Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban 3.0 And The Left Loses It’s Mind, Again
Victory Girls Blog ^ | 12/4/17 | Nina Bookout

Posted on 12/05/2017 2:15:29 AM PST by x1stcav

Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the law. Specifically they decided that the travel ban, which we’ve written about often, instituted by President Trump can move forward. Via Legal Insurrection:

The Supreme Court will allow President Trump’s Third Travel Ord to take full effect, the Justices ruled in two Orders Monday afternoon staying lower court rulings enjoining the Travel Order

President Trump’s Third Travel Order restricted entry of nationals from Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Chad, Somalia, North Korea and Venezuela.

Lower court rulings, specifically those from radical judges from Maryland and Hawaii, were stayed. You can read them here and here.

Interestingly, although Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor ruled against; Justices Breyer and Kagan (an Obama appointee!) joined the other five in ruling in favor of the Trump Administration.

(Excerpt) Read more at victorygirlsblog.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ban; blog; blogcrap; blogpimp; clickbait; notnews; supreme; travel; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: x1stcav

correct me if I’m wrong, but SCOTUS said the injunction was disallowed.

The case along with several other cases are yet to be decided


21 posted on 12/05/2017 5:37:56 AM PST by Thibodeaux (2018 is looking good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The standard seems to be that whatever is bad for the shameful and corrupt left is good for America.


22 posted on 12/05/2017 5:40:07 AM PST by AmericanMermaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMermaid

WINNING! Hahaha.


23 posted on 12/05/2017 5:45:52 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav

Sorry, no victory yet. Just progress. The first big clue is this:

“Lower court rulings, specifically those from radical judges from Maryland and Hawaii, were stayed.”

If Trump had gotten final victory, the orders would be OVERRULED, or DISSOLVED, not “stayed.”

On first glance it seems to me that the Supreme’s ruling is this: If Trump pushes to overturn the anti-Trump orders, and the Supremes decide to hear the case, and Trump wins, the orders will be overruled/dissolved. If Trump does not push the case with the Supremes, or the Supremes refuse to take it, or they take it and Trump loses, the anti-Trump orders will come back in force.


24 posted on 12/05/2017 5:51:31 AM PST by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
Got ya.

Its the only “news” I get on my truck radio. Is kind of good to listen to the enemy once and awhile.

25 posted on 12/05/2017 5:58:29 AM PST by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the 0zarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj

Breyer and Kagan voted the right way? Say what?


26 posted on 12/05/2017 6:46:01 AM PST by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Yes! Gotta love it!


27 posted on 12/05/2017 7:15:36 AM PST by AmericanMermaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fungoking

Not surprising coming from National People’s Radio.

“Shoes for industry!”


28 posted on 12/05/2017 7:29:53 AM PST by Noumenon ("progressive” describes the progression of a terminal disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Heh. Weird. If any RAT appointed SCOTUS judge defected, I would have guessed Sotomayor.

Speaking of which, we're long overdue for a RAT appointed SCOTUS judge going maverick and regularly voting right-of-center on the bench. I can't see any of the awful decisions in recent decades being overturned unless one of the RAT judges becomes another James Clark McReynolds or Byron White.

29 posted on 12/05/2017 10:46:25 AM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj

When that happens, one knows that Ginsburg and Sotomayor really went on a trip.


30 posted on 12/05/2017 10:54:20 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

Breyer has occasionally voted the right way, yes? A guy named after ice cream can’t be all bad.

Kagan surprised me.

Wise Latina voting with us on this would have shocked me. To think rats touted her as a moderate, Senate rats suggested her to GW Bush.

I’d wager there will never be a rat Justice (or Federal Judge, period) to the right of Breyer ever again.


31 posted on 12/05/2017 5:17:20 PM PST by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj

“I’d wager there will never be a rat Justice (or Federal Judge, period) to the right of Breyer ever again.”


I would take that bet. Breyer is quite liberal (even if he’s clearly not as left-wing as Ginsburg and Sotomayor), and even Democrat presidents sometimes nominate moderates (either because they were recommended by local Democrats or because they don’t pay much attention and one slips by them) to district courts in Utah and such. Heck, Bill Clinton nominated a member of Opus Dei to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.


32 posted on 12/05/2017 6:07:52 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

Good point on the lower courts, which Clinton PR Judge was in Opus Dei?

For Supreme Court though (and appeals courts) I’m sticking with the prediction that Breyer is as far right as a rat will go. One wonders how “moderate” Merrick Garland actually was, as moderate as Wise Latina?

Speaking of Puerto Rico, my mom would appreciate it if you could keep Blaise Cupich down there somehow. ;-)


33 posted on 12/05/2017 10:19:47 PM PST by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy

Judge Jay García is Opus Dei. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_A._Garcia-Gregory

Is Archbishop Cupich visiting Puerto Rico? Maybe he can take Archbishop Roberto González with him back to Chicago. : )


34 posted on 12/06/2017 5:21:18 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

Good judge?

“Soupy” as he’s called is indeed visiting the island. The Pope dispatched him there, hell if I know why. I doubt he’s helping to restore the power grid.

Your Archbishop sucks too, eh?


35 posted on 12/06/2017 7:23:06 AM PST by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Judge García is OK. Archbishop González sucks. He calls for rallies to combat any move to reduce the size of government, but says nary a word about abortion, marriage or other things that actually fall under his purview.


36 posted on 12/06/2017 1:05:42 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pax_et_bonum

37 posted on 12/06/2017 1:12:59 PM PST by bar sin·is·ter (Climate Scientology - another example of science fiction morphing into a religious cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bar sin·is·ter

Lol!

Perfect!!!


38 posted on 12/06/2017 6:12:14 PM PST by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the SEALs of Extortion 17 - and God Bless The United States of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson