Posted on 05/18/2018 7:24:22 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) warned Republican lawmakers on Friday not to expose the identity of top-secret FBI informant, saying that to do so would be "irresponsible" and potentially illegal.
"It would be at best irresponsible, and at worst potentially illegal, for members of Congress to use their positions to learn the identity of an FBI source for the purpose of undermining the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in our election," Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.
"Anyone who is entrusted with our nations highest secrets should act with the gravity and seriousness of purpose that knowledge deserves," he added.
Etc...
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
What is Warner hiding?
Who and what is he protecting?
Dems all CONCERNED about the LAW, huh..?
What a GD laugh.
Stuff it, commie Warner!
"We all, like...concerned about THE LAW an' sh*t..! Nome sayin'..?"
Jeff Sessions?
Whoever the informant was, the Dems are really worked up about the person getting exposed. Must be political dynamite.
Oh for crying out loud. If I know what it is, it’s not such a secret.
Lovely. So when will Sen Warner rebuke his Dem colleague Jay Rockefeller for near-constant leaks in an attempt to undermine GW Bush and various military actions? Rockefeller delivered more paper than the US Mail during those years.
Bomber must right over the target..
Like Obama and Clinton among so many other Democrats? Like the FBI, CIA and State Departments in Democrat Administrations? This guy is an a** Clown and punk. Democrats make me sick.
LOL.
We know he is a plant. But it may be the other plant.
“Jeff Sessions?”
It would not be surprising..
Blow it our ur ass Warner-—sheesh, enough already. Lets get CW 2 rolling..I am not getting any younger and do want to kick some Liberal butt while I am still physically able.
Look for the dems to leak the name.
Yep.
Who does the FBI work for?
“Who does the FBI work for?”
Ultimately, themselves..
That's going to be done under a court order -- probably MULTIPLE court orders -- from a judge presiding over the cases Mueller's team of misfit lawyers are prosecuting.
The defendants in these cases have the right to see this evidence, and to potentially call this source as a witness.
It's actually intriguing to see how this is all playing out. Devin Nunes and his committee aren't doing this to reveal the source. They're doing this to inform the defense attorneys in those various cases that this source exists.
......or all the illegal actions carried out by the scum leading the FBI and heading the CIA during Brennan’s dirty operations, and Hillary’s reckless treatment of classified information. The Dems really are scared....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.