Joe Biden Boasts of Keeping 'Brilliant Conservative' Robert Bork Off Supreme Court

Newsbusters.org ^ | | April 7, 2018 9:30 EDT | By Jack Coleman

[Dalberg-Acton]

Good find.

[ryderann]

Did Biden threaten to feel up somebody?

[Vaquero]

“Plugs” / “steel plate” Biden is a dooosh and a scumbag.

Stand up chuck.

[BradyLS]

Who was Biden pawing when he wasn’t talking?

[Huskrrrr]

You’re not worthy to shine his shoes, Plugs.

[jeffersondem]

“Joe Biden Boasts of Keeping ‘Brilliant Conservative’ Robert Bork Off Supreme Court”

Bork did not believe the second amendment protected private gun ownership. Yes, you read that right.

The nation and the constitution dodged a bullet when Bork was defeated.

And no, I don't like Biden.

[Carl Vehse]

What?!?

It’s more likely Robert Bork didn’t have any young daughters that Pedophilebiden could fondle?

[Candor7]

Yep! Joe “plugs” Biden will make a fine president , he earned his stripes by having a motorcade that had to drive so fast to avoid his enemies, that he broke the records for the number of pedestrians his motorcade ran over.

[Flaming Conservative]

Liberals have no shame. They are PROUD of their misdeeds.

[morphing libertarian]

wants to break Clinton’s record as groper-in-chief

[Doogle]

...a big mouth often cause’s one to choke....(seal team 6)

[Alberta's Child]

I read an article a few years ago that claimed the GOP was complicit in throwing Bork under the bus. There was apparently a lot of resentment over his role in the “Saturday Night Massacre” back in the Nixon days.

[Bonemaker]

“Joe Biden Boasts of Keeping ‘Brilliant Conservative’ Robert Bork Off Supreme Court”

The joke is on you dumshit. Biden did us a favor and screwed his party...Bork was an enemy of the second amendment! Hahahahaha!

[jeffersondem]

During Bork's confirmation hearing I was a big fan of his. I did not learn until much later Bork didn't understand the purpose of the second amendment. He would have been a terrible justice on the supreme court - another Earl Warren.

Said Bork: “National Rifle Association is always arguing that the Second Amendment determines the right to bear arms. But I think it really is the people's right to bear arms in a militia. The NRA thinks it protects their right to have Teflon-coated bullets. But that's not the original understanding.”

That statement, unfortunately for Bork's reputation, is not a one-off.

[StAnDeliver]

When Slow Joe gets the Dem nom in 2020, it will be after consolidating his win a la Hillary after a BRUISING primary fight -- where the progressive won't be some old fart fossil but a Moochelle stand-in: a tempermental, tempestuous, wretched ratchet from Kali named Karamela.

Joe will be forced to take Karamela on the ticket as VP; meanwhile Our Beloved President will frame the debate portraying Joe as Trump's unsuccessful, unloved, oxygen-deprived-at-birth older brother. And it will stick.

[Iron Munro]

The ‘Borking’ of Judge Robert Bork.

One of the most egregious abuses of power ever seen in Washington until the advent of the Clinton and Obama administrations.

[Blue Collar Christian]

The evil ones do evil things because they are evil.

It’s their identity. To them, evil is a good thing.

[Louis Foxwell]

But I think it really is the people's right to bear arms in a militia. The stupidity of this statement is obvious. Is it a right that requires protection for soldiers to carry firearms in war? Under what circumstances would a militia not be armed?

[Trumpisourlastchance]

And tens of millions probably died as a result.