Posted on 01/21/2018 11:29:43 AM PST by MNDude
r/CBTS_Stream OMG! Q new post! u/kazzieau Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/22/18 (Mon) 05:06:20 No.47
Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
Memo shifts narrative. Memo reinstates SESSIONS' authority re: Russia/ALL. Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels. Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized INTEL community to ensure D victory [+insurance]. Memo factually demonstrates 'knowingly false intel' provided to FISA Judges to obtain warrant(s). THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE.
[The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America]
Hussein [8]
Install rogue_ops
Leak C-intel/Mil assets
Cut funding to Mil
Command away from generals
Launch 'good guy' takedown (internal remove) - Valerie Jarrett (sniffer)
SAP sell-off
Snowden open source Prism/Keyscore (catastrophic to US Mil v. bad actors (WW) +Clowns/-No Such Agency)
Target/weaken conservative base (IRS/MSM)
Open border (flood illegals: D win) ISIS/MS13 fund/install (fear, targeting/removal, domestic-assets etc.)
Blind-eye NK [nuke build]
[Clas-1, 2, 3]
Blind-eye Iran [fund and supply]
Blind-eye [CLAS 23-41]
Stage SC [AS [187]]
U1 fund/supply IRAN/NK [+reduce US capacity]
KILL NASA (prevent space domination/allow bad actors to take down MIL SATs/WW secure comms/install WMDs) - RISK OF EMP SPACE ORIG (HELPLESS)
[CLAS 1-99]
HRC [8] WWIII [death & weapons real/WAR FAKE & CONTROLLED][population growth control/pocket billions]
Eliminate final rogue_ops within Gov't/MIL
KILL economy [starve/need/enslave]
Open borders
Revise Constitution
Ban sale of firearms (2nd amen removal)
Install 'on team' SC justices> legal win(s) across spectrum of challengers (AS 187)
Removal of electoral college [pop vote easier manipulation/illegal votes/Soros machines]
Limit/remove funding of MIL
Closure of US MIL installations WW [Germany 1st]
Destruction of opposing MSM/other news outlets (censoring), CLAS 1-59
[]
Pure EVIL.
Narrative intercept [4am].
Sessions/Nunes Russian OPS.
Repub distortion of facts to remove Mueller.[POTUS free pass].
Shutdown Primary Reasons.
Distract.
Weaken military assets.
Inc illegal votes.
Black voters abandoning.
"Keep them starved"
"Keep them blind"
"Keep them stupid"
HRC March 13, 2013 [intercept].
The Great Awakening.
Fight, Fight, Fight.
Q
see #674
Stated wonderfully, thank you.
You are linking an anon linking to a twitter page of Qanon who is not Q.
My IQ is probably middle high for genius levels. However, Qx's is 190 or so.
Qx has, because of his serious degree of attachment disorder, tended to discount his own IQ most of his life.
For one, he's always known that high IQ people can still do really dumb things--as he has proven himself too often in his life.
Anyway--he's tended to be self-deprecating about it--even to himself when alone.
He has enjoyed the ability it has afforded him to take in vast amounts of information on a huge diversity of topics and make fairly quick sense of it. But he's oddly wrongly assumed most people could do that almost as well as he could--in spite of endless years of proof that they can't.
He also has, for a man, a very high degree of intuitive assessment skills--data collection and interpretation.
Those two together--very high IQ and high intuitive skills have really been great assets in counseling and teaching. He achieved a lot in both settings in record time that even his supervisors were known to marvel at.
So here we are considering Q-anon.
Qx is often quite torn. His IQ has tended to be the source of a kind of aversion--i.e. people who were therefore a bit afraid of Qx, his IQ or insecure around him when talking about anything very complex or substantive.
That has only intensified Qx's sense of being quite isolated most of his life. He credits me with helping relieve him of a lot of that sense of isolation. PTL for that.
He loves to dialogue with folks--often even those who disagree with him--as long as they can be fair-minded and mutually respectful. But few rise to the occasion.
