roust you out!

Sheesh, you try to help the environment and you get evicted. Why can't they make up their minds?

72 posted on 06/05/2018 4:41:44 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

Have you checked out Assembly Bill 1668 and Senate Bill 606? It was approved by Governor Brown May 31, 2018 and filed with Secretary of State May 31, 2018.

I haven’t read them myself, but this information was in the comments to the article. Let us know what you find out.


73 posted on 06/05/2018 4:45:05 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

I live in Euless and there are no restrictions here whatsoever to my knowledge. We’re the 14th fastest growing city in the United States.


74 posted on 06/05/2018 4:46:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

The legislation is rather clear.

The restrictions are on the water districts, not the consumer.

If you want to get fined for watering your lawn, you should move to Texas, where you will be fined.


75 posted on 06/05/2018 4:47:18 PM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave2

Absolutely correct.

And six months from now, when the tube is full of stories and pics of Californians up to their eyeballs with floodwaters, you won’t see me crying about it.


76 posted on 06/05/2018 4:49:54 PM PDT by djf ("She wore a raspberry beret, the kind you find in a second hand store..." - Prince)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

If you go to Mexico, don`t drink the water coz it ain`t safe.

If you go to California, don`t drink the water coz there ain`t none.


77 posted on 06/05/2018 4:51:11 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 ((((("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue
From AB 1668, Chapter 15, Section "Legislative Counsel's Digest":
The bill, until January 1, 2025, would establish 55 gallons per capita daily as the standard for indoor residential water use, beginning January 1, 2025, would establish the greater of 52.5 gallons per capita daily or a standard recommended by the department and the board as the standard for indoor residential water use, and beginning January 1, 2030, would establish the greater of 50 gallons per capita daily or a standard recommended by the department and the board as the standard for indoor residential water use. The bill would impose civil liability for a violation of an order or regulation issued pursuant to these provisions, as specified.
Seems rather clear to me. Please explain why you say this newly passed law does not do what it plainly says. Eagerly awaiting your elucidation.
78 posted on 06/05/2018 4:52:09 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

And you think those restrictions on the water districts won’t be passed down to the consumer?


79 posted on 06/05/2018 4:53:21 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

The law does not limit the a residential consumer’s water usage.

But rather sets limits on and goals for water districts.

Unlike in Texas, where you get fined for watering off schedule.


80 posted on 06/05/2018 4:55:24 PM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson