Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Two Clinton Issues That Could Shake America in 2018
lifezette ^ | 01/01/2018 | Mark Tapscott

Posted on 01/01/2018 9:26:42 AM PST by bitt

American courts promise 'equal justice under the law,' but will that maxim be applied to the tarnished couple? by Mark Tapscott | Updated 01 Jan 2018 at 10:04 AM When former congresswoman Corrine Brown reports to a federal prison this month to begin serving a five-year sentence for her role in an $800,000 charity fraud, the question will be raised about why she is in jail — but Hillary Clinton remains free.

That question and the fact Clinton has never been charged with mishandling classified national security documents during her four years as secretary of State raise serious doubts about whether justice is applied equally to powerful and influential citizens, as well as everyday Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifezette.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2018issues; charlesortel; clinton; clintoncrimefamily; crookedhillary; hillarycrimes; justice; lockherup; trumpdoj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: bitt

simple answer to why nothing on Clintons / Obama

They have all the NSA illegal recordings and can blackmail anyone at any time even relatives if they want to...

Late in watching the film Snowden, but it turned out to be very revealing if in fact the program depicted existed and was used in the ways portrayed...


21 posted on 01/01/2018 10:14:39 AM PST by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; GOPJ; RitaOK; DollyCali; Tennessee Nana; sickoflibs; TADSLOS; AuntB; SgtBob; ...
.....the question will be raised....why Corinne Brown is in jail — but Hillary Clinton remains free.......

<><> the Clintons shamelessly exploited the presidency, and her position at State, doling out US govt favors to foundation donors,

<><>they had the "do-good" game down pat....Chelsea furrowd her little brow and worried about endangered elephants and BOOM no. 278 Clinton fund-raiser was born,

<><> they are very adept at dancing around the law to get rich quick.

=====================================

REFERENCE---The Australian newspaper the "Herald Sun" ran an October article entitled, “Why have we donated to Clinton’s foundation?” The paper noted "Former Prime Minister Gillard donated $300 million of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education.”

That's one humongous amt of Australian govt money that fell into the hands of the conniving Clintons. The Herald Sun needs to dig deeper---to determine if any of that money took a circuitous route then landed back into the personal coffers of the donors. Could have happened like this:

BACKSTORY When he went to jail, investigators found Ponzi King Bernie Madoff had stashed billions offshore-----into a labyrinth of financial entities.

COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACIES GALORE Some $8.9 billion was funneled to Madoff through a dozen so-called feeder funds based in Europe, the Caribbean and Central America......a labyrinth of hedge funds, management companies and service providers that, to unsuspecting outsiders, seemed to compose a formidable system of checks and balances.

But the purpose of this complex architecture was just the opposite: the feeder funds provided different modes for directing money to Madoff in order to avoid scrutiny.

=========================================

Some observers inside Germany believe the German government has some explaining to do for the donation that appears under the Clinton Foundation heading “Donors and Grantors”.“Why does a Ministry supports the election campaign of a U.S. presidential candidate?” blogged Vera Lengsfeld — former civil rights activist and German parliamentarian. “It seems German taxpayers unwittingly financed Hillary Clinton’s election campaign.” There is also the question pending: how many German govt ministries gave money to the Clintons.

==========================================

The most incriminating thing---so far--- is Billy's infamous "pass-through account." ==============================================

STROLL DOWN MEMORY LANE--- Billybooboo's infamous "WJC LLC" pass-through account....funds deposited then emptied the same day. Funds just disappear, and no scrutiny involved.

Funds passing through Billybooboo's WJC LLC could end up in: (a) offshore accounts, (b) money market accounts, (c) hedge funds, (d) another foundation account, (e) assorted investment accounts....without garnering public scrutiny.

22 posted on 01/01/2018 10:15:05 AM PST by Liz (One side in this conflict has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesnt know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt

bookmark


23 posted on 01/01/2018 10:19:12 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The Clintons would not have committed these crimes if it weren’t for global warming.


24 posted on 01/01/2018 10:20:30 AM PST by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
To be fair, there are reasons why Brown is going to jail and Hillary isn't. Mostly experience, power and influence.

Hillary's been scamming for decades, with the help of some of the shrewdest con artists in the business.

She may not practice law, but she knows how to exploit its loopholes and avoid liabilities. She knows people who know shell corporations and offshore accounts, how to hide transactions and make documents disappear.

And if problems arise, she knows people who make problems go away.

In short, Hillary's corrupt but she's not stupid.

Brown's just a local small-timer, she probably was dumb enough to sign incriminating documents and involve herself directly in corruption.