Instead, a lot of contrarian naysayers feel like they have to joust with him. They seem to fit Dr Jordan Peterson's (youtube) assertions about IF someone is DISAGREEABLE, then they WANT to WIN A COMPETITION ... and behave like clueless asinine bulldog's accordingly.
Qx wants dialogue, the iron sharpening iron exchanges that leave both more enlightened and better somehow.
But with such contrarians, he, (AND I) tend to feel that no amount of proof is ever adequate. So why try.
Besides that, a lot of what Qx gains in terms of insight involves his very high IQ married to his very high intuitive stuff. It's not fool proof but it's WAY above average in accuracy. His 71 years have simply proven that over and over.
He has ended up feeling like (as much as he hates to think that way) that a lot of folks are just not up to the challenge presented by how Qx arrives at his conclusions. And no amount of explanation will ever satisfy them.
At this point, he's mostly burned out on trying. And, I confess, I feel increasingly similarly.
I came up with a sentence that tends to describe what I've observed with him repeatedly: "They flunked the Quix test."
Therefore what, I don't know. But I figured somehow, you'd understand. And that would bless both of us just now.
I think we both are increasingly weary of trying to joust meaningfully with chihuahua's. We don't wish to demean anyone--we're just not on the same wave-length--or some such.
And translating between the two very different constructions on reality has become a very tiresome chore that is no longer much fun for either of us.
Sigh.
Thanks for listening.
Could be. Qx doesn’t think so. He sees Goudy as the real deal. But there are some puzzlements—e.g. his respect for Sessions etc. Thanks.
EM is musk. ES is schmidt.
It seems in those 600+ posts that there are at least 3 aggressive posters desperate to disprove Q and to insult posters who find Q enlightening. That type of desperation smacks of trolls who are heavily invested in the swamp. Almost as if Schumer or one of the Clinton cabal are paying for their comments.
The Q comments/questions have certainly caused many of us to be aware of and research much more than if Q had not presented the thoughts. So I am grateful for that. These discussions have gotten a lot of information spread far and wide. That scares these trolls and their masters, but then that is the purpose.
I never thought Q was psychic just sharing information so who cares if Q comments about something before or after it happens. Quibbling that is a red herring.
I question everything but there is an element that seems quite frantic about it. They must be having nightmares about rope burn on the neck...
He obliquely mentioned the Pope in a way that caused folks to be certain he had anticipated the Lord’s Prayer change. I don’t recall the specifics. It was a day or 3 before it happened.
Is Q supposed to predict in every single post?
If something is posted, maybe it is to be tied to, or it emphasizes something, or is just a reminder of a fact.
Great points. Thanks.
He quoted the Lord’s Prayer. A couple of days later the Pope suggested changing the wording of the Lord’s Prayer.
I will note that you seem to have no respect for the unnamed intelligence military folks many Q-anon interpreters have access to.
IIRC, the military tribunals thing was in the discussion before Mattis went to Gitmo. Given the givens in the Executive Order, Gitmo was and is the most logical source from the EO forward.
Mattis visit was after that fact.
The Q deniers know their other bosses, soros and the ratchildren, will be next to fall. The Q deniers fear the loss of their multiple streams of income.
Desperados don't come to their senses, no matter how badly The Eagles beg them to do so.
Not a tweet. IIRC, it was in an email from Chelsea to Hillary in the Wikileaks documents.
Jaw on floor................ Where is it from? I am wondering if I should post and ping or someone else has one posted I should ping. But I don’t know if it’s Q?
Very well said, MAGA!!!
CGato
Well thank you for your honesty. I hope this means you are respectfully accepting of my debunking of that particular point, and we can work together to actually analyze the rest of those claims, to prevent them from being spread if they are indeed inaccurate?
Fox is running a series, “Scandalous”, abouy the Clintons. On now, but I had to turn it off or I’d be too upset to sleep.
Thank you, cat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.