NO FUNDING FOR Planned Parenthood. And we WILL get the wall.

All Aboard the Omnibus, Isaac Green ^ | 3/25/18 | American Dream 246

[American Dream 246]

Please forgive my english .. I am one who was disgusted yesterday with that omnibus bill but according to Isaac Green, who DID read the bill, a lot of good news in there. He gives details and parts of the bill that says that here is NO funding for ABORTION - NO ABORTION can be financed by government money!!! Also here is 80 Billions for the army engineers that is funded so it can be used to build the wall.

And so much more. Please listen to this video. Everything Isaac Green says is highighted on the right side of the screen: the part of the omnibus bill he is talking about.

If Isaac is correct then the democrats are more than stupid to think they got a great deal!! But we need to pass the word so all those who are giving up on President Trump should be aware that Trump may be ever smarter than we ever thought!

Let's pray we are right - MAGA!

[greeneyes]

Oh quit your whining - you’ve already wasted too much time, energy, and bandwidth.

For the record, I didn’t start this. All I did was post to Metmom - Amen and thanks for posting that(a nifty pic JMHO).

Then I get paragraphs of justifications blah blah blah from you. Jeez Louise.

SUCK IT UP BUTTERCUP. AMEN!!!!! Now I’m done.

[a little elbow grease]

Laz

Save it.............

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Trump giving $500 Million to Planned Parenthood for non-abortion services is like pouring water into the other side of a bucket.

Well, has he been authorized to release it, or commanded to release it?

[morphing libertarian]

if we fund half of planned parenthood they will take it for other things including lawyers to lobby congress and administrative costs and use state and private funds to commit murder and sell body parts. This celebration over trumps biggest mistake is BS.

[UnwashedPeasant]

"Well, has he been authorized to release it, or commanded to release it?"

Congress requested it. Trump approved it.

[Guenevere]

YES!....YES!....YES!

THAT’S MY PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!

[a little elbow grease]

Would have the 'vain' Isaac Newton been permitted to place his laws of physics in "Breaking News" if FR were around back then?

Some things are "breaking news" even when they seem to be "vain"/ a vanity.

[Lazamataz]

See, this is why hypotheticals are not allowed in court. You can stretch such an item to absurd limits.

An opinion-vanity (or an interpretation-vanity of a piece of legislation) is not Breaking News.

If you personally witness a nuclear explosion over North Korea, and are the first person to post the story, that would be breaking news.

If, however, you have an opinion about nuclear weapons, or an interpretation of nuclear physics text, that is NOT Breaking News.

[a little elbow grease]

You make a good point.

Now ...... may I add just for you?

___________