25 posted on 01/01/2018 10:22:50 AM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

It’s been clear since Bill Clinton was poking interns in the WH


26 posted on 01/01/2018 10:24:54 AM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smileyface
...won’t there be some Arkancide???

Highly interesting topic, and I am not at all an expert. One suspects that the current political environment might provide the best timing for such a flip-storm on the Clintons.

I have no knowledge of anything, of course, but I'm free to offer conjecture and hypotheses.

One one hand, folks who found themselves caught up in any Clintonian crimes no longer have a cushion of corruption to shield or divert any prying investigations. Thus, flipping could indemnify them from being caught, charged, and tried. And, if someone else flips first, then they might lose out on plea deals offered to the first flipper.

On the other hand, Arkancide (assuming for the sake of argument that it exists) might be more difficult to arrange, and might be more thoroughly investigated, added to which, we would be watching for it. Thus, a Clintonian criminal conspirator might feel less threatened, and more inclined to take advantage of a GOP-led Justice Dept.

Again, all of the above are guesses, not accusations and not based on any knowledge. Other FReepers who are knowledgeable on the topic are welcome to chime in.

.

27 posted on 01/01/2018 10:34:03 AM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bitt
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9u01MJVuBk
 
Wall Street financial expert Charles Ortel claims the Clinton Foundation is the “largest unprosecuted charity fraud in world history.” He also says this global fraud could not be pulled off without a lot of help. Ortel explains, “I think this is an example of a vast left-wing conspiracy. If you go back into the history, the Clintons always like to expose the things that go down for their credit, and they always try to hide the stuff that doesn’t make them look so good. When you go back into the history of the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, and now Chelsea, have been monetizing government service. They have been operating as Robin Hood in reverse. Stealing from the poor to reward their rich cronies. . . . I think what you have here is a case study on the proponents of the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party, and they tend to be left-leaning, how these people got together and figured out a charity where foreigners can give unlimited amounts of money, and U.S. players can give unlimited amounts of tax deductible money to an entity. This could be a preferred vehicle for strengthening the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party and Clinton interests around the world.”
 
Even though the Clinton Foundation is an official charity with a so-called “501(c) 3” designation from the IRS, Ortel says it’s not functioning as a legitimate charity. Ortel charges on his website that “Clinton Foundation documents omit crucial facts, include false and materially misleading statements, and exclude legally required audits of financial statements for each year of operation, that must be prepared on a consistent basis.”
 
Ortel also explains, “There are two sides to the coin. I think Peter Schweizer (Clinton Cash author) and his team have done a very good job of exposing this very difficult to expose pay-to-play stuff. I doubt there are criminals dumb enough who sit down and write memoranda in great detail and say ‘alright, you give me $1 million and I’ll give your this ambassadorship. Let’s sign on the dotted line here. Please wire the money to this account.’ I don’t think you are going to find those types of records. At the end of the day, even if you write a great book, and the book is good, and even if you do a movie and the movie is good, at the end of the day, the skeptical press is going to say there is no evidence.”
 
Ortel goes on to say, “On the other hand, on charity fraud, it’s a very different thing. In charity fraud, unlike pay-to-play, you don’t have to prove intent. Under New York State law, in particular, the requirement is merely that you prove the public filings in the Clinton Foundation are false and materially misleading, and they certainly are. This is why you are starting to see these editorial boards around the world say wait a minute. You also have to prove that they solicited, not that they raised money, that they solicited. That, the Clintons have admitted. . . . On the charity fraud side of life, that is the mine field for the Clintons. The second the IRS, or any attorney general or a state taxing authority, decides to make an issue of this, the burden of proof shifts . . . the charity has to come forward and prove the affirmative case. The Clinton Foundation has to prove, since October 23, 1997, that all you have been doing exclusively is furthering the authorized tax exempted purposes, which as far as I know is, to be merely a research facility and archive based in Little Rock. Prove that’s all you have done. Show us the legally audited financial statements. Show us those audits.”
 
In closing, Ortel contends, “This is a tale that needs to be told, but it’s not going to be a tale that people swallow at first blush given the fact how powerful the Clintons are or how vengeful the Clintons are when they are in power. . . . Another way to talk about the Clintons is the Bonnie and Clyde of charity or the Al Capone of charity.”
 
 
Keep in mind there isn’t just a “Clinton Foundation” - there is actually a global network of them:
 
*The Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI)
*The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation
*The Clinton Foundation Hong Kong
*William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya)
*William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK)
*The Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden)
*The Clinton/Guistra Partnership, Canada
 
 

28 posted on 01/01/2018 10:39:11 AM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
"If you Brown you go down, while the White B***h get Rich!"

Get this on a bumper sticker and have some groups do a FREE mass distribution, then stand back and watch.............

29 posted on 01/01/2018 10:39:52 AM PST by varon (Let the hanging games begin.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
Hopefully, this is one New Year's predictions that will come true in 2018!

That expert is Charles Ortel, who told LifeZette Sunday he expects former FBI Director James “Comey will rat out Hillary and the Clintons faster than [Olympic sprinter] Usain Bolt runs the 100-meter dash. Both Clintons will be convicted, bigly” in 2018.

30 posted on 01/01/2018 10:43:09 AM PST by Grampa Dave (America had regime change 20 Jan 2017! ISIS collapsed! Are Iran/Our media, the DNC/FBI/DOJ/CIA next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: immadashell

Agreed, even if they were indicted, the trials would likely last 5-10 years, and end in a pre-planned mistrial. The slime is thick in Clinton world.


31 posted on 01/01/2018 10:47:50 AM PST by Fireone (Lock Her Up! (and 100 of her accomplices))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt
... most significantly operating international medical and disaster relief programs in violation of the nonprofit’s tax-exempt charter granted by the IRS.

This is the crime that's going to shake America?

If this is the most significant violation that Ortel's got we're wasting our time.

32 posted on 01/01/2018 10:49:30 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

33 posted on 01/01/2018 10:50:14 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (The remoulade was a trifle tart, but the souflee for dessert more than made up for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Perhaps not charging the Clinton’s, Hitlary in particular, with the numerous federal crimes they have no doubt committed, AG Sessions feels due to their ages and health will not live long enough to go through the numerous trials needed. Why waste the money prosecuting either of them? Then, once convicted, there would be the numerous appeals, etc. again causing major expense to go through it over and over again. Let them live out their miserable lives in shame instead of prison where they definitely belong.


34 posted on 01/01/2018 10:52:36 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

May the Clintoons behind closed doors without admitting guilt will surrender all of their millions/billions they have looted from us.

Then, go to Haiti to live out the rest of their miserable life helping the poor there.

They will live in a single room mud hut with palm leaves and have to forage for their food and clothing.


35 posted on 01/01/2018 10:57:30 AM PST by Grampa Dave (America had regime change 20 Jan 2017! ISIS collapsed! Are Iran/Our media, the DNC/FBI/DOJ/CIA next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

The Trump administration has a golden opportunity to establish america as a country under the rule of law and not under the powerful. Putting Hillary and Bill in prison would be a first great step in doing that; just as when the DOJ finally got John Gotti.


36 posted on 01/01/2018 11:00:36 AM PST by morphing libertarian (Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bitt

No matter. Some underlings may be prosecuted. But the Clintons will say they didn’t actually run things and, besides, they’re politicians. They don’t knows nuthin’ ‘bout runnin’ no bidenesses.”


37 posted on 01/01/2018 11:03:30 AM PST by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; LucyT

Let’s look at the pool of peers for the jury?

If the prosecutors cannot get convictions on the rioters on inauguration day or put Senator Menendez in the hoosegow, nothing is going to happen.

It is a national disgrace that a large number, an overwhelming majority in some communities, want and tolerate the criminality associated with the Clintons and the Donkeycrats (Uniparty).

There is no moral compass, IMHO.


38 posted on 01/01/2018 11:05:18 AM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Five years in prison is preferable to Arkancide.


39 posted on 01/01/2018 11:05:29 AM PST by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt

SPY vs SPY: Mueller Yanks Comey’s Immunity Deal; Falling Out Between Former FBI Bosses Puts Comey in Danger!

There has been a reported falling out between U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller and ex-FBI Chief James Comey in recent weeks which leaves Comey potentially vulnerable to possible criminal charges, according to Justice Department and FBI sources.

The stakes have changed in the sweeping Russia collusion investigation that has spread far beyond the 2016 presidential election timeline.

Any immunity agreement that was previously on the table protecting Comey is now off the table, according to multiple DOJ sources. For months since he was fired by President Donald Trump in June, Comey has been testifying and acting like a major D.C. player with little to worry about.

But at some point in recent weeks, that has changed based on new information about Comey’s tenure at FBI which has been uncovered during Mueller’s probe, sources said.

Perhaps this is one reason why Comey has taken to social media to quote scripture and post nature pictures, including one photo of him standing alone amid corn stalks in a field during a sunset in Iowa.

Excerpted! For full oped go to the link below.

https://truepundit.com/spy-vs-spy-mueller-yanks-comeys-immunity-deal-falling-out-between-former-fbi-bosses-puts-comey-in-danger/


40 posted on 01/01/2018 11:06:18 AM PST by Grampa Dave (America had regime change 20 Jan 2017! ISIS collapsed! Are Iran/Our media, the DNC/FBI/DOJ/CIA next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson