The problem for large national chains, in particular, is that an increase in minimum wage (mandatory expense) in some states may force "voluntary" increase in other states, to keep workers from resenting the disparity and joining the
"fight for $15".
Meanwhile, companies like GrubHub (GRUB) are capitalizing on the situation and the technology to provide the consumers the experience of restaurant meal without visiting the physical place where the meal was made. Couple it with comfortable home setting and a glass / bottle of wine bought at significantly lower prices than at restaurant, no hassle of driving, finding parking or paying for valet and/or dressing up... and you have a better, cheaper experience. There are now restaurant/gourmet "kitchens" that have no tables or servers, just doing catering orders by delivery.
1 posted on
01/15/2018 11:31:47 PM PST by
CutePuppy
To: CutePuppy
Simple, cut back on the tip.
2 posted on
01/15/2018 11:41:31 PM PST by
glorgau
To: CutePuppy
Good insights, CP. I hadn’t thought of tech and the delivery model overhauling food service the way it did retail, taxi, and video delivery. Why go to a movie theater when you can have your own private home big screen with content streamed to it? Same for food as you say.
To: CutePuppy
The California answer, which has already made it to Austin, is food vans where there are few tables, no servers. People wait in line cafeteria style to get their food and take it someplace else to be eaten. It all may be an illusion but I’m generally turned off by such places. My image is seedy greasy food from fly-by-night businesses but there’s no arguing that the low overhead allows for cheaper prices than in a brick-and-mortar restaurant.
4 posted on
01/15/2018 11:58:30 PM PST by
OrangeHoof
(Donald Trump: Doing the work American politicians just won't do.)
To: CutePuppy
Minimum-wage increase proposals are NOT about minimum wages.
It's about UNION wages (read government employees mostly) and UNION DUES.
Like
"Artie" on another thread wrote.
"but my theory is thatthis is one of the foundations of single payer.
Down the road, as single payer replaces ObamaCare,all healthcare workers will become in essence government employees.Think about how many thousands of new, dues paying union members will magically become part of the SEIU.
Barry had sealed this deal with Andy Stern years ago.
Barry promised Andy and the SEIU thousands of new members,Andy saysgreat,
this is the wage structure we needso we can pay the slush fund.
Gotta pay a living wage to all of the new union membersso dues can be extracted
and kickbacks to the dems can be made.
Its convolutedbut what dem scheme isnt,especially when large sums of cash are involved?"
So read the following:
Union Support Of Minimum Wage Hike Is Self-Interested by RICHARD BERMAN on Aug 26, 2013
Mary Kay Henry, president of the Service Employees International Union, ... was quick to emphasize that her organization's support of a more-than-twofold increase in the minimum wage was "not about growing unions."
This may be true but it's also undeniable that such a move would have a profound impact on growing union paychecks, even if those unions don't count a single minimum-wage employee in their ranks.
The fine print can be found in union contracts. Each year, the Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) releases a number of union collective bargaining agreements (CBAs).
Unsurprisingly, many CBAs available in the OLMS database LINK union salaries and wage rates to the federal minimum wage. There are a number of methods that unions use to accomplish this end. The two most popular appear to be setting baseline union wages as a percentage above the minimum wage, and mandating a flat wage at a set level above the minimum wage.
One example is a series of CBAs signed with the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE). Their contracts mandated that"(w)henever the federal legal minimum wage is increased, minimum wage (in the agreement) shall be increased so that each will be at least fifteen (15%) percent higher than such legal minimum wage."
There's also an SEIU local's contract, which ordered that"(t)he minimum hourly wage rates shall exceed any statutory applicable minimum wage rate by 50 cents."
Some unions have also arranged contracts where the employer MUST renegotiate their contracts in case of a minimum-wage hike, NO MATTER HOW LONG is left on the pact's life span.
The possibility for abuse here is staggering:Unions with average wages WELL ABOVE the minimum wage CAN INSERT such clauses into their contracts, FORCING negotiations in industries not otherwise affected by a wage hike.
Given the limited number of CBAs available in the OLMS database, it's impossible to determine just how widespread this practice is.
But at least one union has trumpeted this arrangement as "one of the many advantages of being a union member."
Earlier this year on its blog, the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union proudly boasted that "oftentimes, union contracts ARE TRIGGERED TO IMPLEMENT WAGE HIKES IN CASE OF MINIMUM WAGE INCREASES."
This is a stunning admission of SELF-INTERESTt for an organization that's actively PUSHING minimum-wage hikes at both the state and federal levels of government.
It also raises questions about unions' growing use of nonunion "worker centers" like the Restaurant Opportunities Center, OUR Walmart, Fast Food Forward and other organizations that have made headlines in recent months.
These groups advocate many policies that would affect those businesses that pay a minimum wage restaurants, retailers, etc. and a minimum-wage hike is often the FIRST demand that these union front groups make. This only casts further suspicion on the motives of the labor unions funding these groups.
No matter how you look at it, the benefits that these unions stand to reap from a minimum-wage hike should raise questions about their real motives and whether they're only manipulating the debate over fast-food wages for their own benefit.
Berman is the executive director at the Center for Union Facts.
![](https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/650-083117-Limb-Inst.jpg)
Young Student Gets Limbaugh Lesson on the Minimum Wage
Oct 27, 2017
RUSH: This is Caden in Reno.
Great to have you.
CALLER: Hi, Mr. Limbaugh. RUSH: Hi.
CALLER: This is just an honor.
I just want to say how much of an honor this is to be speaking with you on your show.
I am just
Im doing a speech on Monday in my speech and debate class on why the minimum wage should NOT be increased.
RUSH: Mmm-hmm.
CALLER: And I would like to
I was wondering if you could give me a couple of talking points on whyraising the minimum wage to $15 an hour would affect the economy
or just business in general.
RUSH: Okay.
Caden, but first, before I answer this,do you have a computer ?
Are you able Google things and search them ?
CALLER: Yeah.
RUSH: Okay.
Because youre gonna need to do this because youre gonna find the evidence Im gonna give you.
CALLER: Okay. RUSH: Seattle.
You need to search Seattle and restaurants and find out what happened to them after the minimum wage was raised to $15 an hour.
A bunch of restaurants closed, Caden.
Raising the minimum wage choosing an arbitrary number that has nothing to do with the market and demanding that the least qualified earn that money
means that people get fired.
Businesses do not have a pile of money theyre not usingthat they can go raise wages from.
They have to earn it via sales or whatever.
So what happens when the minimum wage is raised arbitrarily on the command of governmentis that people lose their jobs.
More people end up out of work,
and the resulting increase in the minimum wage is not enough to counterbalance that at all.
But you Google Seattle and restaurants, and youll find outthe number of restaurants that have had to close since they raised the minimum wage to $15.
It will be your argument right there.
You can do your entire report on that story.
Related Links
6 posted on
01/16/2018 12:03:14 AM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: CutePuppy
Robots. Restaurants might stay, but restaurant jobs are going. Busboys are already nearly gone in CA.
7 posted on
01/16/2018 12:08:33 AM PST by
Yaelle
To: CutePuppy
Provide good food, good service and do so in an efficient manner and your restaurant will succeed.
To: CutePuppy
I won’t eat where an illegal with hep C handles my food.
11 posted on
01/16/2018 1:48:20 AM PST by
867V309
(Lock Her Up)
To: CutePuppy
Government is simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together. — Barney Fwank
12 posted on
01/16/2018 1:59:07 AM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: CutePuppy
Maybe restaurants should follow the Australian model ( or McDonalds). When you arrive at a restaurant you go to the counter and place your order, pay for it,then go find a table. Waiters will bring your food but you bus your own table. There are also no refills on beverages.
I do find that the younger generation absolutely loves to eat out. Spent 2 months with my daughter and her family and she only cooked about 4 or 5 times. Lunch was always leftovers from previous nights dining out.
13 posted on
01/16/2018 2:13:10 AM PST by
heylady
To: CutePuppy
Who charges less for takeout than for eat-in?
The only way that’s been true for me is to not leave a tip for takeout, whereas I leave a tip for eat-in.
To: CutePuppy
Many chains were on last legs before this. The increase may help their demise, but the food industry has been in decline for quite some time.
To: CutePuppy
Large chains may be better able to weather this, economy of scale thing, than the mom-and-pops. Around here the latter’s margins run around 5%. These hikes are a killer. And NYS plans more.
17 posted on
01/16/2018 3:42:53 AM PST by
mewzilla
To: CutePuppy
I’m miles out in the country. No Grubhub here.
Not many restaurants, either. Those that are here have staff that are often friends and family, and grateful for any wage and love their work and customers.
20 posted on
01/16/2018 4:14:44 AM PST by
Alas Babylon!
(Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
To: CutePuppy
Fine dining will not go away. The great mom and pop diner will, but they were already in trouble.
To: CutePuppy
"Fine dining is going to go by the wayside."True but not primarily because of wages. Fine dinning is diminishing in direct proportion to how many consumers are getting used to finger foods wrapped in deli paper with side dishes of potatoes in cardboard pouches. More and more consumers don't know how to 'set a table' nor how to properly use the 'silverware'.
There is a diminishing need for white tablecloth fine dining restaurants as the 'coat & tie' customers are replaced by the 'hoodie & T-shirt' crowd. What once was referred to "After Six" elegant attire for an evening out , now refers to changing to fresh/clean underwear etc "After Six" days of wear.............
25 posted on
01/16/2018 4:19:04 AM PST by
varon
(Let the hanging games begin)
To: CutePuppy
Induced inflation to cause general inflation that will solve many democrat problems.
Also, the general inflation will reduce the national debt.
26 posted on
01/16/2018 4:20:09 AM PST by
Thibodeaux
(2018 is looking good)
To: CutePuppy
This works great for the chain restaurants and poorly for the mom and pop businesses. The large chains flush with cash then lobby Congress for more of this kind of legislation, and back candidates that give them even more legislation conducive to their businesses, and there you have it — crony capitalism aka progressive fascism.
27 posted on
01/16/2018 4:35:07 AM PST by
Ge0ffrey
To: CutePuppy
I remember that years ago in Phoenix, somebody actually did the math and found out that within six months after opening, half (50%) of all new restaurants failed. Within a year, half the the remainder failed as well.
When there is such a brutal market, it is very sensitive to any changes that make their business harder.
32 posted on
01/16/2018 5:14:38 AM PST by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
To: CutePuppy
People keep giving me gift cards to a family restaurant that has chains all over town. This is all well and good but I don’t eat out that much anymore and have to wait for friends getting together and choosing this particular restaurant, because I don’t like to dine alone. Recently the chain instituted a drive-through window and that solved my problem. I love the drive-through service.
40 posted on
01/16/2018 6:09:10 AM PST by
Ciexyz
(I'm conservative & traditionalist, a nationalist and patriot.)
To: CutePuppy
As costs rise, only so much of the burden can be passed along to consumers in the form of price hikes before they decide they cannot afford the expense. I'm trying to figure out why this simple fact can be accepted as the truth when it comes to restaurant jobs, but is not accepted by so many folks even here on FreeRepublic when it comes to manufacturing jobs?
"If a manufacturing company can't find good workers, they should just pay more!" -- common refrain here on FR.
What the statement from the article illustrates is that it's not the employer who really determines the wage scale for his employees ... it's the customer.
43 posted on
01/16/2018 8:22:02 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson