Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
The White House ^ | 12/21/17 | President Donald Trump

Posted on 12/21/2017 4:27:16 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dsj02; humanrights; humantrafficking; property; qanon; repositorystorm; stormsblowingin; trump; trumpeo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-449 next last
It's long, read the rest here. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

Trump broadside against the various "Foundations" that fund anti-american activities?

The Clinton Foundation?

George Soro's various foundations?

1 posted on 12/21/2017 4:27:16 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Due process? What’s that?


2 posted on 12/21/2017 4:31:01 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Bookmark Soros


3 posted on 12/21/2017 4:33:21 PM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Do they get due process if they are not a citizen?


4 posted on 12/21/2017 4:35:33 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Yes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/


5 posted on 12/21/2017 4:36:07 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Yes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Already posted:


EO Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

6 posted on 12/21/2017 4:36:20 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Is there an anecdote to help explain this laymen like?

My head spins when I try to translate legalese.


7 posted on 12/21/2017 4:36:29 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (Hurtling deplorable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.


8 posted on 12/21/2017 4:37:22 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Yes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Doesn’t look to be limited to non-citizens.


9 posted on 12/21/2017 4:37:46 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

This needs the readers digest edition. Non-Lawyer friendly description of who what where and when.

At first glance though. This sounds YOUGE!!


10 posted on 12/21/2017 4:38:24 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Now I’m torn.

Take down the Clinton Foundation or give them due process?


11 posted on 12/21/2017 4:38:59 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Yes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

DWS and her Pakistan crew? (DNC and the congress critters that they worked for)


12 posted on 12/21/2017 4:39:34 PM PST by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

DWS and her Pakistan crew? (DNC and the congress critters that they worked for)


13 posted on 12/21/2017 4:39:35 PM PST by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

My apologies. I searched for Executive Order in the title and nothing came up.


14 posted on 12/21/2017 4:39:46 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Yes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Basically the same poisonous “logic” behind civil forfeiture laws.


15 posted on 12/21/2017 4:39:47 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Due process? What’s that?

These powers existed under Obama. If you want to get rid of them, then just have Trump exercise them vigorously.

16 posted on 12/21/2017 4:40:01 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Already Posted
17 posted on 12/21/2017 4:40:05 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media and Shariah Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Agreed, I can’t make any sense of it.


18 posted on 12/21/2017 4:40:30 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Wow - this could really suck for people who faithfully rape children and mutilate who men.........


19 posted on 12/21/2017 4:41:00 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Watch out. The powers granted in these statutes could easily be politicized. Our concept of human rights is not the same as Obama’s. The next President could do a 180, labeling Republicans as human rights abusers if they criticize Islam or LGBT.


20 posted on 12/21/2017 4:41:15 PM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson